SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What the sabres should have done

Created by: ErikJohannsen
Team: 2016-17 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 3, 2017
Published: Mar. 3, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. 2017 4th round pick (FLA)
2.
BUF
  1. De La Rose, Jacob
  2. 2017 5th round pick (MTL)
3.
BUF
  1. 2017 3rd round pick (DET)
4.
BUF
  1. 2017 4th round pick (ANA)
  2. 2018 6th round pick (ANA)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2018
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BUF
2019
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$73,000,000$51,641,191$0$5,815,000$21,358,809
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 7
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
UFA - 2
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
$670,000$670,000 (Performance Bonus$232,500$232K)
RW
UFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 6
$2,225,000$2,225,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$5,142,857$5,142,857
RD
UFA - 4
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$600,000$600,000
RD
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 3, 2017 at 8:14 p.m.
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,420
Likes: 9,112
Edited Mar. 3, 2017 at 8:26 p.m.
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW
Mar. 4, 2017 at 2:17 p.m.
#2
GMTM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious
Mar. 7, 2017 at 4:06 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 478
Likes: 39
Jeez we got some real critcs in the comments eh? I really don't think my propositions are that ridiculous that my GMing warrants a one star...I'd like to see one of you do better.

Quoting: GMTM
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious


Quoting: Shibbal18
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW
Mar. 7, 2017 at 4:49 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,638
Likes: 6,769
Quoting: ErikJohannsen
Jeez we got some real critcs in the comments eh? I really don't think my propositions are that ridiculous that my GMing warrants a one star...I'd like to see one of you do better.

Quoting: GMTM
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious


Quoting: Shibbal18
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW


Judging by the reactions, I'm guessing there was a trade of Kane for a 2nd a 5th. The others are right, that is selling Kane short even if he may or may not have off ice issues etc. If you had to associate a value to Buffalo with Kane and a value to Buffalo minus Kane but with the two picks, I'd say your better off with Kane.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll