Stats are when Murphy was a Blackhawk which makes sense since the sample size is more then enough versus when he was a Coyote. We can of course take the sample of Joker when he was a Hawk and even worse statistically then he was last year if you prefer? The point is, you made a completely uninformed comment when you said Joker is as good or better then Murphy....that's simply not true when you dive into the deep analytics or when you use the eye test which is why everyone is arguing with you. It's okay to be wrong though so no harm no foul

I'm living in the present tense. Use stats from 2018 all you want. They are irrelevant.