SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next year with Forsberg

Created by: SnipeRV
Team: 2022-23 Nashville Predators
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2022
Published: Feb. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Still think we resign Forsberg, not sure why we wouldn't. We have too much LD depth so I got rid of Davies because Farrance has more upside. We need a 2nd line winger. We either go get one in FA or ideally go after an RFA like Debrusk that we could get for relatively cheap. I think Debrusk fits in well. We give him a year deal to show what he's got and then if it doesn't work out we move on.

The biggest question mark on the roster is Kunin. I really like him but he just hasn't flourished here. Do we deal him? Or resign him short term?
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$1,500,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$4,400,000
1$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,500,000
Trades
NSH
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
I'll admit, I have no idea what his value is to y'all but it sounds like you dont want to pay up to resign him
BOS
  1. Davies, Jeremy
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
2024
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$72,635,309$0$345,000$8,864,691
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,857,143$2,857,143
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$750,000$750,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$9,059,000$9,059,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$733,333$733,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$733,333$733,333
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,550,000$2,550,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 28, 2022 at 2:41 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 5,334
For me, Tolvanen is a bigger concern than Kunin. Kunin has been better of late, and fits in better in the bottom six than Tolvanen does, if/when Poile upgrades Johansen's line.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 2:51 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Debrusk is playing awesome right now. The notion of lowballing for him doesn’t work, because the bruins would be better off just not qualifying him in the off-season.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 3:28 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 417
Likes: 128
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Debrusk is playing awesome right now. The notion of lowballing for him doesn’t work, because the bruins would be better off just not qualifying him in the off-season.


That doesn't really make sense. If they aren't going to qualify him and they know he wants out, then why wouldn't they take picks/prospects for him when they would otherwise lose him for nothing?
Feb. 28, 2022 at 3:29 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 417
Likes: 128
Quoting: gmgb
For me, Tolvanen is a bigger concern than Kunin. Kunin has been better of late, and fits in better in the bottom six than Tolvanen does, if/when Poile upgrades Johansen's line.


Yea I meant $$$-wise. He will want a bigger contract than his last ($2.3Mx2) but hasn't really earned it. Tolvy doesn't bother me much because we are paying him $1.5Mx3 so even if he just ends up on the 4th line he isn't a big liability.
gmgb and Dadof5boys liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 5,334
Quoting: SnipeRV
Yea I meant $$$-wise. He will want a bigger contract than his last ($2.3Mx2) but hasn't really earned it. Tolvy doesn't bother me much because we are paying him $1.5Mx3 so even if he just ends up on the 4th line he isn't a big liability.


I could see Kunin signing a one year prove it deal this summer.
Dadof5boys liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: SnipeRV
That doesn't really make sense. If they aren't going to qualify him and they know he wants out, then why wouldn't they take picks/prospects for him when they would otherwise lose him for nothing?


Um. Seriously?

The answer is to try to win. He’s played very well for the last two months. Good enough to earn a try out on the top line. He’s delivered with two goals, and an assist in two games. Do you think the bruins are in the midst of a rebuild or something?

If a debrusk trade isn’t part of a package to make the current bruins roster better, you can just go ahead and assume its a bad idea.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 4:36 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 417
Likes: 128
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Um. Seriously?

The answer is to try to win. He’s played very well for the last two months. Good enough to earn a try out on the top line. He’s delivered with two goals, and an assist in two games. Do you think the bruins are in the midst of a rebuild or something?

If a debrusk trade isn’t part of a package to make the current bruins roster better, you can just go ahead and assume its a bad idea.


I think you missed the fact that this is a 22-23 roster. It assumes you trade the rights at the end of the season...
Feb. 28, 2022 at 4:39 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: SnipeRV
I think you missed the fact that this is a 22-23 roster. It assumes you trade the rights at the end of the season...


I kind of assumed it was a deadline deal, because otherwise it doesn’t make sense.

He either gets qualified, and likely stays, or he doesn’t and they just part ways.

Nashville calls up and asks about debrusk and they get one of two answers:
1. We’re qualifying him and keeping him
2. Ya, we’ll trade him — which means, “we’re not qualifying him.”

No matter what the answer is, the response from nashville is not trading for him.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll