Quoting: BruinsCharlies
Not worried about DeBrusk. He scored 19 goals last year and when you first proposed this trade before you went way off tangent I said you had to hold onto him since this trade is for the now. You won't discuss my trade proposal based on your original proposal so I'm respectfully out.
I did. It's a solid hard no. Too much. There is just no way you give up Beecher and Studnicka and Vaakanianen, plus 1st, and Zboril.
Assuming Zboril it taken by Seattle. That's four pieces under control for a 6-7 years each. I don't see a world which they can afford to resign both in two years. The Bruins have a ton of depth at wing in their system, & they seem to really be able to draft and develop defensemen. Lohrei, Ahcan, & Berglund willbe the next wave. They have not been able to develop a center since Krejci. It seems like Studnicka, and Beecher actually be good. I can't give them both up, and be looking at the same center group they currently have, but two years older
You were the one who made the assumption that Kase was in for salary reasons. He wasn't. He was in because he is good, young and under team control. Type of guy you can keep or flip or hold a year and flip for a worst case 2nd rd pick.
The deal I Made only works because it pretty much means you have another year to get a center. Resign krejci for one and Develop Beecher. With the real plan being sign Barkov, but since FLA is now winning those odds are going down.
I guess my greater point with Debrusk was pointing out your inconsistencies in logic. Debrusk scored 27 got absolutely lit up in the playoffs and was clearly concussed, had a down season had a 25% drop in goal production and now has started with 1 goal in 10 games, having already missed time this season with a LBI.