SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines i would use with the new trade

Created by: LGuy54
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 19, 2022
Published: Feb. 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,369,783$0$0$130,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 19, 2022 at 11:54 p.m.
#1
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
swap ilya with ryan, reason being that ryan is also a good defensive player, and needs more ice time for dubas and keef to see what they got there
LGuy54 liked this.
Feb. 19, 2022 at 11:57 p.m.
#2
Me
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 863
Likes: 254
Wouldn’t take out Engvall, he drives that fourth line
MatthewsFan liked this.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 12:00 a.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 12:01 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,892
Likes: 3,372
I'd keep Engvall in the lineup. Maybe have Dzingel and Simmonds on a rotation depending on matchups. They'll likely both be playing when Kase inevitably gets injured.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 12:09 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
TOR V5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,381
Likes: 1,906
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


I heard Klingberg is bad defensively so idk
Feb. 20, 2022 at 12:10 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


Klingberg is the wrong type of defenceman for Toronto; he doesn't add enough value to Toronto to justify that much of our future.
TrueCanuck liked this.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 12:11 a.m.
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Quoting: LGuy54
I heard Klingberg is bad defensively so idk


Not bad, per se, but it's not his strong suit. He's a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly, really.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 4:52 a.m.
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


Quoting: justaBoss
Not bad, per se, but it's not his strong suit. He's a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly, really.


How bout not.

Klingberg is a glorified version of Tyson Barrie - actually calling him a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly is a huge insult to Rielly, Klingberg’s worse. Klingberg would fit in Toronto the same way Barrie did, which he didn’t. He would need 1st unit PP time and sheltered minutes at 5v5 to be successful and that’s not happening in Toronto and not happening for the price of Liljegren and a 1st round pick plus more. Rielly has the 1st unit PP locked down and Sandin has the 2nd locked down, and with Muzzin struggling defensively this season there’s no one to shelter Klingberg with so he just doesn’t fit in.

Toronto’s likely not interested in him and definitely not at the price of Liljegren, 1st, +
Leafs_and_Sens_Fan liked this.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 5:20 a.m.
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Quoting: TrueCanuck
How bout not.

Klingberg is a glorified version of Tyson Barrie - actually calling him a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly is a huge insult to Rielly, Klingberg’s worse. Klingberg would fit in Toronto the same way Barrie did, which he didn’t. He would need 1st unit PP time and sheltered minutes at 5v5 to be successful and that’s not happening in Toronto and not happening for the price of Liljegren and a 1st round pick plus more. Rielly has the 1st unit PP locked down and Sandin has the 2nd locked down, and with Muzzin struggling defensively this season there’s no one to shelter Klingberg with so he just doesn’t fit in.

Toronto’s likely not interested in him and definitely not at the price of Liljegren, 1st, +


That Tyson Barrie argument isn't exactly valid, because Barrie has consistently benefitted throughout his career by the fact that he's had the chance to play with the absolute elite talent (MacKinnon in COL, Matthews and Marner in TOR and McDavid and Draisaitl in EDM) in the league, which had shown in his numbers massively. Klingberg hasn't had this kind of luxury.

Klingberg has played his whole career in Dallas and have seen many different playstyles, starting from Ruff's and Hitchcock's all out offense, and then Montgomery's and Bowness' very defensive systems. Naturally as an offensive talent a team with more offensive mindset benefits the guy, which also explains the drop off in his numbers from what they were in 2015-18 compared to 2019-22.

Even still since Jan 1st 2019 Klingberg is 16th in all D scoring, 8 points behind Morgan Rielly in a consistently worse team offensively, as since that date Leafs have scored 737 goals compared to 574 goals scored by Dallas. I think these are impressive scored for an offensive D-man in a defense oriented team.

Now I'm not going to say that Klingberg is better than Rielly by any means, but as for saying that Klingberg is more offensive version of Rielly...well I don't think I'm that far off in saying this too. Calling him a glorified version of Barrie is in my opinion more insulting to Klingberg than calling Klingberg more offensive version of Rielly is to Rielly himself, respectively. Barrie is basically Mike Hoffman, just playing the D position. He'd likely be better as a forward. He has more points than both Rielly and Klingberg does from this timeframe but he has basically no defense. Even Klingberg has more.

As for fit...you might have a point there. As for interest...I'll leave that with a quote from Frank Seravalli

Quoting: Seravalli
The Leafs need a right-shooting defenseman to partner with Jake Muzzin and shore up Toronto’s second pair. That unit has been the Leafs’ most uneven this season, including the forward lines. Dubas’ preference appears to be players with term, but that likely will not exclude Toronto from dipping its toe in the water on a bigger pending free agent target, like John Klingberg. But even players with term could be difficult because the Leafs have an eye towards this summer’s business. They have approximately $8 million in space, but will need to pay Jack Campbell and fill third line left wing and fourth line center roles
Feb. 20, 2022 at 10:11 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
That Tyson Barrie argument isn't exactly valid, because Barrie has consistently benefitted throughout his career by the fact that he's had the chance to play with the absolute elite talent (MacKinnon in COL, Matthews and Marner in TOR and McDavid and Draisaitl in EDM) in the league, which had shown in his numbers massively. Klingberg hasn't had this kind of luxury.

Klingberg has played his whole career in Dallas and have seen many different playstyles, starting from Ruff's and Hitchcock's all out offense, and then Montgomery's and Bowness' very defensive systems. Naturally as an offensive talent a team with more offensive mindset benefits the guy, which also explains the drop off in his numbers from what they were in 2015-18 compared to 2019-22.

Even still since Jan 1st 2019 Klingberg is 16th in all D scoring, 8 points behind Morgan Rielly in a consistently worse team offensively, as since that date Leafs have scored 737 goals compared to 574 goals scored by Dallas. I think these are impressive scored for an offensive D-man in a defense oriented team.

Now I'm not going to say that Klingberg is better than Rielly by any means, but as for saying that Klingberg is more offensive version of Rielly...well I don't think I'm that far off in saying this too. Calling him a glorified version of Barrie is in my opinion more insulting to Klingberg than calling Klingberg more offensive version of Rielly is to Rielly himself, respectively. Barrie is basically Mike Hoffman, just playing the D position. He'd likely be better as a forward. He has more points than both Rielly and Klingberg does from this timeframe but he has basically no defense. Even Klingberg has more.

As for fit...you might have a point there. As for interest...I'll leave that with a quote from Frank Seravalli


Klingberg would be a great addition to any team but he's simply not worth that many assets to Toronto as he's not the type of defenceman the Leafs need. Now if you were giving him for a 2nd round pick I'm sure the Leafs would jump on that deal but he just doesn't add enough value to justify Holl+Liljegren+1st.

Add to that his contract demands are kinda ridiculous and the Stars are more desperate to move him than any team is to acquire him imo which drops his trade value.
Feb. 20, 2022 at 10:22 p.m.
#11
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Klingberg would be a great addition to any team but he's simply not worth that many assets to Toronto as he's not the type of defenceman the Leafs need. Now if you were giving him for a 2nd round pick I'm sure the Leafs would jump on that deal but he just doesn't add enough value to justify Holl+Liljegren+1st.

Add to that his contract demands are kinda ridiculous and the Stars are more desperate to move him than any team is to acquire him imo which drops his trade value.


Actually Dallas is not desperate to move him at all. Gaglardi, our owner, wants this team to make it to the playoffs so right now it's likely that they won't be selling anyone this year, but rather they're going to be buyers. Me as a Dallas fan don't think this is a good idea at all as we're far too inconsistent to challenge the likes of Avs in the first round, so I personally am in favor of moving assets like Klingberg for futures as it helps us to be better in the future as this year we're simply not good enough.

Klingberg for a second round pick would be such a joke though. He's still easily a top4 D-man in every team in the league and top pair in most of them. I'd still want a prospect (preferably RHD as we're lacking those) plus first for the guy. Holl was added here simply for cap reasons.
Feb. 21, 2022 at 1:58 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
Actually Dallas is not desperate to move him at all. Gaglardi, our owner, wants this team to make it to the playoffs so right now it's likely that they won't be selling anyone this year, but rather they're going to be buyers. Me as a Dallas fan don't think this is a good idea at all as we're far too inconsistent to challenge the likes of Avs in the first round, so I personally am in favor of moving assets like Klingberg for futures as it helps us to be better in the future as this year we're simply not good enough.

Klingberg for a second round pick would be such a joke though. He's still easily a top4 D-man in every team in the league and top pair in most of them. I'd still want a prospect (preferably RHD as we're lacking those) plus first for the guy. Holl was added here simply for cap reasons.


Yeah, I wasn't trying to say he's worth a 2nd round pick that was just an example to explain that Toronto could definitely be interested for the right price but I definitely don't think that price is what you're looking for.

I'm also opposed to self rentals I've seen it happen too many times and not work out. I don't think the Stars will be cup contenders, the Avs are probably the team out of the West to beat and I don't see that happening in a 7 game series.

Klingberg's ask is frankly way too much (8Mx8) for what he brings to a team.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll