SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NYR Big Trade

Created by: Dave31
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2020
Published: Jul. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A massive trade with NYR could solve almost all of the Sharks issues, as well as free up some serious cap for the Rangers who need to sign Kakko, Fox, Georgiev, and DeAngelo within the next couple years at a flat cap. Strome for a 1st could be a one for one deal to free up a ton of cap space for NYR. Georgiev for Merkley and a 3rd would be a solid deal considering NYR doesn't need to go into next year with three goalies and Merkley could add to their already stacked young blue line. Sorensen for Lemieux would be a roster player trade for both teams at a low cap hit (Sorensen with more scoring potential). As well, give NYR Korenar just so they have another young 3rd string goalie to play in the AHL and develop. Sharks could then sign Simmonds and Maroon to fill out the lineup and bring in some much needed physicality.

*I originally had Shesterkin in the trade but switched it to Georgiev to make it more fair*
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$3,000,000
4$4,800,000
3$3,500,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
1$800,000
2$1,000,000
2$3,000,000
Trades
SJS
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [RFA Rights]
  2. Lemieux, Brendan [RFA Rights]
  3. Strome, Ryan [RFA Rights]
NYR
  1. Korenar, Josef
  2. Merkley, Ryan
  3. Sörensen, Marcus
  4. 2020 1st round pick (TBL)
  5. 2021 3rd round pick (PIT)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$74,280,000$0$212,500$7,220,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,800,000$4,800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 13, 2020 at 4:27 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 74
Likes: 22
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Yeah I realized you changed the trade afterwards. I think it helps both teams out in the respect. Gives you guys a solid goalie option, plus Strome who in your top 6 should still be a 50 point player at the min. The 1st is essentially the second 2nd we would want for Georgie and Strome. Leaves us cap room and some extra maneuvering to go out and make another move or something.


Thats exactly how I was looking at it as well! It fills our massive holes in net and up front, and clears a ton of space for you while still giving you great future assets to either use or flip. A lot of Sharks fans would tell me its too much to give up on our end but I think getting a goalie and top 6 guy needs to be our priority over our future.
Jul. 13, 2020 at 4:30 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: JDavid
Hell I would throw in Gregor along with them if it got it done


I hear ya. I think it could work.
Jul. 13, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 74
Likes: 22
..
Jul. 13, 2020 at 4:36 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 2,868
Quoting: JDavid
I completely see your point, we have so few prospects that its hard to move our best one. I guess to me it comes down to priorities, and if we are still in "win now" mode or not. Merkley can be incredible, but at the end of the day he's a prospect and is part of a future plan. If we want to win now then we cant focus on the future, and have to do whats best for us in the present and Georgiev and Strome can solve a lot of our current issues. Lemieux is just someone that could give our 4th line some identity and bring some youth to the team, but that part of the trade isn't as crucial. What return would you expect to give up for Strome and Georgiev?


Yeah all good points for sure. I'm not too keen on getting rid of Merkley, but I guess my point is that trading him would have to feel worth it. According to Doug, it sounds like we are still in 'win now mode' so I'd be inclined to believe acquiring Georgiev and Strome isn't outside the realm of possibilities.

For me, Strome and Georgiev are worth the Tampa first, our 2nd, and Gambrell. That's just straight up value wise. I've seen plenty of Ranger fans value both Strome and Georgiev as worth the 2020 2nd (SJS) so I think what I've proposed is enough for sure. Plus the Rangers get a smooth skating Center to fit into their system.

If we were considering moving Merkley, I'd propose this trade:

To SJS: Ryan Strome, Alexandar Georgiev, Brett Howden, 2020 4th (NYR)

To NYR: Ryan Merkley, 2020 2nd (SJS), Dylan Gambrell
Jul. 13, 2020 at 4:48 p.m.
#30
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 74
Likes: 22
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Yeah all good points for sure. I'm not too keen on getting rid of Merkley, but I guess my point is that trading him would have to feel worth it. According to Doug, it sounds like we are still in 'win now mode' so I'd be inclined to believe acquiring Georgiev and Strome isn't outside the realm of possibilities.

For me, Strome and Georgiev are worth the Tampa first, our 2nd, and Gambrell. That's just straight up value wise. I've seen plenty of Ranger fans value both Strome and Georgiev as worth the 2020 2nd (SJS) so I think what I've proposed is enough for sure. Plus the Rangers get a smooth skating Center to fit into their system.

If we were considering moving Merkley, I'd propose this trade:

To SJS: Ryan Strome, Alexandar Georgiev, Brett Howden, 2020 4th (NYR)

To NYR: Ryan Merkley, 2020 2nd (SJS), Dylan Gambrell


I like that trade for sure, but personally I didn't add Gambrell just cause were gonna need as many centers as we can get once Jumbo retires and we don't have any high prospects in that position. Id much rather move Sorensen, but I know thats less appealing to NYR which is why I added the extra 3rd rounder in the trade to even it out. If NYR would accept Strome and Georgiev for TB's 1st, Avs 2nd, Pens 3rd next year, and Sorensen that would be ideal, but idk if that would be the best offer they would get
Jul. 13, 2020 at 5:01 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 2,868
Quoting: JDavid
I like that trade for sure, but personally I didn't add Gambrell just cause were gonna need as many centers as we can get once Jumbo retires and we don't have any high prospects in that position. Id much rather move Sorensen, but I know thats less appealing to NYR which is why I added the extra 3rd rounder in the trade to even it out. If NYR would accept Strome and Georgiev for TB's 1st, Avs 2nd, Pens 3rd next year, and Sorensen that would be ideal, but idk if that would be the best offer they would get


Yeah I'd rather move Sorensen too, but Gambrell I think fits the Rangers' system much better which is why I traded him instead. Not a big deal though, just a minor difference. I would really like Strome and Georgiev for Tampa 1st, Avs 2nd, Pens 3rd and Sorensen, but I'm not too sure how the Rags would feel about it. I dunno it's tough to gauge.
Jul. 14, 2020 at 10:37 a.m.
#32
ChytilMania
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 294
Quoting: JDavid
Same trade but Georgiev instead then? Hell, with our current goaltending Im not picky Ill take either lol


As a Ranger fan, I would absolutely take the same deal with Georgiev instead but you would be overpaying.
Jul. 14, 2020 at 4:24 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 74
Likes: 22
Quoting: ChytilMania
As a Ranger fan, I would absolutely take the same deal with Georgiev instead but you would be overpaying.


I agree it would be a lot on our end to give up, but with our current situation we gotta put a goalie and Top 6 guy as a priority over picks and prospects. That being said, with Georgiev it would be much more likely to be a 2nd round pick instead of a 1st and still be a fair trade
ChytilMania liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll