SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not sure how I feel about this...

Created by: redw1n9s
Team: 2016-17 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 9, 2016
Published: Nov. 9, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
WPG
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. 2017 1st round pick (DET)
2.
DET
  1. 2017 2nd round pick (COL)
3.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the DET
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the DET
2018
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2019
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$70,403,823$550,000$1,015,000$2,596,177
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,083,333$6,083,333
C
UFA - 5
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
$3,325,000$3,325,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
C
UFA - 2
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$661,667$661,667 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,850,000$3,850,000
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 5
$628,333$628,333 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 7
$628,333$628,333
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
$2,075,000$2,075,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$3,308,824$3,308,824
RD
UFA - 2
$5,291,666$5,291,666
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
$1,150,000$1,150,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
$625,000$625,000
RD
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,954,545$3,954,545
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$1,116,667$1,116,667
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 9, 2016 at 1:52 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
I could see these working value wise. Not sure the other teams are getting what they want though. Other than maybe the Anaheim trade.
Nov. 9, 2016 at 1:55 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
redw1n9s
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 572
I am sure there is a team that is willing to take on Smith, not sure if it's Colorado though. Mantha for Fowler has been discussed, and while I am not crazy about it, this defense needs to be upgraded so desperately. The Mrazek trade is the toughest to stomach. I won't know how I feel about that for at least 3 years, if it happens.
Nov. 9, 2016 at 2:30 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
With Fowler doing good right now i think Detroit would have to throw in a 2nd or 3rd as well
Nov. 9, 2016 at 3:37 p.m.
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,613
Likes: 22,720
Unless the Jets are unhappy with their goaltending, I don't see why they would make the deal. They have "plenty" of goaltenders. And that first rounder, maybe if it's in the top 10, but 20th, may certainly not.
Nov. 10, 2016 at 9:20 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: Wolford16
With Fowler doing good right now i think Detroit would have to throw in a 2nd or 3rd as well
Totally agree it would've to be Mantha+Detroit either 2nd or 3rd round pick to get Fowler out of Anaheim but it sounds like Bob Murray really wants Mantha maybe next summer we can work out a trade here.
Nov. 10, 2016 at 9:22 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
I like all these trades, Though i don't see Holland trading Mrazek just yet. Detroit would need to add either a 2nd or 3rd onto Mantha in the Fowler deal other then that not bad trades.
Nov. 10, 2016 at 7:52 p.m.
#7
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 1,448
Probably like a complete homer...
Nov. 10, 2016 at 10:03 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 67
Likes: 2
Edited Nov. 10, 2016 at 11:28 p.m.
Wpg, Ana are not in positions that these trades need to be made. Det is the one in need, going to have to create holes elsewhere to fill others for significant trades.
Accept a fate of middling or a rebuild and compile draft picks
Honestly you think this is enough talent to challenge Wash, Pits, NYR, Mtl.
Nov. 14, 2016 at 1:02 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
4 stars for creativity. Not 5 because it hurt my feelings thinking about Mrazek being traded. But in all serious. Not terrible trades at all. Wish Tatar could go instead of mantha. A solid forward with size that can score is something we've lacked since franzen hit his downhill a couple years ago. And Tatar seems like he needs a change
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll