Quoting: CD282
Holloway is 1.6 P/GP in NCAA right now. Nick Paul was 0.69 P/GP in a lower league in his draft+1. That's an extremely unintelligent take.
Holloway has had a hot start to his season, that's true, but he was not so great in the WJC. Remember, he's playing with Cole Caufield now, and a lot of that increase is from that. Yes they were both playing there last season, but that doesn't put them on the same line last year. Holloway may continue to have a great season, but until he does, it's just a hot start.
Holloway will be a good NHL player, but like a lot of prospects, they aren't what we want them to be. Holloway will be a middle6 forward, and if he's as good as Nick Paul, that's a good thing, if he's better, that's great, but he doesn't have that ceiling yet, and playing with Caufield isn't going to change that, despite the hot start.
Edit: as for Nick Paul's development, he's a late bloomer, so compare earlier numbers all you want, some players develop later, and some are great in college and never make the NHL. It is what it is, and you're entitled to think anything you want about your teams prospects, in the end, we have nothing to do with their careers, and can only chat about it, and make up trade scenarios and argue over them. Don't let your ego cloud your vision. Holloway is a good prospect, be glad your team has him.