ROUND 1 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
1 | - | Right now best of a 2020 class and NHL ready. Safe and easy pick. 10 years from now likely still top 3 player from his draft class. | ||
2 | - | Byfield has higher ceilling, but Stutzle will have impact sooner... Marco Sturm and Kopitar both speak German, he will adopt well. | ||
3 | Rare combination of size and skill you don't pass on. He needs another season in juniors, delayed season 20/21 hurts others more. | |||
4 | - | He is commited to NCAA team in 2020/21, so here DET addresses long-term need on LD. His offense is limited, but is safe pick... | ||
5 | - | RW goal scorer from 67's. 52-goal scorer in shortened season, despite he scored only 12 in 18/19. OTT needs more right-shot Fs. | ||
6 | - | ANA drafts by position here and not necesserely by BPA. Safe pick, top pairing potential, but he will have to put more weight on. | ||
7 | - | Goal scorer, sniper. He can compete against men and NJD is short on RW. NHL size, in juniors regularly better than Raymond. | ||
8 | - | Keep an eye on him. He scored in his SHL season debut (PPG top corner snipe) and might rise his value before draft. Slim frame. | ||
9 | - | If LA would draft Byfield, would OTT take Rossi at 3. OHL isn't a challenge for him. Small player, but is hard to knock off the puck. | ||
10 | - | Better on a W, but might become C. WHL guy with off the charts season, by far best scorer on a team. Small, but excellent skater. | ||
11 | - | Very likely unfit to play C. Smart player, but there are some awareness about his skating and defensive play. Offense is there. | ||
12 | - | FLO restocked F depth with Trocheck trade, so they take RHD here. Might end on 3rd pairing, but can compete for a job right away. | ||
13 | In any system there is always a place for another C, so Finnish colony in CAR increases. His development slowed down in 2019/20. | |||
14 | - | NJD trades up with picks #18, #84 and 2021 3rd rounder. Blackwood is present, Askarov is future. Might end as top 5 from class. | ||
15 | Potential goal-scorer. Scored 12 goals in DEL, Stutzle only 7. Attitude issues, but playing in NHL... Good in internationals. | |||
16 | - | Decent player on a bad Sarnia, good goalscorer. NHL bloodlines usually overcomes attitude issues. Homeboy in MTL, no pressure... | ||
17 | - | In 1st rounds has CHI been taking (almost) ready kids. Has a size and speed. Offense isn't there yet, but he might end on 1st pairing. | ||
18 | EDM pick. Opposite of their first team, EDM's prospect pool is thin on C. Solid back-to-back seasons, despite questionable skating. | |||
19 | - | There is only one D-men prospect below 23 years in CGY (Valimaki, will turn 22 soon). Younger D-man who scored 20, decent size. | ||
20 | Can compete against men. Big RHDs are premium and NJD reaches for one. Their LHD pool looks fine, they need help on RHD. | |||
21 | - | CBJ is desperate for D-men prospects, but not over Bourque. Perfect fit, CBJ like smart players who are working through whole 200ft. | ||
22 | Despite might end as W in NHL, NYR will try him at C. Commited to NCAA team in 2020/21, probable AHL seasoning in 2021/22. | |||
23 | - | PHI prospect pool is relatively strong on C, so he would probably play RW. Their core is aging, he will get a chance for NHL soon. | ||
24 | - | His shoot is good enough, but should add 20+ lbs of muscles and play physically. Draft slowly opens, he could slide to 2nd round. | ||
25 | - | Good stats in part due to weak division. His skating and attitude are questionable. WAS is relatively strong on C, will likely play RW. | ||
26 | - | STL is without 2nd rounder. Not satisfied with Cs available, so they reach for RHD. NHL size, good skater, but needs to learn a lot. | ||
27 | NTDP's best scorer. Small players are allways risky, but NHL bloodlines usualy make it to the NHL. Commited to NCAA team. | |||
28 | Big D-man who is starting to transfer his offense from juniors to KHL. Strong start to the 2020/21 KHL season. Legit 1st rounder. | |||
29 | - | Played physically on strong Chicago and is comitted to NCAA team. VGK has balanced prospect pool, but might use natural RW. | ||
30 | - | DAL thinks Amirov can follow Gurianov's footsteps and develop into NHLer. Mukhamadullin's teammate, struggles in KHL. | ||
31 | Big and strong C from NTDP is Northern-CA born. There are reaches in any draft, he is my candidate. Tools for legit NHLer. |
ROUND 2 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
32 | - | I can see DET draft Sanderson at #4 and small C at #32. Simmilar caliber as Bordeleau and already producing against men. | ||
33 | - | OTT throws a flyer on him. Playmaker, injury prone, but they can risk. You just can't have too many centers in a franchise. | ||
34 | - | SJS might want to delay rebuilding for a 2-3 years and this energetic RW could be ready for a bottom NHL role relatively soon. | ||
35 | - | Big D-man has a lot of work ahead. Another one with all the tools, but needs to learn a game. Struggled in Allsvenskan. | ||
36 | - | ANA can use another RHD in prospect pool. Despite defensively oriented is he good skater. Suitable for starts in own zone and PK. | ||
37 | Appereantely are NAS sold on him. Huge riser in 2019/20 season, but I wonder how much was his performance affected by team. | |||
38 | - | RHD BUF needs is classical puck-moving D. Suitable for exits/entries from/into the zones. Can improve both his defense and offense. | ||
39 | - | Teams that missed D-men in a 1st round are drafting them in 2nd. MIN has a hole on a left side and they can use physical player there. | ||
40 | - | RHD overager, Jarvis' teammate. WIN doesn't select until 5th round and they need RHD. Decent size, 20G and 67P in 63 games. | ||
41 | CAR can use a physical F. Holloway isn't that yet, but he has a size to be transformed into one. Slightly struggled in 1st NCAA year. | |||
42 | - | NAS takes 2nd G from the table. Rather than continuation with Finns, they select one from USA. NTDP produces starter potentials. | ||
43 | - | Smilanic is a project. He has the tools, is a good skater, but his problem is pure hockey sense. At least 3 years away from NHL. | ||
44 | - | Small offensive D-man from AJHL. High risk – high reward pick. He could very well be drafted much earlier in the 2nd round. | ||
45 | Left-shot RW. Seider's countrymen likely owns just bottom lines potential. Competing against men and is good without a puck. | |||
46 | Robins is good skater. Late bloomer who improved his offense in 2019/20 significantly. Dach's teammate in juniors, prefers to play C. | |||
47 | - | Francophone RHD. Poirier's linemate with simmilar stats, but better defensive play. Decent size, but his skating is questionable. | ||
48 | Big W ends in MTL. It is his scoring potential that attracts Bergevin, but could be more physical. Played mostly in juniors. | |||
49 | - | Lic Mysak | Draft Pick Forfeited | |
50 | - | Lic's brother is offensively oriented player. Good skater and shooter. Needs to add some muscles and play overall more physically. | ||
51 | Jarventie is bigger LW who can score and can play physicaly. Point-per-game player against men in 2nd Finnish division. | |||
52 | OTT has few G prospects, but nobody looks like legit starter. Same can be said for Bednar, but someone of them will make it. | |||
53 | - | Greig is going to 3rd Swedish league in 2020/21. That is not optimal for a player of his caliber. But another potential power F for CAR. | ||
54 | - | PHI is without 3rd round pick and could reach for overage physicall D-man from NCAA. He plays as NHLer and could be drafted in 3rd. | ||
55 | Foudy reminds me of ex-SJS pick Norris. He would do well if there would be Combine. He is work in progress, but good with a puck. | |||
56 | DET takes G project. Seen as a starter potential, but has a contract in Finland until 22/23. Smaller goalies are often boom-or-bust. | |||
57 | Kid is younger and huge, but right now average player. MTL could develop him into at least 3C shutdown role (Adam Lowry type). | |||
58 | - | Neighbours is physical type of player BOS fans will like. Also brings decent offense, but his stocks have dropped during the year. | ||
59 | Decent player on a bad North Bay. RW OTT needs, has NHL size and brings some offense. They count on him to be power F. | |||
60 | LA can use natural RW in system. Sourdif is physical enough to earn some games on bottom lines, but his upside looks limited. | |||
61 | Cormier's combination of smaller size and average skating hurts his value. But he plays very smart in all three zones of the ice. | |||
62 | - | It was meant to be. Yzerman's doctrine lives on in TBL. Despite his smaller stature are they taking skilled LW from a bad team. |
ROUND 3 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
63 | - | DET is mostly set on RHD and can only add some LHDs. Jurmo is another one with NHL size and physical style of play. | ||
64 | - | OTT continues with stockpiling Cs. His size makes him risky pick, but of many risk picks someone will become a star in the NHL. | ||
65 | 3rd DET's D-man has some offensive potential. Decent performance on weaker NTDP team from 2019/20. DET's defense looks set. | |||
66 | - | Another puck-moving D-man who can help a team exit from own end. Smaller player, but LA can use another RHD in a few years. | ||
67 | - | |||
68 | Despite saga with Shipacyov are the VGK not shy of drafting Russians. Decently adopted to KHL, but has mediocre ceilling. | |||
69 | Big defensive D-man from NCAA. His ceilling appears to be limited to lower pairings. It should be a safe pick if he stays in NA. | |||
70 | He missed entire 2018/19 season, but showed good offensive upside in 2019/20. However, he still needs to be tested against men. | |||
71 | Tuch looks like a player with high certainity of making NHL and low ceilling. But OTT has a place for physical LW with NHL size. | |||
72 | - | NYR prospect pool is almost empty on RHD. Powell is good skater, but beside that he is mostly average player and rather 4th rounder. | ||
73 | - | NAS adds bigger D-man they need. One more with likely limited offense, but probably big and good enough for at least AHL job. | ||
74 | - | Farrell played on strong Chicago, so his offensive numbers should be taken with caution. But there is NHL potential, for sure. | ||
75 | COL adds another RW. Laferriere was point-per-game on a bad team, so there is some offensive potential. Can play physically. | |||
76 | I assume EDM will retain 2020 pick. Big C/LW from EDM area will be valuable for their future depth, starting in AHL. They need that. | |||
77 | - | PIT is only in a win-now mode. Sokolov in QMJHL is man among boys. His NHL frame will be tested soon among equals. | ||
78 | - | MTL adds G to their selections. Hlavaj is overager with good size, with decent performances in QMJHL and poor in internationals. | ||
79 | - | Daws is 2 years older and overall balanced G. Immediate solution for CHI AHL affiliate, but expect of CHI another G in lower rounds. | ||
80 | Shawn Wright's linemate adopted to NA rinks smoothly and they cooperated very well. Skilled player, but must be more physical. | |||
81 | Small and light LW from NTDP is not shy of playing physical. He has offensive upside, but once again, smaller players are risky. | |||
82 | - | VAN takes well balanced C (BPA). They have some wings, Juolevi and Woo on D, DiPietro in G, but are almost empty on C. | ||
83 | LA has enough of skills and have added some muscles. They have one of best goalie farms and are not shy of taking smaller Gs. | |||
84 | EDM pick from Askarov trade. Persson has shown some upside, but the sample size is small. He will come to WHL in 2020/21. | |||
85 | Scoring LW from Swedish junior league. Played in SHL shortly, but wasn't able to transfer his offense there yet. High upside. | |||
86 | FLO's wild card is offensive W. Is not afraid to be physical and stand for teammates, despite being small. Going from OHL to Belarus. | |||
87 | Ridiculous stats for player from USHS-MN. High bust potential, but STL don't have legit 1C or 2C in a pool. They take a risk. | |||
88 | - | Classical stay-at-home D man with NHL size and physical style of play. But also prone to bad and unnecesserely penalties. | ||
89 | - | Thompson played on a good team, so take his offensive output with caution. BOS needs RHD and Thompson can be at least AHLer. | ||
90 | - | Small offensive D-man plays big, what might not be enough for NHL. But what can NYI lose in late 3rd round? They can gain a lot. | ||
91 | - | Nothing really stands out for Viro, but he is reliable enough to play against men. Plays safe, is fast enough, is just too slim. | ||
92 | ˝Russian factor˝ made Ponomarov fall to the NYR. Offensive talent is obvious in internationals, but not completely in QMJHL. | |||
93 | - | Power forward with NHL size and some offensive upside. TBL managed to get player with high certainity of becoming NHLer. |
ROUND 4 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
94 | Small and slim offensive D-man has huge upside, but has barely played over 40 games in the past 2 seasons combined. | |||
95 | - | LW from AJHL is offensive threat. Smaller player, but has some weight on his frame and is physical enough for NHL tryout. | ||
96 | G after D-man and F for CGY. Clang is 6ft2, moves his legs fast and cuts the angles. Played on weak team, he has NHL potential. | |||
97 | - | He has high upside. What holds him back is a combination of his average stature and average skating. Played briefly in SHL. | ||
98 | MTL risks with 5ft6.5 LW. He has decent stature given his height and his offensive potential is worth of risk. Some SHL experience. | |||
99 | - | Overage RD is strong skater, good on both ends of the ice, including goal-scoring. Going from juniors to Allsvenskan in 2020/21. | ||
100 | - | BUF also draft overager. Kuntar was by far the best scorer on a team, is well balanced player and can play NHL-style. | ||
101 | - | Point per game player on by far the worst team in USHL. Big LW can also be physical and has the size. NHL potential here. | ||
102 | Player from NT could go to MTL. Seeley is on the younger side of prospects. This mobile D-man is gaining momentum. | |||
103 | - | NYR adds playmaking RW. Skills are not questionable, but for NHL he must reduce the number of errors and become stronger. | ||
104 | His speed is not questionable, but he was not able to rise his play to the next level (yet). Overshadowed by teammates. | |||
105 | - | Nothing stands out for Sebrango. Nicely balanced D-man has NHL upside and very well could be drafted in 3rd round. | ||
106 | - | Shane Wright's linemate. That fact definitely boosted his offensive numbers, but he is at least good skater on his own. TOR native. | ||
107 | 2-way C played on a weak team and significantly improved in 2019/20, scored 30 G. Another decent C for DET's prospect pool. | |||
108 | - | LW is physical player. His development slowed down in 2019/20. Overshadowed by teammates and mediocre offensive output. | ||
109 | - | Vierling is average player at this stage and plays in a weak division. But he is younger prospect and plays C, he might improve. | ||
110 | - | If you think all Swedish D-man are soft, Loof might make you change your mind. A type of player you would like to have in a playoffs. | ||
111 | - | Ambrosio is small C from USHL. Best scorer on a team, point per game, not afraid to be physical, fast and creative player. | ||
112 | LA should stockpile D-man prospects. His skating is among best between D-man, but must be better on his own end. | |||
113 | - | Big and heavy RHD from WHL is right now stay-at-home. Someone will reach for him, maybe VAN, and try make him all-around. | ||
114 | - | Shortened season was still long for Moose Jaw. Lots of heavy minutes for Hunt, who struggled after the injury and also scored 0G. | ||
115 | - | Right-shot to balance CAR's left-shots. RW or C, can improve in all areas. Another one with NHL bloodlines and they often made it. | ||
116 | - | Simmilar, RHD to balance LHDs. Mobile D-man who plays safe game without a risk. Returning to Finland, likely some Liiga games. | ||
117 | - | COL has good Cs int pool, they add another W. Has size, has talent, but it remain to be seen if he will be sucessful in KHL and NHL. | ||
118 | - | Good D-man in a bad league. Heading to good Chicago Steel in 2020/21 and to NCAA in 2021/22. High risk – high reward pick. | ||
119 | - | Perunovich looks like successful experimet. STL tries again with lower pick, this time with small offensive D-man from QMJHL. | ||
120 | Carwell has decent shot and has improved his skating and strenght. He is on the right path, but still far away from NHL. | |||
121 | - | NYI throws a flyer on 6ft0 G with excelent stats... in CCHL. He will be tested properly in NCAA. High risk – high reward. | ||
122 | Another player from mediocre Greyhounds who did a bit of everything. Overager who improved significantly in 2019/20. TOR native. | |||
123 | - | RHD DAL needs. He comes from strong Chicago, going to NCAA in 2020/21 where he will have to play against better opponents. | ||
124 | - | Another smaller player who contributes offensively and can play physical. But it is worth of note that his skating is just average. |
ROUND 5 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
125 | - | Another left-shot RW for DET. Small goal-scorer is dominant in FIN U-20. Going to NCAA in 2020/21, will face tougher opponents. | ||
126 | It seems unlikely to me Galimov ever comes in the NHL or makes his impact there. But 21-years old is making an impact in KHL... | |||
127 | - | After 4 Fs SJS drafts big physical defensive D-man from KHL. He might stay in KHL and not much offense here, but worth a risk. | ||
128 | - | |||
129 | - | |||
130 | - | |||
131 | - | |||
132 | - | |||
133 | - | |||
134 | - | |||
135 | - | |||
136 | ||||
137 | ||||
138 | - | |||
139 | - | |||
140 | ||||
141 | - | |||
142 | - | |||
143 | - | |||
144 | - | |||
145 | - | |||
146 | ||||
147 | - | |||
148 | - | |||
149 | - | |||
150 | - | |||
151 | - | |||
152 | - | |||
153 | ||||
154 | - | |||
155 |