SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

more of a boring offseason

Created by: MNHockey19
Team: 2022-23 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2022
Published: May 31, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,200,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
1$750,000
Trades
MIN
  1. Boucher, Tyler
  2. 2023 1st round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Fiala, Kevin [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$81,193,588$0$1,532,500$1,306,412
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$894,167$894,167
RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 31, 2022 at 1:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
If that’s the return, sign his arb offer and trade him at the deadline.
May 31, 2022 at 1:25 p.m.
#2
Hii
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 570
That 2023 pick has to be at least top 10 or top 5 protected.
May 31, 2022 at 1:54 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 479
If that 2023 pick is unprotected then this is a deal MN has to make. Not sure Boucher does anything though, rather sub for a C or RHD prospect. Or no prospect and keep the 2nd rounder maybe throw in a 4/5th.
May 31, 2022 at 3:17 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: IcemanJoe
If that 2023 pick is unprotected then this is a deal MN has to make. Not sure Boucher does anything though, rather sub for a C or RHD prospect. Or no prospect and keep the 2nd rounder maybe throw in a 4/5th.


If the pick is a 23, there’s no way I’d accept it unprotected and there is no reason to send a 2nd back, maybe a 4th/5th if you need an equalizer. And even then, you need a JBD or Greig type prospect instead of Boucher.

Do not forget that Fiala is a top 5 scoring target that has years of youth on all of Miller/Forsberg/Gaudreau and will have the lowest cap hit of that group. There will be suitors.
MNBassman and Wildwinswhen liked this.
May 31, 2022 at 4:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 479
Quoting: jnowariak
If the pick is a 23, there’s no way I’d accept it unprotected and there is no reason to send a 2nd back, maybe a 4th/5th if you need an equalizer. And even then, you need a JBD or Greig type prospect instead of Boucher.

Do not forget that Fiala is a top 5 scoring target that has years of youth on all of Miller/Forsberg/Gaudreau and will have the lowest cap hit of that group. There will be suitors.


You’d want the pick protected? An unprotected 2023 first round pick is extremely valuable. More valuable than 7OA in 2022 IMO. That 2023 class looks loaded with top talent.
May 31, 2022 at 4:17 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: IcemanJoe
You’d want the pick protected? An unprotected 2023 first round pick is extremely valuable. More valuable than 7OA in 2022 IMO. That 2023 class looks loaded with top talent.


Make it top 2 protected. The point of trading for Fiala is to win now. That 23 pick doesn’t hit the NHL for 2 years. At which point Dorian is gone for botching the rebuild rather than trading the 23 1st. While Michkov and Bedard are generational, no team trading for Fiala is expecting to be in the hunt for them. You have to make the trade assuming that pick is a mid teens lowest, otherwise what’s the point.

We also do this with every upcoming draft year, so I’m not that concerned if the pick is 22 or 23.
May 31, 2022 at 4:21 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 479
Quoting: jnowariak
Make it top 2 protected. The point of trading for Fiala is to win now. That 23 pick doesn’t hit the NHL for 2 years. At which point Dorian is gone for botching the rebuild rather than trading the 23 1st. While Michkov and Bedard are generational, no team trading for Fiala is expecting to be in the hunt for them. You have to make the trade assuming that pick is a mid teens lowest, otherwise what’s the point.

We also do this with every upcoming draft year, so I’m not that concerned if the pick is 22 or 23.


If the point is to win now then should be fine without protection then. No rule saying you assume it’s a pick in the teens. They haven’t made the playoffs in 5 years.
MNHockey19 and MNBassman liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll