SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dnvr chaos

Created by: gkingery07
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 26, 2021
Published: Jul. 26, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
5$6,000,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Compher, J.T.
  3. Ranta, Sampo
  4. 2022 1st round pick (COL)
  5. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Formenton, Alex
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (OTT)
3.
COL
  1. Twarynski, Carsen [RFA Rights]
SEA
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (OTT)
4.
CGY
  1. Bowers, Shane
  2. Newhook, Alex
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (COL)
  4. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,671,269$1,741,463$3,007,500$1,828,731
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 26, 2021 at 1:15 a.m.
#1
Flames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 383
No, Flames laugh at you and hang up.
Jul. 26, 2021 at 3:05 a.m.
#2
we love the avs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 35
Likes: 7
Quoting: Ansabch12
No, Flames laugh at you and hang up.


Think you're off there, maybe another prospect/Pick but we're well within ballpark in terms of pure value. Now, from a franchise goal standpoint, this maybe makes less sense, but the value's there
Jul. 26, 2021 at 10:32 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 1,246
OTT declines
Jul. 26, 2021 at 8:19 p.m.
#4
Flames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 383
Quoting: OldBaySeasoningOfficial
Think you're off there, maybe another prospect/Pick but we're well within ballpark in terms of pure value. Now, from a franchise goal standpoint, this maybe makes less sense, but the value's there


I really don't understand how you see it like that, Shane Bowers is a B tier prospect, the pick is in 2024 from a team thats likely top 5 in the league, a pretty pointless 2nd from again a team thats likely top 5 in the league, and Alex Newhook is a great value piece im not parting with my best player and future captain for that package. If Byram isn't involved in the trade its a pretty easy no from the Flames.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 1:11 p.m.
#5
we love the avs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 35
Likes: 7
Quoting: Ansabch12
I really don't understand how you see it like that, Shane Bowers is a B tier prospect, the pick is in 2024 from a team thats likely top 5 in the league, a pretty pointless 2nd from again a team thats likely top 5 in the league, and Alex Newhook is a great value piece im not parting with my best player and future captain for that package. If Byram isn't involved in the trade its a pretty easy no from the Flames.


You're gonna over value him just like I'm gonna overvalue Landeskog, I don't care if he's *your team's* best player, 2-3 high picks 2-3 three mid-high prospects is plenty fair for a 60-70 point top-15 guy. That's absolutely the starting point lmao. Like I said, maybe throw in an extra pick and/or prospect bc of CO's prospects, but my point was that's the value, in a vaccuum is there. Now, that's a rebuilding blow-it-up move, and it doesn't necessarily seem like that's where CGY is, so yes, this trade doesn't make sense, and under that context, it absolutely would take more to pry him away, BUT in a vaccum the value's there.

You're not gonna get Byram + prospects and picks if you want that trade, value wise. Byram projects as a top-15 NHL defensemen, you could *maybe* get Byram + low-mid prospect or mid pick.

My point's about sheer value, the sheer value is there. The context and what CGY as an org. are trying to do make this trade untenable, hence why it would require more.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 1:12 p.m.
#6
we love the avs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 35
Likes: 7
Quoting: Ansabch12
I really don't understand how you see it like that, Shane Bowers is a B tier prospect, the pick is in 2024 from a team thats likely top 5 in the league, a pretty pointless 2nd from again a team thats likely top 5 in the league, and Alex Newhook is a great value piece im not parting with my best player and future captain for that package. If Byram isn't involved in the trade its a pretty easy no from the Flames.


That trade is the equivalent of the "The value's there but this doesn't meet our trade block needs" message in NHL Be a GM mode lmao.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 9:13 p.m.
#7
Flames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 383
Quoting: OldBaySeasoningOfficial
You're gonna over value him just like I'm gonna overvalue Landeskog, I don't care if he's *your team's* best player, 2-3 high picks 2-3 three mid-high prospects is plenty fair for a 60-70 point top-15 guy. That's absolutely the starting point lmao. Like I said, maybe throw in an extra pick and/or prospect bc of CO's prospects, but my point was that's the value, in a vaccuum is there. Now, that's a rebuilding blow-it-up move, and it doesn't necessarily seem like that's where CGY is, so yes, this trade doesn't make sense, and under that context, it absolutely would take more to pry him away, BUT in a vaccum the value's there.

You're not gonna get Byram + prospects and picks if you want that trade, value wise. Byram projects as a top-15 NHL defensemen, you could *maybe* get Byram + low-mid prospect or mid pick.

My point's about sheer value, the sheer value is there. The context and what CGY as an org. are trying to do make this trade untenable, hence why it would require more.


I can't argue that because you're absolutely right in a vacuum the projection you said for Tkachuk's value is definitely that, but the trade you offered in my opinion is not equal to the value you stated, the 2-3 high picks, and the 2-3 mid-high prospects. Because your pick is extremely low, Shane Bowers wouldn't interest me at all if i'm GMBT, Newhook is the only player in there that interests me. But if im giving up Matthew Tkachuk I need more than just Newhook to interest me, otherwise the answers no.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll