SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Post Lottery Plan

Created by: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 27, 2020
Published: Jun. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$7,000,000
2$4,000,000
4$4,500,000
2$2,500,000
3$5,500,000
2$3,250,000
2$1,000,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
3$5,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,750,000
1$2,500,000
1$1,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Retained Salary, Olofsson
2$2,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
  2. Sergachev, Mikhail [RFA Rights]
TBL
  1. Jokiharju, Henri
  2. Olofsson, Victor
  3. 2020 1st round pick (BUF)
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Olofsson half retained
2.
BUF
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,873,334$1,487,500$3,700,000-$373,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,250,000$3,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Retained Salary, Olofsson
$2,000,000$2,000,000

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 27, 2020 at 10:36 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Riley816
Agree. The team above has 6 players to protect in the expansion draft. And Skinner is only because his NMC. They are no better than this year and don't have a draft pick until the 4th round...


It's playing the long game. Cirelli and Sergachev are 22 years old. A trade for either one of them isn't gonna be cheap. I'd love to see a Lightning fan comment to see their opinion on this trade.
Jun. 27, 2020 at 11:06 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
It's playing the long game. Cirelli and Sergachev are 22 years old. A trade for either one of them isn't gonna be cheap. I'd love to see a Lightning fan comment to see their opinion on this trade.


Tampa has no want or need for Mittlestadt, who they'd have to re-sign and likely ends up either in Syracuse or on the 4th line. Tampa likely isn't moving either player, as they are integral to not only the win now plan but also represent a large part of the future core. If Tampa considered moving both however, a deal like the one you proposed is what it would take. Cirelli has, perhaps, a slightly higher chance of being moved, but the oft proposed "deal" of 8OA+Mittlestadt, or even funnier, Cirelli+2nd for 8OA and Mittlestadt would meet a quick pass from Brisebois. Neither of these pieces help Tampa now in their prime Cup window. If Buffalo wants him, then it starts with Cozens or Jokiharju plus a 2nd at minimum, which at least makes Brisebois consider. Tampa isn't taking a magic bean and maybe a 4C next year for their 2C that is only getting better.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 12:55 a.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: JTBF81
Tampa has no want or need for Mittlestadt, who they'd have to re-sign and likely ends up either in Syracuse or on the 4th line. Tampa likely isn't moving either player, as they are integral to not only the win now plan but also represent a large part of the future core. If Tampa considered moving both however, a deal like the one you proposed is what it would take. Cirelli has, perhaps, a slightly higher chance of being moved, but the oft proposed "deal" of 8OA+Mittlestadt, or even funnier, Cirelli+2nd for 8OA and Mittlestadt would meet a quick pass from Brisebois. Neither of these pieces help Tampa now in their prime Cup window. If Buffalo wants him, then it starts with Cozens or Jokiharju plus a 2nd at minimum, which at least makes Brisebois consider. Tampa isn't taking a magic bean and maybe a 4C next year for their 2C that is only getting better.


Yeah I agree with you. Te truth is that Tampa has to move at least one of CIrelli or Sergachev unless a lot of their players waive their NTC.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 1:13 a.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,125
Likes: 1,640
Post Lottery Plan "Move team to Quebec"
Jun. 28, 2020 at 1:33 a.m.
#30
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Boomer125
Post Lottery Plan "Move team to Quebec"


I don't think Quebec wants this mess. They'll wait for Florida.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 1:53 a.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Yeah I agree with you. Te truth is that Tampa has to move at least one of CIrelli or Sergachev unless a lot of their players waive their NTC.


Tampa can keep both even if none of the 3 full NYC waive. It becomes easier if one does, of course, but if needed a buy out of one also should be enough along with the other moves to get it done. The main player that may have to go is Cernak if one doesn't waive, but he's third on the rfa keep list behind Serg and Cirelli.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 12:47 p.m.
#32
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: JTBF81
Tampa can keep both even if none of the 3 full NYC waive. It becomes easier if one does, of course, but if needed a buy out of one also should be enough along with the other moves to get it done. The main player that may have to go is Cernak if one doesn't waive, but he's third on the rfa keep list behind Serg and Cirelli.


I just don't see the cap space. How are they gonna sign Cernak, Sergachev and Cirelli with 5M in cap space? Even if they move out Killorn I don't think 9.5M is enough for all 3 either.

After playing around with Tampa I found the only way to keep all 3 is to trade Vasilevsky or if Gourde and Johnson waive.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 3:28 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I just don't see the cap space. How are they gonna sign Cernak, Sergachev and Cirelli with 5M in cap space? Even if they move out Killorn I don't think 9.5M is enough for all 3 either.

After playing around with Tampa I found the only way to keep all 3 is to trade Vasilevsky or if Gourde and Johnson waive.


As I said, Cernak may have to be traded, but Serg and Cirelli are the top priorities and they will get re-signed after Tampa trades Killorn, Paquette and either trade or buy out one of Gourde/Johnson. Cernsk should stay if one of Gourde/Johnson are moved fully, perhaps not if one had to be bought out. Tampa won't start the year with 23, they'll be at 21 or 22.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 3:32 p.m.
#34
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: JTBF81
As I said, Cernak may have to be traded, but Serg and Cirelli are the top priorities and they will get re-signed after Tampa trades Killorn, Paquette and either trade or buy out one of Gourde/Johnson. Cernsk should stay if one of Gourde/Johnson are moved fully, perhaps not if one had to be bought out. Tampa won't start the year with 23, they'll be at 21 or 22.


They don't have the cap space even with your suggestions. You buy out Gourde you pay 2M in dead cap for the next 10 years.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 9:53 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
They don't have the cap space even with your suggestions. You buy out Gourde you pay 2M in dead cap for the next 10 years.


They most certainly do, many iterations of the team have already been done with keeping Serg and Cirelli. Tampa won't be handing these rfa's monster long term deals like some teams choose to do. Both are very likely to sign 2 or 3 year bridges in the 4 to 4.5 range(less for Cirelli than Serg), and with either a buy out of one of the three or trading them they have more than enough space for a 21 or 22 player roster. It's also not 2 million a year every year, some are less. It wouldn't be ideal, but it is not crippling to the team and is far more preferable to losing either Serg or Cirelli. Much more likely though that they get one of the three to waive, and then Tampa negotiates the best deal they can, even if it's not great, in order to keep all 3 rfas.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 10:00 p.m.
#36
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: JTBF81
They most certainly do, many iterations of the team have already been done with keeping Serg and Cirelli. Tampa won't be handing these rfa's monster long term deals like some teams choose to do. Both are very likely to sign 2 or 3 year bridges in the 4 to 4.5 range(less for Cirelli than Serg), and with either a buy out of one of the three or trading them they have more than enough space for a 21 or 22 player roster. It's also not 2 million a year every year, some are less. It wouldn't be ideal, but it is not crippling to the team and is far more preferable to losing either Serg or Cirelli. Much more likely though that they get one of the three to waive, and then Tampa negotiates the best deal they can, even if it's not great, in order to keep all 3 rfas.


I'd like tp see that. Can you link me?
Jun. 28, 2020 at 10:22 p.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Edited Jun. 28, 2020 at 10:28 p.m.
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I'd like tp see that. Can you link me?


https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/embed/1766183"

Here's one I made recently, some of the trades would need to be altered, but the basis remains similar. It's a 21 player roster here with a buy out of Gourde. Any trade of him, Johnson or Palat likely allows for them to keep Cernak and run 22, maybe even 23. It's not perfect, but Brisebois and his team are better at this than most fans and no doubt have a plan in place even with the loss of ~3 million in cap.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.
#38
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: JTBF81
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/embed/1766183"

Here's one I made recently, some of the trades would need to be altered, but the basis remains similar. It's a 21 player roster here with a buy out of Gourde. Any trade of him, Johnson or Palat likely allows for them to keep Cernak and run 22, maybe even 23. It's not perfect, but Brisebois and his team are better at this than most fans and no doubt have a plan in place even with the loss of ~3 million in cap.


I can't see Sergachev taking 4.5M. He has similar numbers to McDonaugh when McDonaugh signed his contract and McDonaugh's AAV was brought down by giving him way too much term.

I think Cirelli has to go unless someone waives their NTC.
Jun. 29, 2020 at 12:06 a.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 556
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I can't see Sergachev taking 4.5M. He has similar numbers to McDonaugh when McDonaugh signed his contract and McDonaugh's AAV was brought down by giving him way too much term.

I think Cirelli has to go unless someone waives their NTC.


That's fine, Serg at 4.5 is more than fair, maybe 4 75. His comparables took 4.9 and 5 on bridges(McAvoy and Werenski). Tampa gets their rfa's to take less every time, they know how the system works. Tampa won't be losing either Cirelli or Serg and will continue to be a top 3 or 4 contender for awhile. Tampa knows they are vital to the current window and as future core stars, they aren't losing them. If Tampa was one of a few teams that usually hand inflated contracts to their rfa's, then I'd be concerned with losing one or both of them. As it is, they are not and with both players having an increased role and in a great location, the chances are quite high they will follow every other rfa in Tampa lately and sign a bridge that still gives them a significant raise and keeps them on a top cup contender. They'll then get a nice 8 year payday when more money is available in 3 years.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll