SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Exploring options for Eichel

Created by: MelonVK
Team: 2021-22 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: May 11, 2021
Published: May 12, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don't think there's really an issue in finding teams with assets to trade for Eichel. The issue is finding teams with assets to trade for Eichel that still have the surrounding cast to compete for a cup after obtaining him. Could LA give up Byfield and do it? Sure, but Kopitar might finally descend to earth in a season or two, Doughty is already pretty bad, and all of a sudden you're 30 mil deep into the cap with only really Eichel to show for it, while you're simultaneously not filling up the roster with high-end talent from the draft anymore - cause it's gone into trading for Jack Eichel.

I think these teams suggested have rosters they can re-tool and compete with, even after obtaining Eichel. So in reality, I wouldn't suggest for Chicago to do this, but I still think they could.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Eichel, Jack
5$10,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. Lindgren, Ryan
  3. Lundkvist, Nils [Reserve List]
  4. 2022 1st round pick (NYR)
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Eichel, Jack
2.
BUF
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Greenway, Jordan
  3. Johansson, Filip [Reserve List]
  4. 2021 1st round pick (MIN)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Eichel, Jack
3.
BUF
  1. Aho, Sebastian
  2. Skjei, Brady
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CAR)
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Eichel, Jack
4.
BUF
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Eichel, Jack
5.
BUF
  1. Glass, Cody
  2. Karlsson, William
  3. Tuch, Alex
  4. 2021 1st round pick (VGK)
  5. 2022 2nd round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Eichel, Jack
6.
BUF
  1. Dach, Kirby
  2. Kane, Patrick
  3. Kurashev, Philipp
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (CHI)
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (VGK)
  6. 2022 2nd round pick (CHI)
CHI
  1. Eichel, Jack
7.
BUF
  1. Askarov, Yaroslav [Reserve List]
  2. Fabbro, Dante [RFA Rights]
  3. Johansen, Ryan
  4. Tolvanen, Eeli [RFA Rights]
  5. 2021 1st round pick (NSH)
  6. 2022 1st round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Eichel, Jack
8.
BUF
  1. Laine, Patrik [RFA Rights]
  2. 2021 1st round pick (TBL)
  3. 2021 1st round pick (TOR)
CBJ
  1. Eichel, Jack
9.
BUF
COL
  1. Eichel, Jack
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the COL
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
33$81,500,000$112,013,333$113,916$7,722,500-$30,513,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,050,000$3,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$889,166$889,166
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,166,667$3,166,667
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 12, 2021 at 5:03 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: OnlyBadDeals
How does a player that has been injured the entire season and said that he has not been treated yet trend upwards? Eichel's injury is to concerning to consider giving up Aho


He was better last season too if that helps. I'm saying in the 20 games or whatever he played he was way better.
May 12, 2021 at 6:12 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,396
Likes: 9,039
Quoting: MelonVK
Nice... So we *are* back at "Rantanen is better because Rantanen is better". I didn't gloss over any of those stats, they are accounted for. Or did you think a literal shot map ignored the corsi/fenwick aspect? These are the things that are included in xG-models... And then we resort back to "well Rantanen makes more money and should make more money" which, again, is a re-writted version of "Rantanen is better because Rantanen is better". I'm sorry you felt like your intellect was under attack, but I can't really take responsibility for that.


Not back any where. You’re wrong. Rantanen is better you want to refuse he scores at double the rate DeBrusk. He has better metrics in basically every category. Tell me a single GM that would outright swap the 2 straight up. Literally just one. Rantanen scores more. He has more assists. He has a better shooting percentage. He has a better corsi. He has better fenwick. Hell this year his +/- is +24 better. But you think you have found some altruistic measure of players. If that was the case that would be the only stat anybody cared about. Is it? I’m done don’t bother responding, because you won’t address why Rantanen has better numbers. Douche
May 12, 2021 at 7:59 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: Xqb15a
Not back any where. You’re wrong. Rantanen is better you want to refuse he scores at double the rate DeBrusk. He has better metrics in basically every category. Tell me a single GM that would outright swap the 2 straight up. Literally just one. Rantanen scores more. He has more assists. He has a better shooting percentage. He has a better corsi. He has better fenwick. Hell this year his +/- is +24 better. But you think you have found some altruistic measure of players. If that was the case that would be the only stat anybody cared about. Is it? I’m done don’t bother responding, because you won’t address why Rantanen has better numbers. Douche


Nice. So you didn't read my post addressing all those points. Got it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll