SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

wtf is going on here

Created by: JoeThorntonsBeard
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2022
Published: Jul. 13, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Labanc and simek have to be moved somehow, and having three NHL-capable goalies does not make a ton of sense for the sharks... these trades have to happen... Right? (This is Assuming Coe makes the team as well as Eklund and bords)

(im more excited for 6'4 100 point ohl guy - Brandon Coe than any other prospect at this moment.)
-other than eklund, obviously.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,300,000
2$2,300,000
1$925,000
2$1,250,000
2$900,000
6$3,400,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
4$1,250,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (ARI)
2.
SJS
  1. 2024 6th round pick (CHI)
CHI
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. 2023 5th round pick (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
  2. 2024 7th round pick (SEA)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SEA
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$68,082,501$0$382,500$14,417,499
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,175,000$2,175,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 13, 2022 at 11:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
2 years is going to cost you more than that. Id want a 2nd for 2 years at least.
Beetlejuice liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 11:07 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Sir
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 254
Likes: 16
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
2 years is going to cost you more than that.


the way the Blackhawks are getting rid of everybody on their team a top 6 defenseman, making 2 mil for 2 years is not that bad.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 11:11 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
the way the Blackhawks are getting rid of everybody on their team a top 6 defenseman, making 2 mil for 2 years is not that bad.


you just lost Burns, why would you need to dump a D man? We are rebuilding, so yes we are moving on from a lot of guys to allow the younger guys a chance to develop, we also have new management stamping their blueprint across the lineup. Obtaining a guy like Simek isn't high on the priority so for that to happen we would need to be paid.

No disrespect to Simek but you can probably get a guy with his output on a much cheaper deal and not be tied up for the 2 years.

We also have a lot of D in the pipeline and guys who are pegged to get a shot. We didn't sign any D Free agents as a priority for a reason.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 11:13 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Sir
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 254
Likes: 16
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
you just lost Burns, why would you need to dump a D man? We are rebuilding, so yes we are moving on from a lot of guys to allow the younger guys a chance to develop, we also have new management stamping their blueprint across the lineup. Obtaining a guy like Simek isn't high on the priority so for that to happen we would need to be paid.

No disrespect to Simek but you can probably get a guy with his output on a much cheaper deal and not be tied up for the 2 years.

We also have a lot of D in the pipeline and guys who are pegged to get a shot. We didn't sign any D Free agents as a priority for a reason.


Fair enough, Just looking to dump him somewhere, San jose also has a ton of LHD who jumped simek in the depth pool
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll