So Gallant didn't have any say?

He also failed

Apparently, Drury had the 23, and Turk had the letters

*idiot gm voice* but very few teams have TWO big heavy 4th line RWs and we have TWO of them so we're two ahead of them, right 😏

Kravs won’t be on the 4th, he lost his job to Gaut who just outplayed him. Kravs will make almost any other team. Almost wish we didn’t have Gaut so that Kravs would play.

Gaut could play on the 4th line, he was great but Kravtsov never did anything to lose his spot, neither Hunt or Reaves have to be regulars, Gauthier Rooney Blais could be a legit 4th line

Oh I agree, but Kravs doesn’t want to go down to the A for a day or a week and here we are.. Lias Anderson all over again

Lias was never given a chance, went to LA and he looks great now, care to guess what would happen if Kravtsov was traded to a team that actually wants him? If it was a day or 2 Drury would tell him that, and Gallant already told the media he thinks he has his best 23, the checks being half as big for that long just isn't worth it IMO

Dont need to guess. He’s ready for top 6 but we have too much and he doesn’t fit the bottom 6 as well as others do. He had to know that he was only down till Thursday or till Hajek is moved. I guess we just suspend him and play the trade bait game for a week or 2 and then he is back on the roster after hajek is moved?

If Drury hasn't found a deal yet he should have waived him last week, its not rocket science, also Turk said Goodrow Chytil Kravtsov was great for most of camp, so he clearly had a spot

I’m not fighting with you, he should be 3C for most games. Obviously they want Gaut for his size against WSH.. Hajek isn’t important at this point and should have been waived, I agree, I don’t understand why they haven’t.

Drury is too proud, common theme with the rangers organization, even long before Drury