Quoting: Mwasylko34
Kakko is in his second year and has not done much of anything. I get he is young but Eichel as a 2nd overall clearly is better than Kakko at 2nd overall. Eichel for 5 years with Panarin will bring NY a cup if they can add better depth pieces. You're crazy to not want to give up at least 2 top prospects for an elite center. And with the draft picks, this years draft and next years draft are not very good so that should not hold back a trade
Again you are just looking at goals and assists and not play driving. This years top 8 prospects are still very good pieces to have (power, Hughes, beniers, Johnson, eklund, edvinsson, Clarke, and lambos) while next year is supposed to be the best in recent history (Wright, savoie, lambert) are all supposed to be franchise changers.
Meanwhile, Miller is already a top 4 defenseman when ppl said he would need a year, and with how dynamic of a skill set and how big he is at 6’5” he has the raw tools to be a top pairing defenseman.
I get asking for the moon and stars but like I said Buffalo will end up with a return much less than posts here show. Simply because the rangers have built a top pipeline in the nhl and probably have the best group 23 and under. LA and Ottawa are the only ones in the same realm.
Fox
Lafreniere
Kakko
Miller
Lundkvist
Chytil
Kravtsov
Schneider
Barron
Etc.
If rangers let Lundkvist, Barron, kravtsov and a roster player like Zibanejad, buchnevich, Strome plus a top pick in this years draft I just don’t see any other team beating that. It’s all gonna come down to if eichel forces a trade, once his nmc kicks in he’s going to have a lot more say in where he goes and it’ll lessen the amount Buffalo will get back