Flames fans, please, stop sending us Vladar and Hanifin...
1) Hanifin, and this was made widely known, was the runner-up target if Dubas couldn't land Karlsson. Our top-four is locked, ready and killing it. We're all good there. The most we may target is a depth guy, but even that is unlikely at this point unless a rash of injuries happen.
2) Our goaltending is good. We don't need Vladar. This is not a troll, and Flames like to pump is tires, but he's performed as a below average backup. If Ned gets injured long-term, could it be possible we'd target someone like him? Maybe, but you're not going to a 2nd+ for a guy like him.
3) The only Flames' player that makes real sense from the Pens' side is Dube. He'd be a solid fit in the bottom-six if a roster spot and cap space open up. This move would be tricky even with 50% retention, but may be workable.
I think you completely missed the point of this AGM.
You're pissy that Flames are sending you crap you don't need, I'm pissy that you made a post about considering your side of the fence, but didn't consider ours.
You're pissy that Flames are sending you crap you don't need, I'm pissy that you made a post about considering your side of the fence, but didn't consider ours.
No, I didn't consider yours, because again, you missed the point. This wasn't a real trade proposal. It was pointing out the only thing that would make sense for US.
Personally, I'm not that interested in Dube. You can keep him. I was just trying to lend perspective to all these CGY AGM's. We're really not good trading partners.
No, I didn't consider yours, because again, you missed the point. This wasn't a real trade proposal. It was pointing out the only thing that would make sense for US.
Personally, I'm not that interested in Dube. You can keep him. I was just trying to lend perspective to all these CGY AGM's. We're really not good trading partners.
Well then I just wanted to point out that the Flames can't retain. We're a just being FRIENDLY, pointing out eachothers errors the FRIENDLIEST way possible.
I don't know who's targeting the Pens we should be sending Lindholm to the Caps.
Well then I just wanted to point out that the Flames can't retain. We're a just being FRIENDLY, pointing out eachothers errors the FRIENDLIEST way possible.
I don't know who's targeting the Pens we should be sending Lindholm to the Caps.
There was no error in my AGM because again, I was showing the only way a situation would work on OUR END. I'm admittedly, again, (repeating myself here)... was NOT thinking of the CGY side of this, nor was it my intention to(as I previously explained), because again, repeating myself for those who don't read, was not treating this as a real trade, as I previously explained. But as usual, many just want to argue to hear themselves talk.
There was no error in my AGM because again, I was showing the only way a situation would work on OUR END. I'm admittedly, again, (repeating myself here)... was NOT thinking of the CGY side of this, nor was it my intention to(as I previously explained), because again, repeating myself for those who don't read, was not treating this as a real trade, as I previously explained. But as usual, many just want to argue to hear themselves talk.