SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

buffalo next year

Created by: AlexTheKid09
Team: 2022-23 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 3, 2022
Published: Mar. 3, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$915,000
4$5,500,000
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
3$4,750,000
3$4,500,000
3$3,250,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 7th round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (PHI)
2.
BUF
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (TBL)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$64,417,500$0$1,262,500$17,082,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 2
$3,250,000$3,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$915,000$915,000
G
RFA - 2
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$853,333$853,333
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:08 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Hard no from boston.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:16 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,893
Likes: 6,114
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hard no from boston.


How much more do you think Boston will get for debrusk???
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:17 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: wojme
How much more do you think Boston will get for debrusk???


It’s not necessarily more, its the fit. The bruins are looking to improve their team, and a 2nd round pick doesn’t do that.
wojme liked this.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:18 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,893
Likes: 6,114
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
It’s not necessarily more, its the fit. The bruins are looking to improve their team, and a 2nd round pick doesn’t do that.


Fair
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:26 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
It’s not necessarily more, its the fit. The bruins are looking to improve their team, and a 2nd round pick doesn’t do that.


What do u think you’re gonna get for him?
Best bet might be to take a pick & then turn that into a player from another team
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:41 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
What do u think you’re gonna get for him?
Best bet might be to take a pick & then turn that into a player from another team


Or just keep him for this season. He’s been playing really well in 2022.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:51 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Or just keep him for this season. He’s been playing really well in 2022.


Sure, but doesn’t he want out?
Or has that changed?
Mar. 3, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
Sure, but doesn’t he want out?
Or has that changed?


He wants out, but so what?
Mar. 3, 2022 at 4:56 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He wants out, but so what?


It’s unusual to keep a guy around who wants out
Why not move him & bring in someone who wants to actually be there?
Doesn’t that make more sense
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:01 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
It’s unusual to keep a guy around who wants out
Why not move him & bring in someone who wants to actually be there?
Doesn’t that make more sense


Sure! This trade was for a second round pick. If theres someone that can help the team as much or more than debrusk, by all means, propose that trade.

He’s said he’ll happily show up and play and not be a distraction, but he would like to be moved to a different team. No pressure on the bruins to do so.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Sure! This trade was for a second round pick. If theres someone that can help the team as much or more than debrusk, by all means, propose that trade.

He’s said he’ll happily show up and play and not be a distraction, but he would like to be moved to a different team. No pressure on the bruins to do so.


Like i said, turn that 2nd into a player
I’m sure there’s guys out there who are available that you’d rather have
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:09 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
Like i said, turn that 2nd into a player
I’m sure there’s guys out there who are available that you’d rather have


They aren’t going to find someone for a 2nd round pick that improves the team. No shot.

This just isn’t the fit.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:13 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
They aren’t going to find someone for a 2nd round pick that improves the team. No shot.

This just isn’t the fit.


Maybe, maybe not?
There’s gotta be good players available at the deadline u guys could get
They won’t all cost a 1st
Most don’t
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:31 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
Maybe, maybe not?
There’s gotta be good players available at the deadline u guys could get
They won’t all cost a 1st
Most don’t


Most won’t. All that will have a bigger impact than debrusk will.

Sorry, this is just a slam-dunk no.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:38 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Most won’t. All that will have a bigger impact than debrusk will.

Sorry, this is just a slam-dunk no.


That fine, i don’t want him
Your thought process just doesn’t make much sense
Especially if u guys aren’t gonna qualify him & lose him for nothing
Mar. 3, 2022 at 5:56 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
That fine, i don’t want him
Your thought process just doesn’t make much sense
Especially if u guys aren’t gonna qualify him & lose him for nothing


Ya, so what? Teams that are trying to win sometimes make trades for rentals. How would this be different? Ditch debrusk for a 2nd, create a hole, or don’t get the second, and keep the player. Easy.
Or qualify him and trade him, as his agent publicly said that he would sign an extension below his QO. Or trade him as part of a package to upgrade the team.

The thought process is very easy to understand, and makes all the sense in the world.

The bruins goal right now is to make their hockey club better. This makes their hockey club worse. Fin.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 7:16 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Ya, so what? Teams that are trying to win sometimes make trades for rentals. How would this be different? Ditch debrusk for a 2nd, create a hole, or don’t get the second, and keep the player. Easy.
Or qualify him and trade him, as his agent publicly said that he would sign an extension below his QO. Or trade him as part of a package to upgrade the team.

The thought process is very easy to understand, and makes all the sense in the world.

The bruins goal right now is to make their hockey club better. This makes their hockey club worse. Fin.


Your short term vision is what doesn’t make sense
And u act like DeBrusk is some stud player
If you’re gonna lose him, then trade him for a pick
And use that pick to get another player
That’s obviously better than losing him for nothing
It’s not rocket science
Mar. 3, 2022 at 7:23 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
Your short term vision is what doesn’t make sense
And u act like DeBrusk is some stud player
If you’re gonna lose him, then trade him for a pick
And use that pick to get another player
That’s obviously better than losing him for nothing
It’s not rocket science


Sigh. Alright, lets go through this slowly.
Part one:
Debrusk has been a productive player for the bruins of late - after a very slow start, he’s been playing a lot better. 7 goals and 9 points in the last 10 games, earning him a promotion to the top line.

Part two:
The bruins sole mission in trade right now is to improve the current roster that will be playing in the playoffs this year.

Part three:
A draft pick doesn’t play for the bruins this year

Part four: It is unlikely, bordering on impossible, that the Bruins would be able to move a second round pick (the return of this trade), for a roster player that provides a stronger impact to the roster than Debrusk.

That’s clear, right? Same page now? Good.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 10:24 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Sigh. Alright, lets go through this slowly.
Part one:
Debrusk has been a productive player for the bruins of late - after a very slow start, he’s been playing a lot better. 7 goals and 9 points in the last 10 games, earning him a promotion to the top line.

Part two:
The bruins sole mission in trade right now is to improve the current roster that will be playing in the playoffs this year.

Part three:
A draft pick doesn’t play for the bruins this year

Part four: It is unlikely, bordering on impossible, that the Bruins would be able to move a second round pick (the return of this trade), for a roster player that provides a stronger impact to the roster than Debrusk.

That’s clear, right? Same page now? Good.


I get what you’re saying
It’s just utterly nonsensical
Bc your GM is NOT going to focus SOLELY on this season as you’re (at the least) implying
So I’d keeping DeBrusk isn’t in their plan moving forward,
then it fully makes sense to turn him into an asset or assets that will

And acting like u can’t replace DeBrusk this season is also bananas
You DON’T KNOW what a 2nd round pick can or can’t get at the deadline- not unless u have some sort of crystal ball
I’m sure a winger will be available to replace him
Maybe it’ll be an improvement, maybe it won’t

But the bottom line is that it’s bad asset management to let DeBrusk leave for nothing
And even if all u got was a pick & didn’t replace him this season,
big deal
U guys aren’t Cup contenders this season with him anyways
It’s unlikely u even get past the 1st round
Mar. 3, 2022 at 10:34 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
I get what you’re saying
It’s just utterly nonsensical
Bc your GM is NOT going to focus SOLELY on this season as you’re (at the least) implying
So I’d keeping DeBrusk isn’t in their plan moving forward,
then it fully makes sense to turn him into an asset or assets that will

And acting like u can’t replace DeBrusk this season is also bananas
You DON’T KNOW what a 2nd round pick can or can’t get at the deadline- not unless u have some sort of crystal ball
I’m sure a winger will be available to replace him
Maybe it’ll be an improvement, maybe it won’t

But the bottom line is that it’s bad asset management to let DeBrusk leave for nothing
And even if all u got was a pick & didn’t replace him this season,
big deal
U guys aren’t Cup contenders this season with him anyways
It’s unlikely u even get past the 1st round


If Sweeney is focusing more on the future than the present, with bergeron and marchand at their respective ages, he’s even dumber than i thought.
Mar. 3, 2022 at 10:41 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If Sweeney is focusing more on the future than the present, with bergeron and marchand at their respective ages, he’s even dumber than i thought.


It’s not an either/or thing dude,
it’s BOTH
Mar. 3, 2022 at 10:45 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If Sweeney is focusing more on the future than the present, with bergeron and marchand at their respective ages, he’s even dumber than i thought.

AND
It’s about a smart GM realizing that this realistically isn’t your year
BUT
that doesn’t mean DeBrusk can’t help u get something that can improve your chances for next year & the year after, etc

Asset management matters
U guys don’t wanna turn into the Blackhawks for example
Mar. 4, 2022 at 7:04 a.m.
#23
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
AND
It’s about a smart GM realizing that this realistically isn’t your year
BUT
that doesn’t mean DeBrusk can’t help u get something that can improve your chances for next year & the year after, etc

Asset management matters
U guys don’t wanna turn into the Blackhawks for example


You need to go look up how old Patrice Bergeron is pal.
Mar. 4, 2022 at 7:05 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Buffalove
It’s not an either/or thing dude,
it’s BOTH


No, with the age of certain pieces of the roster its one or the other. Binary.
Mar. 4, 2022 at 1:14 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
No, with the age of certain pieces of the roster its one or the other. Binary.


There is ZERO chance the Ruins win the Cup this year
You’ll be lucky to get past the 2nd round
Heck, u probably won’t win the 1st round

Making personnel moves out of a desperate attempt to win this season is just gonna leave u disappointed
Enjoy becoming the Blackhawks if your GM employs your (NOT) brilliant logic
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll