SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

D and Depth

Created by: PurpleHippo
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 26, 2024
Published: Jan. 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Carrier would need to come with a reasonable extension in place.
Trades
NSH
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,274,167$850,000$4,200,000$225,833

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$807,500$807,500
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 26 at 5:22 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Easy no for the oilers why are we paying 1st and 2nd to downgrade the D lmao for minor upgrades on Offence this is a great example of terrible asset management
Jan. 26 at 5:24 p.m.
#2
Save Mcdavid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 1,224
At this point I honestly don't think Carrier is much of a upgrade on Ceci (unless Carrier is having a monster year that I don't know about), I agree we need to upgrade on Ceci but I think we can do better. I'd rather trade for Sissons over Novak, he would come much cheaper and would be a more effective piece. I feel like we overpay a bit here for a couple players we could do better on
Jan. 26 at 5:27 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 526
Likes: 233
Edited Jan. 26 at 5:33 p.m.
Quoting: Oilers_29
Easy no for the oilers why are we paying 1st and 2nd to downgrade the D lmao for minor upgrades on Offence this is a great example of terrible asset management


I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.
Jan. 26 at 5:32 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 526
Likes: 233
Quoting: NucksnOilers
At this point I honestly don't think Carrier is much of a upgrade on Ceci (unless Carrier is having a monster year that I don't know about), I agree we need to upgrade on Ceci but I think we can do better. I'd rather trade for Sissons over Novak, he would come much cheaper and would be a more effective piece. I feel like we overpay a bit here for a couple players we could do better on


Carrier brings a lot of puck movement and a bit better defending than Ceci, maybe something others dont value as they want a true defensive Dman with Nurse (I just really dont).
Also, Coffey has talked about the importance of being a puck mover and Carrier fits that description, most defensive Dmen I seen thrown around on this site in EDM ACGMs dont.

Novak is mostly due to his cap hit, he is an upgrade for our bottom 6 and may slot in well between Holloway/Kane or Holloway/Cloud, 100% see Sissons being more a fit in our bottom 6 if the cap would work.

The 1st being included is cause it's likely the price that would need to be paid, but Holland wouldn't trade for rentals so I included "extension in place".
NucksnOilers and SwarmChair liked this.
Jan. 26 at 5:37 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.

Why do you think carrier is better cause he’s not lmao he plays bottom pairing minutes which significantly easier than what Ceci plays against. Novak isn’t gonna produce the same as he does on Nashville cause he will play the 4C on limited minutes it’s just not worth it for Edmonton. This is a prime example of bad asset management I’m not trying to be dick but it’s true
Jan. 26 at 5:43 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.


Also carrier is 175 5’10 he isn’t the style of defensemen that holland is looking for. He has less playoff experience then desharneis and at this point I don’t really see him as an upgrade over desharneis with the way he’s playing this year
SwarmChair liked this.
Jan. 26 at 5:45 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 526
Likes: 233
Quoting: Oilers_29
Why do you think carrier is better cause he’s not lmao he plays bottom pairing minutes which significantly easier than what Ceci plays against. Novak isn’t gonna produce the same as he does on Nashville cause he will play the 4C on limited minutes it’s just not worth it for Edmonton. This is a prime example of bad asset management I’m not trying to be dick but it’s true


He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.
SwarmChair liked this.
Jan. 26 at 5:52 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.

Well I mean he plays on the 3rd pair so I would assume he plays bottom pairing minutes and he definitely isn’t the best RD on that team and he isn’t the style of defensmen holland is looking for holland is looking for a veteran defensemen with actual playoff experience not minimal experience and someone that’s over 6Ft 200Ibs not 175 5’10
SwarmChair liked this.
Jan. 26 at 6:02 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.


According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time
sammy1414 liked this.
Jan. 26 at 6:07 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 567
Likes: 94
Stop it with the Ceci trades! Oilers are on a 15 game winning streak with Ceci in the lineup
Oilers_29 liked this.
Jan. 26 at 6:29 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 526
Likes: 233
Quoting: Oilers_29
According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time


Across what category did you look at for that stat?
Jan. 26 at 7:07 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 3,418
Quoting: Oilers_29
According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time


Ranked 133😭😭 how far did you scroll down bruh

Oilers can keep Ceci. We’ve been over this, he sucks
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll