SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

23-24 Leafs

Created by: kous
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 27, 2024
Published: Jan. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Lyubushkin, Ilya ($1,375,000 retained)
ANA
  1. 2024 4th round pick (TOR)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$81,191,450$0$15,000$2,308,550
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,985,000$1,985,000 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,550,000$3,550,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
-$687,500-$687,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 27 at 5:56 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 741
Likes: 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, saying 'watch the games' sounds really dumb as an argument, doesnt it?


Its hard to have an educated conversation with you lol. Its similar to talking to my nine year old lol. I'll reach back out after the deadline bud after its settled
Jan. 27 at 6:19 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,751
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Commonsense27
Its hard to have an educated conversation with you lol. Its similar to talking to my nine year old lol. I'll reach back out after the deadline bud after its settled


dude, you keep saying things like this but clearly have no idea about hockey at all. Like if you had any idea how to read basic stats, let alone advanced ones or have the ability to analyze hockey past a don cherry rock em sock em video then you'd know that Monahan is a power play merchant. You keep insisting he's good defensively but obviously to anyone with eyes, have no idea what that means
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 27 at 6:35 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 741
Likes: 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
dude, you keep saying things like this but clearly have no idea about hockey at all. Like if you had any idea how to read basic stats, let alone advanced ones or have the ability to analyze hockey past a don cherry rock em sock em video then you'd know that Monahan is a power play merchant. You keep insisting he's good defensively but obviously to anyone with eyes, have no idea what that means


You have a problem bud lol. We'll talk after the deadline lol
Jan. 27 at 6:40 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,751
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Commonsense27
You have a problem bud lol. We'll talk after the deadline lol


lol, yeah we will and im sure you'll have an excuse just like all the habs fans last year when savard and Price didnt get moved and edmundson got a 3rd and a 7th with retention.
But hey, some dumb gm over paid for chariot and that convinced you and so many others that your trash was all worth 1sts
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 27 at 6:46 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 741
Likes: 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
lol, yeah we will and im sure you'll have an excuse just like all the habs fans last year when savard and Price didnt get moved and edmundson got a 3rd and a 7th with retention.
But hey, some dumb gm over paid for chariot and that convinced you and so many others that your trash was all worth 1sts


Don't generalize me bud. Be an edcuated debater and listen/read the points the person you're talking to and debate on that. I never said anything about Savard, Price or Edmunston. I did mention Chiarot howver, everyone thought I was crazy when I said someone would over pay and send a first for Chiarot. You just hate the habs so much that it clouds your judgement.
Jan. 27 at 6:52 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,751
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Commonsense27
Don't generalize me bud. Be an edcuated debater and listen/read the points the person you're talking to and debate on that. I never said anything about Savard, Price or Edmunston. I did mention Chiarot howver, everyone thought I was crazy when I said someone would over pay and send a first for Chiarot. You just hate the habs so much that it clouds your judgement.


/spends all day generalizing everyone else
"dont generalize me bud!"
You wouldnt know educated debate if it kicked you in the neck, you've stated nothing but your opinion and basically said nothing but "i know better than you because i watch habs games" in response. You have given zero information as to why you think Monahan is good past the fact that you think he is good.
I also love how you end it with you doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Tell ya what, give me one stat that shows monahan is good, or even passable defensivly. And please use faceoffs again, because that might be the dumbest example of a fake defensive stat that isnt +/-
Jan. 27 at 7:08 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 741
Likes: 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
/spends all day generalizing everyone else
"dont generalize me bud!"
You wouldnt know educated debate if it kicked you in the neck, you've stated nothing but your opinion and basically said nothing but "i know better than you because i watch habs games" in response. You have given zero information as to why you think Monahan is good past the fact that you think he is good.
I also love how you end it with you doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Tell ya what, give me one stat that shows monahan is good, or even passable defensivly. And please use faceoffs again, because that might be the dumbest example of a fake defensive stat that isnt +/-


The only thing you've said is "he is bad defensively" and you're talkiing about I've mentioned nothing? Lol. How stupid are you? I can't believe I have to repeat myself but, the reasons he is worth a first are 1- His cap hit will be a little over $900,000 with 50% retained. 2- On pace for 60pts on a team that doesn't score. He would be a point per game player playing on the leafs! 3- Versatile, could move up and down your lineup. Good enough to be a top line winger or could be a higher end third line center. 4- He plays both PP and PK and is good at both 5-One of the best faceoff guys in the league which is highly valuable in the playoffs 6- Everyone loves him in the dressing room. Former Captain and pretty good leader. 7- His defensive metrics in his own zone are decent.

HE IS GETTING AT LEAST A FIRST ROUND PICK AT THE DEADLINE lol
Jan. 27 at 7:13 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,751
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Commonsense27
The only thing you've said is "he is bad defensively" and you're talkiing about I've mentioned nothing? Lol. How stupid are you? I can't believe I have to repeat myself but, the reasons he is worth a first are 1- His cap hit will be a little over $900,000 with 50% retained. 2- On pace for 60pts on a team that doesn't score. He would be a point per game player playing on the leafs! 3- Versatile, could move up and down your lineup. Good enough to be a top line winger or could be a higher end third line center. 4- He plays both PP and PK and is good at both 5-One of the best faceoff guys in the league which is highly valuable in the playoffs 6- Everyone loves him in the dressing room. Former Captain and pretty good leader. 7- His defensive metrics in his own zone are decent.

HE IS GETTING AT LEAST A FIRST ROUND PICK AT THE DEADLINE lol


lol, so "because I said so" not a single stat or anything that I asked about to show that he is good defensively.
Jan. 27 at 7:18 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 741
Likes: 297
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
lol, so "because I said so" not a single stat or anything that I asked about to show that he is good defensively.


Ya, I'm done with you. I think I lost a few IQ points talking to you lol. I know you'll reply with another dumb take and you seem like a guy who couldn't handle not getting the last word in, so I'll stop engaging with you until after the deadline
Jan. 27 at 7:20 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,751
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Commonsense27
Ya, I'm done with you. I think I lost a few IQ points talking to you lol. I know you'll reply with another dumb take and you seem like a guy who couldn't handle not getting the last word in, so I'll stop engaging with you until after the deadline


so you cant come up with a single stat to prove your point. Got it, good job good effort.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll