SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Filling some holes

Created by: FilthyMitts0505
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2022
Published: Jun. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Conor Garland would be a great addition to the devils top six group. I think they would be a team to downgrade from their pick as they have selected top 10 in four of the last five drafts.

Dickinson hasn't panned out to what we were hoping for so i think a buyout could be an option so we aren't paying assets to get rid of him.

Justin Shultz is a relativly cheap short term option for the RHD slot. He can add to the bluelines scoring which has lacked in the last few years and adds some veteran leadership to the squad.

Drafting Nimec would fill our future need for a top 4 RHD and if Filip Johanssen can get back to his regime from when he was drafted thats another really good option.

Curtis Lazar is a good option to replace the hole created in the bottom six by the absence of Tyler Motte.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,545,000
2$950,000
2$850,000
1$850,000
3$850,000
3$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,250,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$1,500,000
4$5,500,000
3$3,500,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2022 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Klimovich, Danila
  3. 2022 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Canucks can trade up and get the 2nd overall pick in order to draft one of the solid and highly touted RHD. Simon Nimec seems like the best option and is ranked top 5 on Peter Baracchinis draft rankings.
2.
VAN
  1. Benson, Tyler [RFA Rights]
3.
VAN
  1. 2023 7th round pick (VAN)
ARI
  1. Pearson, Tanner
Additional Details:
We get our origonial ( i cant spell ) pick back and gain some long-term cap flexibility.
4.
VAN
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
There has been lot's of speculation of Debrusk to Vancouver over the years. I think this is a time where it could make a lot of sense. Jack Studnicka is right shot forward who could fill in for the hole left by dickinson on the third or fourth line. He is also a young player with lots of potential.
BOS
  1. Horvat, Bo
Additional Details:
I say we decide to keep J.T Miller on the team long-term. He will likely get a Zibanejed contract comparison so around 8 mil long-term. This leaves very little room for when Horvats contract expires. He will get somewhere between 6.5-7.5 AAV on his next contract which will be very difficult to manage. He fills the 2nd line center position on Boston very well.
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$77,650,834$1,250,000$1,150,000$4,849,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,545,000$6,545,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 18, 2022 at 1:12 a.m.
#26
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: mv21227
Horvat is definitely worth more than a 2nd and middle 6 winger. At recent deadlines, Nick Foligno, Kyle Palmieri, and Barclay Goodrow returned 1st round picks. JG Pageau returned a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round pick. Blake Coleman returned a 1st and recently drafted 1st round prospect


Debrusk and horvat are both top six guys that probably shouldn’t be on any first line. Horvat is better. Debrusk is younger, cheaper, with more term. I don’t think trade is enough, but the addition of a first is too much. Listing all those guys that got whatever in draft capital isn’t really applicable here. The trade is a totally different structure.
Jun. 18, 2022 at 2:26 a.m.
#27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Debrusk and horvat are both top six guys that probably shouldn’t be on any first line. Horvat is better. Debrusk is younger, cheaper, with more term. I don’t think trade is enough, but the addition of a first is too much. Listing all those guys that got whatever in draft capital isn’t really applicable here. The trade is a totally different structure.


How are those trade comps not applicable? tears of joy Trade "structure" is not directly proportional to trade VALUATION
Jun. 18, 2022 at 8:47 a.m.
#28
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Knuckl3s
How are those trade comps not applicable? tears of joy Trade "structure" is not directly proportional to trade VALUATION


All the comps are for picks. This is for a young top six player. Get it?

Hyperbolic example: if the bruins offered mcavoy, would people be on here saying, “well, Coleman got a first…think you gotta throw in a first rounder.”
Jun. 18, 2022 at 11:34 p.m.
#29
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
All the comps are for picks. This is for a young top six player. Get it?

Hyperbolic example: if the bruins offered mcavoy, would people be on here saying, “well, Coleman got a first…think you gotta throw in a first rounder.”


So basically you're saying that roster players and draft picks aren't able to have comparable valuation. WTF?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll