Avatar

gmgb

Member Since
Jun. 22, 2017
Favourite Team
Nashville Predators
Forum Posts
3876
Posts per Day
2.3
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsYesterday at 5:07 p.m.
Can't see any reason for NSH to consider this one. If they had any interest in Marner, a deal would have to take place before the deadline - not in the off-season.
You'd have to think they'd want Marner in their top six while they still have Forsber.
Marner's salary doesn't really let them re-sign Forsberg to a raise in the summer. Still, does adding Marner while losing their #1 center and a 1st pairing defenseman make them a stronger team? Probably not.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dutchies</b></div><div>I don't think this is too far off.

As a Leafs fan, I'd like to see Mrazek in and Hutch out (Hutch is really a nothing). Take out Evangelista and Ingram and add in Tomisino.
Leafs have coveted Granlund for a long time.
I think the sticking point with NSH would be Fabbro. They'd probably rather part with Carrier which I would be ok with.
NSH could even keep the second (though I'll never turn down extra draft picks) LOL</div></div>

I'm afraid your tweaks make it a lot worse for NSH.
Carrier is better and cheaper than Forsberg, so that's not something they'd rather do.
Yeah Hutchinson has no value, but I assume he's just in the proposal so NSH has an AHL goalie to finish out the season with, if they're losing Ingram. Mrazek is a cap dump they're not going to want to take on. Cap space becomes even more of an issue with Fabbro's higher hit instead of Carrier's low salary, Mrazek making way too much to be a bad backup, and losing a cheap roster player on an ELC (Tomasino).
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 3:46 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:07 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:04 p.m.
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMon. at 1:39 p.m.