SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pittsburgh Fans

Created by: BreKel
Team: 2016-17 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 19, 2016
Published: Sep. 19, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the FLA
2018
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2019
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$73,000,000$63,768,334$0$515,000$9,231,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$925,000$925,000
RW
UFA - 1
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RW
UFA - 2
$600,000$600,000
LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$6,916,667$6,916,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
$1,200,000$1,200,000
G
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 19, 2016 at 10:02 p.m.
#1
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Stop, please. It's stupid.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 12:53 a.m.
#2
BombSquad
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 613
Likes: 22
Thank you. As a Pens fan, I am equally annoyed with seeing this 5 times a day on here. One exhibition tournament does not mean that unrealistic blockbuster deals will start happening.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 7:50 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: BombSquad
Thank you. As a Pens fan, I am equally annoyed with seeing this 5 times a day on here. One exhibition tournament does not mean that unrealistic blockbuster deals will start happening.


Exactly. Adding to my overall point.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 8:57 a.m.
#4
IgorKutchakokov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 561
Likes: 61
Agree. Dumbest thing ever. LGP

Quoting: BombSquad
Thank you. As a Pens fan, I am equally annoyed with seeing this 5 times a day on here. One exhibition tournament does not mean that unrealistic blockbuster deals will start happening.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 10:09 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,649
Likes: 6,777
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 11:10 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: F50marco
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.


I don't see this trade as one that is realistic. The Bruins would never move Bergeron. I think Marchand is pretty untouchable as well. To package them BOTH and only get back Malkin? I just don't see that as realistic at all.

Malkin = Top 3-5 center in the league
Bergeron = Top 10 center in the league

Marchand = top 20 LW in the leauge

Bruins are getting hosed, and for a slight upgrade at center. They lose offense in the trade, they lose their best PK pair in the trade. It's just unrealistic.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 12:03 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,649
Likes: 6,777
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.


I don't see this trade as one that is realistic. The Bruins would never move Bergeron. I think Marchand is pretty untouchable as well. To package them BOTH and only get back Malkin? I just don't see that as realistic at all.

Malkin = Top 3-5 center in the league
Bergeron = Top 10 center in the league

Marchand = top 20 LW in the leauge

Bruins are getting hosed, and for a slight upgrade at center. They lose offense in the trade, they lose their best PK pair in the trade. It's just unrealistic.


I don't disagree with you. Makes no sense for Boston and i certainly wouldn't do it. Just saying that the whole point of the AGM is to propose trades. Whether we like them or not. By all means tell them it sucks but I hate when people tell other posters to stop posting their ideas. Frankly, a bigger pet peeve of mine is when people post an AGM just to make a statement. It just clutters the AGM section. There's a section for discussing these types of things without having to submit an AGM but nobody uses it for some reason.....

If only the good and realistic AGM's were permitted, there would only be 2 posted per day.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 12:56 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.


I don't see this trade as one that is realistic. The Bruins would never move Bergeron. I think Marchand is pretty untouchable as well. To package them BOTH and only get back Malkin? I just don't see that as realistic at all.

Malkin = Top 3-5 center in the league
Bergeron = Top 10 center in the league

Marchand = top 20 LW in the leauge

Bruins are getting hosed, and for a slight upgrade at center. They lose offense in the trade, they lose their best PK pair in the trade. It's just unrealistic.


I don't disagree with you. Makes no sense for Boston and i certainly wouldn't do it. Just saying that the whole point of the AGM is to propose trades. Whether we like them or not. By all means tell them it sucks but I hate when people tell other posters to stop posting their ideas. Frankly, a bigger pet peeve of mine is when people post an AGM just to make a statement. It just clutters the AGM section. There's a section for discussing these types of things without having to submit an AGM but nobody uses it for some reason.....

If only the good and realistic AGM's were permitted, there would only be 2 posted per day.


The point of my post is because I keep seeing the same trade scenarios over and over. After commenting on 2-3, the same thing, it gets old.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 1:03 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,649
Likes: 6,777
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.


I don't see this trade as one that is realistic. The Bruins would never move Bergeron. I think Marchand is pretty untouchable as well. To package them BOTH and only get back Malkin? I just don't see that as realistic at all.

Malkin = Top 3-5 center in the league
Bergeron = Top 10 center in the league

Marchand = top 20 LW in the leauge

Bruins are getting hosed, and for a slight upgrade at center. They lose offense in the trade, they lose their best PK pair in the trade. It's just unrealistic.


I don't disagree with you. Makes no sense for Boston and i certainly wouldn't do it. Just saying that the whole point of the AGM is to propose trades. Whether we like them or not. By all means tell them it sucks but I hate when people tell other posters to stop posting their ideas. Frankly, a bigger pet peeve of mine is when people post an AGM just to make a statement. It just clutters the AGM section. There's a section for discussing these types of things without having to submit an AGM but nobody uses it for some reason.....

If only the good and realistic AGM's were permitted, there would only be 2 posted per day.


The point of my post is because I keep seeing the same trade scenarios over and over. After commenting on 2-3, the same thing, it gets old.


Believe I know what you mean, see how many Emelin for Yakupov trades, Habs fans make......Its nauseating but that's what people want. whether its plausible or not.

I get your point. Its just that who cares if it gives you heartburn or makes me nauseous, that's not their concern.
Sep. 20, 2016 at 4:29 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: F50marco
I have no problem with crazy out of this world blockbusters. Thats what this site is for, guys. Don't like it? Comment and tell them how bad it is. That's how this thing works.

What I do have a problem is when they propose these crazy trades but they aren't even somewhat realistic. Now their just trolling.


I don't see this trade as one that is realistic. The Bruins would never move Bergeron. I think Marchand is pretty untouchable as well. To package them BOTH and only get back Malkin? I just don't see that as realistic at all.

Malkin = Top 3-5 center in the league
Bergeron = Top 10 center in the league

Marchand = top 20 LW in the leauge

Bruins are getting hosed, and for a slight upgrade at center. They lose offense in the trade, they lose their best PK pair in the trade. It's just unrealistic.


I don't disagree with you. Makes no sense for Boston and i certainly wouldn't do it. Just saying that the whole point of the AGM is to propose trades. Whether we like them or not. By all means tell them it sucks but I hate when people tell other posters to stop posting their ideas. Frankly, a bigger pet peeve of mine is when people post an AGM just to make a statement. It just clutters the AGM section. There's a section for discussing these types of things without having to submit an AGM but nobody uses it for some reason.....

If only the good and realistic AGM's were permitted, there would only be 2 posted per day.


The point of my post is because I keep seeing the same trade scenarios over and over. After commenting on 2-3, the same thing, it gets old.


Believe I know what you mean, see how many Emelin for Yakupov trades, Habs fans make......Its nauseating but that's what people want. whether its plausible or not.

I get your point. Its just that who cares if it gives you heartburn or makes me nauseous, that's not their concern.


Thats just me having fun with it. I'm not 100% serious about it. You'll know if I am. I just know that Bergeron will never be traded and it is awful to see him in any proposal, nevermind a lopsided one, that's been posted time after time lately due to a few WCH games. We can end it here though, I think we understand where each other is coming from.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll