SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins Playoff Line-Up Idea

Created by: ON3M4N
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: May 27, 2020
Published: May 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Slightly different look for a playoff line-up.

1st line - Status quo

2nd line - Yes Coyle is a better Center than RW, however some of Krejci's best possession and advanced numbers have come playing with Coyle at 5v5. While being a "better center", Coyle is also a good and effective RW. To be honest having DeBrusk on the LW wasn't my first choice, but DeBrusk has played with both guys and they had decent number in the 50 minutes they played together at 5v5

3rd line - My initial idea was to roll DeBrusk - Studnicka - Bjork as Studs and Bjork played together a bit in Providence (albeit brief) and DeBrusk/Bjork's possession/advanced numbers look to be better when they play together. However this would have forced Kase to play his off-wing which he has never done, so that foiled that plan. The third line ends up being interesting though. All 3 guys are 200ft players, good skaters and can be a nuisance to teams trying to break out of their own zone. It could actually be a surprising line if they click offensively.

4th line - Pretty status quo, but Ritchie moves down for a heavy 4th line that can play physical

Defense/Goaltending - status quo
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
30$81,500,000$80,884,759$0$3,252,500$615,241
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$117,500$118K)
RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 28, 2020 at 6:47 p.m.
#26
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 893
Likes: 259
Quoting: ON3M4N
Charlie McAvoy had zero NHL experience and played 26 minutes a night when he debuted in the playoffs. Studnicka also would be taking Nordstrom's roster spot and lets be honest, that's not a huge loss.

Quote:
Besides, it is not like Coyle looked any better at RW. Coyle needs to play center, he makes the third line have great depth.


Its about making the 2nd line better and the overall team better. I'm not sold on a line of Ritchie/Krejci/Kase and while the sample size is small, they played nearly identical time together as DeBrusk/Krejci/Coyle. The advanced stats between the two are night and day:

CF%
NR/OK: 48.1%
JD/CC: 50.8%

SF%
NR/OK: 45.8%
JD/CC: 54.6%

xGF%
NR/OK: 42.8%
JD/CC: 62.8%

SCF%
NR/OK: 53.9%
JD/CC: 59.0%

HDCF%
NR/OK: 40.0%
JD/CC: 61.1%

I'm also of the thought that having Studnicka at your #3C doesn't hurt your depth, which lead to your next point....

Quote:
Also, not a chance you can convince me Studnicka is better defensively than Coyle. Coyle was killing penalties on the second unit and was looking like a monster on that unit.


Coyle was 7th among B's forwards in SH TOI and averaged 54 seconds of SH TOI per game. If he was "a monster" he'd be in the top 4 among forwards. As for Studnicka, I'm lucky enough to have 4 AHL teams within a few hours of me and two of them within 30 minutes of my house, so I get to see a lot of games. Studnicka right now is on par/if not better than Coyle defensively and is a threat offensively (led the AHL in SHG). I've seen the kid play quiet a bit this year in person, have you?

Quote:
All im saying is: we're all excited for Stunicka. But there is absolutely 0 need to rush him into this lineup. Call him up for practices, but he shouldn't play unless he absolutely has to. You play Studnicka next season and go from there.


You put your team in the best situation to win a cup now, like you said we're in win now mode. Studnicka is an upgrade over Nordstrom and DeBrusk/Coyle w/ Krejci is an upgrade over Ritchie/Kase w/ Krejci.



I can tell your a big analytics guy. But your analytics aren’t qualifying right now. Coyle was on the second unit PK and getting regular reps on it before the season pause. Don’t look at his time because he was inserted late into the season.

Your comparing a corsi stat when Kase has played a WHOPPING 6 games. Would you like to talk about Coyles regular season stint last season with the bruins when he got traded here? Wasn’t pretty huh? Let’s give Kase more games before you bring up Corsi lol

And the Charlie McAvoy scenario is MUCH different than Jack Studnicka’s. Are you forgetting how injured the bruins D core was during that 2017 playoff run? Of course he had to play, I would hope he’d be a better option than Joe Morrow or Tommy Cross.

This bruins team was dominant without Jack Studnicka. This whole team has finals experience besides Kase, Bjork, Ritchie, and Lauzon. Why would you fool around with the team when this was the best team in hockey this year? You keep the lineups that worked.

Give Kase and Ritchie more games before you whip out stats
May 28, 2020 at 8:17 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,505
Likes: 4,566
Quote:
I can tell your a big analytics guy. But your analytics aren’t qualifying right now. Coyle was on the second unit PK and getting regular reps on it before the season pause. Don’t look at his time because he was inserted late into the season.

Your comparing a corsi stat when Kase has played a WHOPPING 6 games. Would you like to talk about Coyles regular season stint last season with the bruins when he got traded here? Wasn’t pretty huh? Let’s give Kase more games before you bring up Corsi lol

And the Charlie McAvoy scenario is MUCH different than Jack Studnicka’s. Are you forgetting how injured the bruins D core was during that 2017 playoff run? Of course he had to play, I would hope he’d be a better option than Joe Morrow or Tommy Cross.

This bruins team was dominant without Jack Studnicka. This whole team has finals experience besides Kase, Bjork, Ritchie, and Lauzon. Why would you fool around with the team when this was the best team in hockey this year? You keep the lineups that worked.

Give Kase and Ritchie more games before you whip out stats


So DeBrusk/Coyle have equal 5v5 TOI with Krejci as Kase/ Ritchie but we can't compare stats? Seems like a great comparison as the sample size is the same.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll