SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Krug stays

Created by: Erikkef
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2020
Published: Apr. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,500,000
2$2,200,000
2$1,850,000
2$925,000
2$900,000
1$700,000
1$725,000
1$950,000
1$767,500
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$8,500,000
1$1,650,000
1$1,100,000
1$725,000
Trades
BOS
  1. 2020 5th round pick (LAK)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,454,814$964,222$0$1,045,186
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,650,000$1,650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$1,100,000$1,100,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$950,000$950,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 16, 2020 at 3:30 a.m.
#1
GoCanada
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 532
Excellent Job done! If a CBO does occur does that mean Krejci is gone and Frederick gets called up?
Apr. 16, 2020 at 3:37 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,130
Likes: 12,158
Quoting: jassan28
Excellent Job done! If a CBO does occur does that mean Krejci is gone and Frederick gets called up?


What? David Krejci is a really good 2C, and he's only got one year left, why on earth would they buy him out?

The Bruins are going on a Cup March next year, and unless they're going to sign/trade for a younger, cheaper 2C option Krejci is definitely still that guy. Studnicka looks to be the guy of the future, but he's not ready.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 4:53 a.m.
#3
GoCanada
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 532
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
What? David Krejci is a really good 2C, and he's only got one year left, why on earth would they buy him out?

The Bruins are going on a Cup March next year, and unless they're going to sign/trade for a younger, cheaper 2C option Krejci is definitely still that guy. Studnicka looks to be the guy of the future, but he's not ready.


What's up with Trent Frederick then he was the next elite center in my mind after they traded Donato
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:49 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,522
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
What? David Krejci is a really good 2C, and he's only got one year left, why on earth would they buy him out?

The Bruins are going on a Cup March next year, and unless they're going to sign/trade for a younger, cheaper 2C option Krejci is definitely still that guy. Studnicka looks to be the guy of the future, but he's not ready.


I think we see Studnicka go to #3C next year and Coyle will either move to Krejci's RW or he'll stay on the 3RW and mentor Studnicka. He could also slide into that 3C role if Studnicka struggles or in the case of a FO, gets thrown out of the dot.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:04 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Could get DeBrusk for lower, under $4M if it's a bridge deal. Bjork, couple $100K less. For Grzelcyk, I wouldn't take $2,2M as he's really underpaid.

Like the AHL/prospects signings.

Krug, would try to target 6/7 years and doubt he gets $8,5M. A bit less.

Hopefully Moore is moved/Miller isn't re-signed.

Also, Chara will return.

Studnicka likely starts as 3RW.
And Brossoit could be a good add if he plays last year
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:08 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: jassan28
What's up with Trent Frederick then he was the next elite center in my mind after they traded Donato


Frederic* and at the time of his selection, Bruins already knew he was going to be a bottom-6 C. Led AHL in PIM this year and was pretty good (overall). He could play some games in the NHL next year
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:22 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,130
Likes: 12,158
Quoting: jassan28
What's up with Trent Frederick then he was the next elite center in my mind after they traded Donato


Trent Frederic and "elite" don't belong in the same sentence. 3rd or 4th liner.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:33 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,522
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: bhavikp27
Could get DeBrusk for lower, under $4M if it's a bridge deal. Bjork, couple $100K less. For Grzelcyk, I wouldn't take $2,2M as he's really underpaid.

Like the AHL/prospects signings.

Krug, would try to target 6/7 years and doubt he gets $8,5M. A bit less.

Hopefully Moore is moved/Miller isn't re-signed.

Also, Chara will return.

Studnicka likely starts as 3RW.
And Brossoit could be a good add if he plays last year


Agree on DeBrusk, the smart play (for both sides) is a bridge deal. I'm not capologist, but looking around at some comps, maybe 2/3 years around $3.5 million. Grz a similar boat as DeBrusk shorter deal around $2.5 million, but I could see it being higher. Krug I'm with you on. 6yr maybe $7 million per. Chara I could see coming back for $1 million with bonuses, so they'll need a bit of extra cap space. The back-up goalie is an interesting one. I was trying to think outside the box and was kicking the idea of Ryan Miller around. Would be a really cheap option, maybe 1yr/$1 million.

Disagree on Studnicka though. I think if they were willing to let him play RW he would have been up already this season. Obviously things can change at any given moment, but it telling that they haven't played him there in either the AHL or his pre-season games.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:43 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: ON3M4N
Disagree on Studnicka though. I think if they were willing to let him play RW he would have been up already this season. Obviously things can change at any given moment, but it telling that they haven't played him there in either the AHL or his pre-season games.


Studnicka was really good in the A this year and no doubt he will be a great C. Complete 200-foot player. But hard to play him in the top9 C right away with Bergeron, Krejci, Coyle. #13 can play wing but anyone who watched him knows he's much more effective at C. Also, Studnicka would have less responsibilities. Looking forward to see what's the Bruins plan. He certainly has more more offensive upside than Wagner or Kuhlman who played there in the past two years. And he can play C if there is any injury.

He did play two games this year but it was the good thing to send him back to Providence. Let him dominate the AHL (as he did) and when he comes up, he's 100% ready. He would have probably played some games at NHL level if it wasn't for the pause.

Not saying Bruins can't develop (as it's false) but they can't make a mistake there. Studnicka is their best prospect and they really need someone to replace Bergeron/Krejci for the future. So take as much time you need.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:52 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,522
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: bhavikp27
Studnicka was really good in the A this year and no doubt he will be a great C. Complete 200-foot player. But hard to play him in the top9 C right away with Bergeron, Krejci, Coyle. #13 can play wing but anyone who watched him knows he's much more effective at C. Also, Studnicka would have less responsibilities. Looking forward to see what's the Bruins plan. He certainly has more more offensive upside than Wagner or Kuhlman who played there in the past two years. And he can play C if there is any injury.

He did play two games this year but it was the good thing to send him back to Providence. Let him dominate the AHL (as he did) and when he comes up, he's 100% ready. He would have probably played some games at NHL level if it wasn't for the pause.

Not saying Bruins can't develop (as it's false) but they can't make a mistake there. Studnicka is their best prospect and they really need someone to replace Bergeron/Krejci for the future. So take as much time you need.


Correct, Coyle is a better C than RW. How much better I'm not entirely sure. As always plans can change, but imo it just seems there are a few signs that Boston does not want to play Studnicka at RW (some I mentioned in my previous post). Where do you see the concern with playing him as a #3C? As you pointed out he was a very good 200ft player this year in the AHL (I believe he led the league in shorty's too) and is their best C prospect. 3-4 years from now do you see him as surpassing a guy like Coyle on the depth chart?
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:55 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: ON3M4N
Correct, Coyle is a better C than RW. How much better I'm not entirely sure. As always plans can change, but imo it just seems there are a few signs that Boston does not want to play Studnicka at RW (some I mentioned in my previous post). Where do you see the concern with playing him as a #3C? As you pointed out he was a very good 200ft player this year in the AHL (I believe he led the league in shorty's too) and is their best C prospect. 3-4 years from now do you see him as surpassing a guy like Coyle on the depth chart?


With Coyle's contract, it sounds like Bruins see him as the next 2C when/if Krejci is gone.

And no problem with playing him as 3C, just not sure how it would work with the Bruins current three Cs...
Apr. 16, 2020 at 9:39 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Krug stays - for 6750000

Griz gets more

OTHER THAN THAT: this is pretty damn good!
Apr. 16, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,522
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: bhavikp27
With Coyle's contract, it sounds like Bruins see him as the next 2C when/if Krejci is gone.

And no problem with playing him as 3C, just not sure how it would work with the Bruins current three Cs...


It'll be interesting to see what happens with Coyle. I think he could be a serviceable #2C, but he lacks the offensive production to be a true #2C. I'm looking for more than 40pts out of my #2C and maybe that isn't realistic and we've been spoiled w/ Krejci. You could be right though and they see him as a their future #2C.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 11:07 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: ON3M4N
It'll be interesting to see what happens with Coyle. I think he could be a serviceable #2C, but he lacks the offensive production to be a true #2C. I'm looking for more than 40pts out of my #2C and maybe that isn't realistic and we've been spoiled w/ Krejci. You could be right though and they see him as a their future #2C.


Not ideal when you play with Brett Ritchie/David Backes... His line with Heinen and Bjork was great but for whatever reason, Cassidy didn't like that. This season, they wanted Bjork to play a more complete game, he does and now if he doesn't produce, they put a 4th liner on their line and scratch him smh

Keep Bjork and Studnicka but let them play together regularly and Coyle could get past 50 pts. He needs a consistent winger to build chemistry with. Otherwise, it's normal this team lacks secondary scoring
Apr. 16, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,522
Likes: 4,568
Quoting: bhavikp27
Not ideal when you play with Brett Ritchie/David Backes... His line with Heinen and Bjork was great but for whatever reason, Cassidy didn't like that. This season, they wanted Bjork to play a more complete game, he does and now if he doesn't produce, they put a 4th liner on their line and scratch him smh

Keep Bjork and Studnicka but let them play together regularly and Coyle could get past 50 pts. He needs a consistent winger to build chemistry with. Otherwise, it's normal this team lacks secondary scoring



Maybe the data is wrong, but it looks like Coyle only played 25 minutes with Backes this year. His 3 most common linemates were Bjork, Heinen and DeBrusk. Even still, Coyle was roughly a 40pt player with Minnesota as well. Maybe he's just had crappy linemates his whole career? Although Krejci hasn't exactly had great linemates for a handful of years now and he's still been around a 60pt center.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 1:36 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 111
Likes: 40
Quoting: bhavikp27
Could get DeBrusk for lower, under $4M if it's a bridge deal. Bjork, couple $100K less. For Grzelcyk, I wouldn't take $2,2M as he's really underpaid.

Like the AHL/prospects signings.

Krug, would try to target 6/7 years and doubt he gets $8,5M. A bit less.

Hopefully Moore is moved/Miller isn't re-signed.

Also, Chara will return.

Studnicka likely starts as 3RW.
And Brossoit could be a good add if he plays last year


I only moved Moore and kept Miller because GM Don Sweeney already came out and said he's re-signing Miller this offseason.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,591
Likes: 5,462
Quoting: Erik8798
I only moved Moore and kept Miller because GM Don Sweeney already came out and said he's re-signing Miller this offseason.


I did same but again, it's an offer. If Miller doesn't like it, he won't return. So that's why I hope he doesn't re-sign
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll