VAN's organization doesn’t seem to appreciate Garland, they can get him cheaper than the deal you suggested here

I mean, yeah. We accept

I agree but figured ppl would be complaining if I gave less I bet at least one person will comment saying that that's not enough for Garland

Leafs aren't trading the cost efficient and inexpensive and years of control Liljegren for Garland straight up. An you want the Leafs to add?

of course lol

I tried to avoid to much complaining but it didn't work lol

but really lily isn't all that

Gee he played 18 minutes a night on a good team 24 points in 67 games, plus 18. With Holl and Schenn UFAs and Brodie one year left, Liljegren is really needed. Garland may not even with his value at 4.9m, and wingers are easy to find.

fair enough but if we just going to keep adding defense at the deadline and keep pushing him out of the playoff roster might as well move him not really saying for Garland but in general

One reason Dubas was fired....kept on adding at the deadline for players that didn't help at all. McCabe added and dreadful against Florida, and the trade of Sandin didn't help the Leafs.

was happy with McCabe but the sandin one killed me honestly

So many think Van will dump Garland for nothing. Not happening. This is more realistic but maybe you're giving up a little too much. Maybe Van gives you your 3rd back in the exchange.