Quoting: Buffalove
Sabres are gonna give up a high 2nd or an u protected 1st for a guy they’re gonna play on the 3rd pair???
No, i don’t think they are
That would be nutty
And we wouldn’t give up Kulich or Ostlund either
I'm not saying Edmundson is worth a 1st(ish), but the idea of a 1st for a 3rd pairing D needs context.
If you're giving up a 1st, it's not just about where that player goes on the lineup, but what other impact and trickle down effect it has on the roster as a whole, and what the market price ends up being for the player you think will best accomplish what you are looking for.
The goal here for example, could be to reduce/ease tough minutes for Dahlin/Power. Less time in the defensive zone and on the PK, could let you get more offensive minutes from Dahlin with more offensive zone starts. That could be enough to justify a 1st. You aren't just getting a 3rd pairing D, you're getting a percentage boost in quality minutes for your top guy.
Then there's the "playoff characteristics" teams are always looking to add, such as veteran leadership and Cup experience, toughness, size, etc., which you can get from a bottom of the lineup player without having to incorporate someone into the top of an already functional lineup.
You also get insurance should someone go down to injury, where suddenly your 3rd pair guy is now 2nd pairing.
There are a lot of reasons it could be worth spending a 1st on a 3D or bottom 6F. It's not as simple as those positions not normally being worth that kind of investment.