SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trade with Calgary

Created by: budsallday
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 20, 2019
Published: Nov. 20, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I am not a "Trade Nylander for anything" guy but hear me out.

CGY sounds like they are ready to make a move to create a spark, and Tkachuck is the type of player leafs lack. He is also awesome.

Add in Barrie so he can find his confidence in a new team, where they will have a different usage for him that gets the best out of him.

Add Jeremy Bracco and a conditional draft 1st round pick if Barrie gets 50 pts with CGY or he re-signs.
In return Leafs also get back a right-handed defencemen
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,840,610$0$127,500$659,390
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$694,444$694,444 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:15 a.m.
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Wow this trade is bad for Calgary!!!!
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:15 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
If Tkachuk is the target, Marner is the piece going back and likely in a 1 for one. Why? Because of the contracts. Now I know Calgary fans are going to say, Tkachuck's contract is better but it really isn't. Why? I am glad you asked. Its because these 3 year bridge deals with huge final years are extremely risky. What if the player doesn't do well? The team is on the hook for a massive QO. If he plays well, how big is Tkachuk's next contract going to be? He's already looking like he's the best player on the Flames so his next deal could be massive! So if TO is moving something for Tkachuk, it needs to balance in the future which is why Marner would have to go the other way. I think Tkachuck in 3 years is going to get an 8 year deal in the 11 million range, so its kind of a wash money wise long term. Moving Nylander for Tkachuk doesn't make sense for the Leafs because they won't be able to afford the next deal in 3 years.
GenXHockey and budsallday liked this.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:17 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Jamiepo
Wow this trade is bad for Calgary!!!!


It doesn't really make sense for either team if you look longer term. In my opinion if there was a trade to make here, it would be Marner for Tkachuk straight up. Its the only way to balance the future cap hits. Tkachuk may make less now but in 3 years, his contract is going to be nuts. Possibly higher than Marner's so the only way to make a deal like this work would be Marner for Tkachuk.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:22 a.m.
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: LoganOllivier
It doesn't really make sense for either team if you look longer term. In my opinion if there was a trade to make here, it would be Marner for Tkachuk straight up. Its the only way to balance the future cap hits. Tkachuk may make less now but in 3 years, his contract is going to be nuts. Possibly higher than Marner's so the only way to make a deal like this work would be Marner for Tkachuk.


I agree with that. I love nylander but he won’t be the main piece to get you andersson and Chuky. Any trade with marner and Chuky would require leafs to take on additional cap.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:29 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Jamiepo
I agree with that. I love nylander but he won’t be the main piece to get you andersson and Chuky. Any trade with marner and Chuky would require leafs to take on additional cap.


Only temporary cap though.

They could do something like Marner for Tkachuk and Frolik or probably Derek Ryan. I'd prefer it be Frolik because he's FA after this season and can be let go. This balances the deal for both sides capwise in both the short term and long term. TO likely has more cap problems due to this trade since Tkachuk is going to be a huge deal in 3 years.
GenXHockey liked this.
Nov. 20, 2019 at 10:56 a.m.
#6
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Only temporary cap though.

They could do something like Marner for Tkachuk and Frolik or probably Derek Ryan. I'd prefer it be Frolik because he's FA after this season and can be let go. This balances the deal for both sides capwise in both the short term and long term. TO likely has more cap problems due to this trade since Tkachuk is going to be a huge deal in 3 years.


Oh for sure temporary, otherwise I would have suggested retaining on marner. Think an upcoming ufa like Frolik could work but I think Ryan would be the one to move to fit marner next season.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll