SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would you accept

Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 21, 2019
Published: Jun. 21, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Fair trade or nah?
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
15$82,000,000$65,602,417$660,750$0$16,397,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$735,000$735,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 21, 2019 at 6:41 p.m.
#1
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,155
Likes: 1,644
lol no
Jun. 21, 2019 at 6:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,279
Likes: 7,138
I would hope Minnesota would say yes to that - I am a bigger fan of Labanc than Zucker. And it makes sense since they want to go younger. But I don't think SJS can take on the Zucker contract.
Jun. 21, 2019 at 7:04 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
Quoting: VGKNation702
lol no


why? who loses in this trade?
Jun. 21, 2019 at 7:27 p.m.
#4
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Quoting: tylerberg97
why? who loses in this trade?


sharks, big time
Jun. 21, 2019 at 7:49 p.m.
#5
Vorg1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 244
Likes: 52
Doug Wilson does not get fleeced like this. Labanc will arguably net more points than Zucker and Radil is a great defensive forward at only 700k..no way.
Jun. 21, 2019 at 10:26 p.m.
#6
TheEmphatic1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 375
Likes: 39
Is this because of the Danny Heatley for Martn Havlat trade? Is this because we took Brett Burns and basically left you with Devin Setoguchi and Charlie Coyle? You're pulling my leg here. Kevin Labanc is of high value especially after the season he just had.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll