No chance in hell you're getting a conditional 1st for Mittelstadt, let alone on top of Greenway.

This year:
Greenway: 31-2-4-6
Mittelstadt: 50-7-21-28

And the condition most would say is way out of reach. Are you saying you wouldn't give up a 1st for a young 2nd line center that give you 65 points? You are insane to turn that down. Most teams spend more for a rental. The condition is a safety net if he actually hits his potential.

Minnesota isn't going to do that trade with us

You forgot to keep building...

If you think he's actually gonna hit his potential, don't trade him. There's your safety net.
Not adding a conditional 1st, or even a 2nd, on to Greenway just because you want to focus on Greenway's one down year of the last four. Guarantee we can get a better offer elsewhere than a third line center, especially if we're adding conditional 1sts.

You wouldn't be giving a 1st round pick for a 3rd line center because 3rd line centers don't get 65 points. Not to mention lets say he only hits 60. You trade a 2nd and a guy playing his way out of your lineup for 60 points. And we trade him because we have enough skill in our top 6.

I disagree. More balanced bottom 6 + development from good prospects. We don't have to do anything huge to get better.

Ryan Hartman hit 65 and he's a bottom six player. Sam Steel is on his way to 40+ and he's waiver fodder. I'm not giving you a 1st just because Kaprizov turns nobodies into guys whose stat lines look like they're top six.

Let's make it a conditional 4th that becomes a 3rd if he manages to outscore his career high of...28 points... Greenway and Mittelstadt are both third liners. If you want Greenway, come up with a better offer. That's it.