SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chicago contend now

Created by: Deaner37
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 27, 2021
Published: Jul. 27, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
2$900,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
2.
CHI
  1. 2022 6th round pick (WPG)
3.
CHI
  1. 2022 4th round pick (PHI)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (PHI)
4.
CHI
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Krys, Chad
  2. 2022 4th round pick (PHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$62,330,047$452,439$3,382,500$19,169,953
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$997,500$997,500
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 27, 2021 at 12:58 p.m.
#1
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Canucks decline
Jul. 27, 2021 at 1:02 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 39
Likes: 8
I think you messed up that Canucks trade a little bit. If Ristolainen can get a 1st, a defenceman, and a 2nd round pick, Schmidt can AT LEAST get a 1st or couple of 2nd's, yet you want the Canucks to give up a 2nd and 3rd?! LOL absolute clown. Never post again.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 1:13 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
He ain’t gonna play with the hawks anyway. Vegas ripped his heart out and the only team he will play for now is probably Pittsburgh.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 1:17 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 233
Quoting: Phyzsics
I think you messed up that Canucks trade a little bit. If Ristolainen can get a 1st, a defenceman, and a 2nd round pick, Schmidt can AT LEAST get a 1st or couple of 2nd's, yet you want the Canucks to give up a 2nd and 3rd?! LOL absolute clown. Never post again.


Canucks need to shed salary to sign Hughes, Pettersson etc ... Buffalo didn't need to shed salary therefore Buffalo had a lot more leverage.
Canucks won't be in a position to demand a 1st or couple 2nds like you suggested ... GM's know they are desperate for cap space .... clown
Jul. 27, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 39
Likes: 8
Quoting: hawksfan1988
Canucks need to shed salary to sign Hughes, Pettersson etc ... Buffalo didn't need to shed salary therefore Buffalo had a lot more leverage.
Canucks won't be in a position to demand a 1st or couple 2nds like you suggested ... GM's know they are desperate for cap space .... clown


Oh, the Canucks need to shed cap space for Hughes and Pettersson do they? Oh... that's interesting... what about the 20 mil we have right now even after signing Garland to a 5 mil AAV extension..? What about the extra 3 mil we get for putting Ferland on LTIR..? Interesting... let's overpay here and do some math. Let's say Pettersson and Huges get 9 mil each, that's 18, then let's say 3.5 for Dickinson, now we're up to 21.5... wait a minute... 21.5? that's under our 23 million total cap limit? But I thought you said we needed cap space? I just overpaid all three players and still fit them under our cap..?

LOL ABSOLUTE CLOWN. I love when kids try and come back at me with a smart tone like they have a CLUE what they're talking about LMAO. Absolute joke.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 7:42 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 233
Quoting: Phyzsics
Oh, the Canucks need to shed cap space for Hughes and Pettersson do they? Oh... that's interesting... what about the 20 mil we have right now even after signing Garland to a 5 mil AAV extension..? What about the extra 3 mil we get for putting Ferland on LTIR..? Interesting... let's overpay here and do some math. Let's say Pettersson and Huges get 9 mil each, that's 18, then let's say 3.5 for Dickinson, now we're up to 21.5... wait a minute... 21.5? that's under our 23 million total cap limit? But I thought you said we needed cap space? I just overpaid all three players and still fit them under our cap..?

LOL ABSOLUTE CLOWN. I love when kids try and come back at me with a smart tone like they have a CLUE what they're talking about LMAO. Absolute joke.


What they get for Schmidt ? .. a 3rd rounder… so much for that 1st … hmm who’s the ABSOLUTE CLOWN ??
Looks like a cap dump to me .

Before the Schmidt trade Canucks have 9 forwards , 4 dman and 1 goalie signed for next year.
Before the trade Canucks had $23,639,351 including Ferland on LTIR
IF Pettersson and Hughes each take $9m and Dickinson takes $3,500,000 as you put it .. that’s 21,500,000.
Leaves the Canucks with $2,139,351 and have to still sign 3 dman, 2-3 forward and backup goalie …

So yeah, I’d say Schmidt is a cap dump …
Jul. 27, 2021 at 7:56 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 39
Likes: 8
Quoting: hawksfan1988
What they get for Schmidt ? .. a 3rd rounder… so much for that 1st … hmm who’s the ABSOLUTE CLOWN ??
Looks like a cap dump to me .

Before the Schmidt trade Canucks have 9 forwards , 4 dman and 1 goalie signed for next year.
Before the trade Canucks had $23,639,351 including Ferland on LTIR
IF Pettersson and Hughes each take $9m and Dickinson takes $3,500,000 as you put it .. that’s 21,500,000.
Leaves the Canucks with $2,139,351 and have to still sign 3 dman, 2-3 forward and backup goalie …

So yeah, I’d say Schmidt is a cap dump …


Damn, took you long enough to respond. Had to try and think of something to say, eh?

Who cares what they got for Schmidt? We got back what we paid for him so essentially we got a free year of Schmidt, how is that bad? LOL. Well, I guess for a clown like you who can't think ahead it might seem bad.

I don't know why you're talking about before Schmidt as he's gone now and thus such discussion is worthless. I'm also not sure where you're getting 2.1 mil from, this seems like pretty basic math. I'll work it out for you though. We had 20 mil before the Schmidt trade. Now after trading Schmidt we can add 6 mil to that. Now we have 26 mil. Are you following along? Now, after adding Ferland to LTIR we get to add another 3.5 to that 26 which gives us around 29.5 mil to work with. Make sense?

If we sign Petey and Hughes for 9 mil each, and Dickinson for 3.5 (which we won't because they aren't worth that yet, at all. They have more to prove) As we went over earlier, that would equal 21.5 mil.

29.5 mil - 21.5 mil = 8. You get it? C'mon now, this is basic math.

* Quick side note. I'm also still not sure where you're getting that we have to sign 3 defencemen? We have Hughes, OEL, Myers and Rathbone which equals 4, and last time I checked, only 6 D can be on the roster at one time... LOL absolute clown. If you're going to talk about a team, at least look at their roster beforehand so you can have a clue what you're talking about.

Also not sure where you're getting 2-3 forwards from. Our current lines are:

Miller-Petey-Boes
Hog-Horvat-Garland
Pearson-Dicky-Podz
Motte-TBD-Mac/Highmore

Only one hole to fill there bud. Again. If you're going to talk about a team, at least look at their roster beforehand so you can have a clue what you're talking about.

Anyways, to continue. After overpaying Petey, Hughes and Dicky, we still have 8 mil to sign ONE 4th line center. TWO low-end RHD, not three lmao. And ONE backup goalie.

We're more than fine, thanks.

Absolute. Clown. You are genuinely one of the slowest people I've talked to in a long time. Stay the hell out of my notifications with your goofy a**, I'm done wasting my time on you.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 7:58 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 233
Quoting: Phyzsics
Damn, took you long enough to respond. Had to try and think of something to say, eh?

Who cares what they got for Schmidt? We got back what we paid for him so essentially we got a free year of Schmidt, how is that bad? LOL. Well, I guess for a clown like you who can't think ahead it might seem bad.

I don't know why you're talking about before Schmidt as he's gone now and thus such discussion is worthless. I'm also not sure where you're getting 2.1 mil from, this seems like pretty basic math. I'll work it out for you though. We had 20 mil before the Schmidt trade. Now after trading Schmidt we can add 6 mil to that. Now we have 26 mil. Are you following along? Now, after adding Ferland to LTIR we get to add another 3.5 to that 26 which gives us around 29.5 mil to work with. Make sense?

If we sign Petey and Hughes for 9 mil each, and Dickinson for 3.5 (which we won't because they aren't worth that yet, at all. They have more to prove) As we went over earlier, that would equal 21.5 mil.

29.5 mil - 21.5 mil = 8. You get it? C'mon now, this is basic math.

* Quick side note. I'm also still not sure where you're getting that we have to sign 3 defencemen? We have Hughes, OEL, Myers and Rathbone which equals 4, and last time I checked, only 6 D can be on the roster at one time... LOL absolute clown. If you're going to talk about a team, at least look at their roster beforehand so you can have a clue what you're talking about.

Anyways, to continue. After overpaying Petey, Hughes and Dicky, we still have 8 mil to sign ONE 4th line center. TWO low-end RHD, not three lmao. And ONE backup goalie.

We're more than fine, thanks.

Absolute. Clown. You are genuinely one of the slowest people I've talked to in a long time. Stay the hell out of my notifications with your goofy a**, I'm done wasting my time on you.



You’re a f***en idiot bud .. go back to your moms basement and jerk off to your old Bure posters you loser fan boy.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 8:02 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 39
Likes: 8
Quoting: hawksfan1988
You’re a f***en idiot bud .. go back to your moms basement and jerk off to your old Bure posters you loser fan boy.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I know I said I wouldn't respond, but I just couldn't help myself. Nice response man! So thorough and well thought out! I can tell you're salty, f*cking loser lmao. Okay, now I'm done. Thanks for the laugh you walking dunce cap.
Jul. 27, 2021 at 8:05 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 233
Quoting: Phyzsics
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I know I said I wouldn't respond, but I just couldn't help myself. Nice response man! So thorough and well thought out! I can tell you're salty, f*cking loser lmao. Okay, now I'm done. Thanks for the laugh you walking dunce cap.


Enjoy being the biggest loser troll on here.
There’s a big reason Canuck fans are known as the absolute worst fans in sports … you’re the perfect example.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll