SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

would this work

Created by: KeepUps15
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 28, 2020
Published: Jul. 28, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Who accepts and declines?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,700,000
4$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
1$2,750,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. 2022 5th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
ANY TEAM
2.
CGY
  1. Faksa, Radek [RFA Rights]
DAL
  1. Jankowski, Mark [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (CGY)
3.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$71,445,832$0$1,307,500$10,054,168
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:24 a.m.
#1
RangerWall92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 989
Boston fans are gonna be on your case for trading them another mid-6 forward
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:27 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,628
Likes: 5,472
Quoting: RangerWall92
Boston fans are gonna be on your case for trading them another mid-6 forward


Ryan is good but we don't need him and OP said any team so it doesn't matter.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:29 a.m.
#3
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,482
Regardless if these deals work or not, what have you accomplished?
This roster doesnt seem noticeably stronger than what you had to start with?
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:36 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 6,647
YES
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:41 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 6,647
Does Derek Ryan play a smart two way game with good skating?
KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:46 a.m.
#6
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Does Derek Ryan play a smart two way game with good skating?


Absolutely. He's also strong in the face off dot.
KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:48 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Absolutely. He's also strong in the face off dot.


Great. I'll take him in NYR for that price!
KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:51 a.m.
#8
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Great. I'll take him in NYR for that price!


For sure, just about any team would, they'd be dumb not to, because at the very least they could flip him at the deadline for a much larger return. Obviously the OP was just trying to clear cap space, I doubt the Flames would move Ryan for that low of a price.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:54 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: McRanteskog
Regardless if these deals work or not, what have you accomplished?
This roster doesnt seem noticeably stronger than what you had to start with?


I think I have accomplished a bit here. It is suppose to be simple a but a bit of upgrades. Faksa is an underrated 2c who will most likely fit in Calgary's defense system. Backlund is a solid 2c but is an elite 3c. Thats why flames fans want a 2c so badly. Lias Andersson I think still has a lot of upside

Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Great. I'll take him in NYR for that price!


Would adding that to the Andersson for Kylington trade (so basically Ryan and Kylington for a 5th and Andersson)?
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:54 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: keep_ups12
I think I have accomplished a bit here. It is suppose to be simple a but a bit of upgrades. Faksa is an underrated 2c who will most likely fit in Calgary's defense system. Backlund is a solid 2c but is an elite 3c. Thats why flames fans want a 2c so badly. Lias Andersson I think still has a lot of upside



Would adding that to the Andersson for Kylington trade (so basically Ryan and Kylington for a 5th and Andersson)?


Yeah no prob with me!
Jul. 28, 2020 at 9:57 a.m.
#11
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Radek Faksa is not really a 2C though, he has a career high of 17 goals and 33 points. Really strong defensive player though.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 10:01 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 147
If Gorton can move Lias for Kylington, good for him! And that would basically complete the NYR defense.
KeepUps15 liked this.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#13
MMBzFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 281
Bruins won’t have the cap room next year. Flat cap.

But Ryan is serviceable for other teams no doubt.
Jul. 28, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 264
these r all solid & realistic moves imo, well done
Jul. 28, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#15
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,673
Likes: 3,064
Wouldn’t count on Faksa being your long-term fix at the 2C spot, but he CAN play the position until you get your true 2C.

Think of him as Jankowski 2.0. What Jankowski does for a Calgary, Faksa will do a little bit better.

Personally, the deal is fine, but if I’m Dallas I’d probably look for more of an offensive piece than Jankowski. The whole reason Dallas an trade Faksa is because we have smart defensive Centers like Dickinson & Dellandrea that can take his spot. Jankowski would be kind of redundant for the Stars.

What would a deal look like involving Mangiapane or Dube for Faksa?
Jul. 28, 2020 at 3:17 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: TheMooterus
Wouldn’t count on Faksa being your long-term fix at the 2C spot, but he CAN play the position until you get your true 2C.

Think of him as Jankowski 2.0. What Jankowski does for a Calgary, Faksa will do a little bit better.

Personally, the deal is fine, but if I’m Dallas I’d probably look for more of an offensive piece than Jankowski. The whole reason Dallas an trade Faksa is because we have smart defensive Centers like Dickinson & Dellandrea that can take his spot. Jankowski would be kind of redundant for the Stars.

What would a deal look like involving Mangiapane or Dube for Faksa?


Your counter offer is horrible. I would take mangiapane and dube over faksa. I wouldn't do mangiapane for faksa and a second. I think this offer is fair as it is. if you want you could have bennett
Jul. 28, 2020 at 4:59 p.m.
#17
True Reverse Retro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 4,673
Likes: 3,064
Quoting: keep_ups12
Your counter offer is horrible. I would take mangiapane and dube over faksa. I wouldn't do mangiapane for faksa and a second. I think this offer is fair as it is. if you want you could have bennett


I wasn’t insinuating a 1-for-1. Add pieces as you wish. I was asking what a deal would look like involving ONE of Magiapane or Dube for Faksa. No s*** it wouldn’t be a 1-for-1.

And I never said the deal wasn’t fair (actually said the opposite). I said a guy like Jankowski is simply redundant for Dallas.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll