Quoting: Shibbal18
50/50
so i defer to the logical arguement, because this is a business
One could say the logical thing to do would be to keep Mitts & trade among our stockpile of prospects
Sure, Mitts is a more valuable single piece
But we have more than enough extra pieces we can move & still be plenty ok with depth moving forward
Adams also has recent history signing our good young players to long term deals to lock them up
And no real history of moving them in big trades
Plus, while he may not exactly be on the “hot seat” per se,
the Sabres do need to start winning sooner than later
And Mittelstadt helps with that much more than Savoie, or Ostlund, or a variety of other good prospects who have good trade value
Also,
signing Mitts to a long term deal doesn’t mean we can’t still trade him if we decide to
It just seems to me that the thing that most logically happens,
is signing Mitts