I like the idea of those two in Toronto’s top 4 but neither package is enough. I don’t get how Liljegren is valued so high…basically the same or even higher here than Larson given the retention.?

@GM_SZK is right, that’s nowhere near the cost to acquire Tanev and be aware, Teams like EDM, VAN & TOR will have to pay a premium if they want to make a deal with CGY

I dunno. Hard to say his cost. Based off of several tanev trade discussions on this site, the medium consensus from Calgary fans is that this is roughly what it would take.

Well the value comes from the fact that liljegren is an rfa who fits Seattle's timeline and is probably a top 4 defenseman who can be had next year at an ok cap hit. Whereas Larsson has so far underperformed this year on an underperforming Seattle team and therefor he is somewhat undervalued.

I think they want a first not a third.

Could be, hey if the leafs got him for that and at that cap hit then congrats…but Liljegren is maybe a top 4 but more likely a bottom pair that doesn’t play in the playoffs…Larsson is a top pair.

He's not Lillibust is not going to get a pick swap and larsso with retention