SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanifin Colorado Tanev Vancouver

Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2024
Published: Feb. 7, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR Enabled: No
Season Days: 192
Days Remaining: 71
Season Remaining: 37%
Projected Cap Hit Prior To Days Remaining Tooltip : $84,134,665
Description
Trade Hanifin to Colorado for Samuel Girard, Jean-Luc Foudy, Jeremy Hazel, 1st round pick 2024 and conditional 4th round pick 2025
Condition: 2025 4th round pick will turn to 2025 3rd round pick if Colorado advances to 2024 Western Conference finals

Trade Chris Tanev to Vancouver for Ian Cole and conditional 2nd round pick 2025
Condition: 2025 2nd round pick will turn to 2025 1st round pick if Vancouver advances to 2024 Stanley Cup Final

Lineup After trades
Huberdeau/Sharangovich/Kuzmenko
Zary/Kadri/Pospisil
Mangiapane/Backlund/Coleman
Pelletier/Rooney/Duehr

Girard/Andersson
Kylington/Weegar
Cole/Pachal

Markstrom/Vladar

Scratches (for now): Greer, Gilbert, Oesterle
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  2. Girard, Samuel
  3. Hanzel, Jeremy [Reserve List]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
  5. 2025 4th round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
2025 4th round pick is conditional.
2025 4th round pick will turn to 2025 3rd round pick if Colorado advances to 2024 Western Conference finals
2.
CGY
  1. Cole, Ian
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
2nd round pick is conditional.
Condition: 2025 2nd round pick will turn to 2025 1st round pick if Vancouver advances to 2024 Stanley Cup Final
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,163,161$0$212,500$336,839
Prorated Cap Hit

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$3,882,813
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$1,146,354
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$2,033,854
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$319,253 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$2,588,542
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$286,589
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$1,811,979
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$1,978,385
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$2,144,792
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$319,253
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$480,729
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$305,078
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$316,480
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$1,848,958
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$1,682,552
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$2,218,750
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$924,479
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$2,311,198
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$813,542
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$1,109,375
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$286,589
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$342,057
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$281,966
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$281,966
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$850,521 ($1,150,000$1M$425,260$425K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 11 at 4:33 p.m.
#26
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,867
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
The reported ask from the Flames camp is a 2nd+, Raty is worth a 2nd+ on his own, he's a top-rated prospect.

You'll likely get a 2nd + c-tier prospect, or if you're retaining, a 1st + c-tier prospect

The Flames want a decent Player or Prospect back in addition to the Pick, so something better than a C-Tier and given the interest and demand for his services, I’m certain they’ll get it
Feb. 11 at 7:24 p.m.
#27
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: KingofRnR
The Flames want a decent Player or Prospect back in addition to the Pick, so something better than a C-Tier and given the interest and demand for his services, I’m certain they’ll get it


According to all the reports, they're asking for a prospect or a roster player, if the Flames were wanting something more than a C-Iter prospect, it would have been specified as "A top prospect" or "a middle-six/top-six roster player," no reports have. You were wrong about the Zadorov and Lindholm trades, you're wrong about this one, too. Listen to the reports. No one has been willing to trade a 2nd + C-Tier prospect, most of the reports are teams wanting to just deal the 2nd to Calgary. We'll see as we get closer to the deadline whether teams are willing to increase their offers or if the Flames just let Tanev walk in July.
Feb. 11 at 7:36 p.m.
#28
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,867
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
According to all the reports, they're asking for a prospect or a roster player, if the Flames were wanting something more than a C-Iter prospect, it would have been specified as "A top prospect" or "a middle-six/top-six roster player," no reports have. You were wrong about the Zadorov and Lindholm trades, you're wrong about this one, too. Listen to the reports. No one has been willing to trade a 2nd + C-Tier prospect, most of the reports are teams wanting to just deal the 2nd to Calgary. We'll see as we get closer to the deadline whether teams are willing to increase their offers or if the Flames just let Tanev walk in July.

LOL - Get outta here, you don’t have a clue my friend. I was off on Zadorov because of the timing and a 3rd + 5th isn’t terribly far off from the 2nd UNRETAINED I was predicting

I don’t remember proposing much on Lindholm, so not sure how I could have been wrong there

You know how much demand and interest there is for Tanev right!? And that’s he’s been #1/2/3 on all Trade Boards

We shall see, but I guarantee they = Hanifin & Tanev either extend or get shipped out by the TDL. Conroy isn’t interested in another Johnny Gaudreau fiasco and take those “Reports” with a grain of salt. All these Hockey People/Insiders/Journalists have Quotas to fill, Click Bait to Write and Viewers to Attract and Entertain so write up whatever Rumors and Scenarios they see fit
Feb. 13 at 3:23 p.m.
#29
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: KingofRnR
LOL - Get outta here, you don’t have a clue my friend. I was off on Zadorov because of the timing and a 3rd + 5th isn’t terribly far off from the 2nd UNRETAINED I was predicting

I don’t remember proposing much on Lindholm, so not sure how I could have been wrong there

You know how much demand and interest there is for Tanev right!? And that’s he’s been #1/2/3 on all Trade Boards

We shall see, but I guarantee they = Hanifin & Tanev either extend or get shipped out by the TDL. Conroy isn’t interested in another Johnny Gaudreau fiasco and take those “Reports” with a grain of salt. All these Hockey People/Insiders/Journalists have Quotas to fill, Click Bait to Write and Viewers to Attract and Entertain so write up whatever Rumors and Scenarios they see fit


I do have a clue, I predicted the Zadorov trade value and Lindholm. Tanev unretained is a 2nd +

I do understand the interest in Tanev, I'm saying that this is the price teams are willing to pay. Tanev is 34 and a UFA. Teams last season were paying a 1st + 3rd for mid-20s RFA defensemen with an extra year left. The idea that you think you can get as much value as that for Tanev is ridiculous. A 2nd + (or a late 1st if retained or a team doesn't have a 2nd) is the value of Tanev.
Feb. 13 at 3:31 p.m.
#30
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,867
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
I do have a clue, I predicted the Zadorov trade value and Lindholm. Tanev unretained is a 2nd +

I do understand the interest in Tanev, I'm saying that this is the price teams are willing to pay. Tanev is 34 and a UFA. Teams last season were paying a 1st + 3rd for mid-20s RFA defensemen with an extra year left. The idea that you think you can get as much value as that for Tanev is ridiculous. A 2nd + (or a late 1st if retained or a team doesn't have a 2nd) is the value of Tanev.

I’m saying a 2nd + B Prospect/Player OR a late 1st UNRETAINED. With retention there’ll be an extra piece and a bidding war could force a clear over pay like Chiarot got

We’re pretty much saying the same thing other than you think it’ll be crappier secondary piece and I’m saying it’ll have to be something more promising to become or is already NHL Caliber
Feb. 13 at 5:03 p.m.
#31
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: KingofRnR
I’m saying a 2nd + B Prospect/Player OR a late 1st UNRETAINED. With retention there’ll be an extra piece and a bidding war could force a clear over pay like Chiarot got

We’re pretty much saying the same thing other than you think it’ll be crappier secondary piece and I’m saying it’ll have to be something more promising to become or is already NHL Caliber


You claimed the same bidding war would affect Zadorov, it didn't.

Teams aren't willing to pay that much for Tanev. You're not getting a 2nd + B prospect. I doubt Calgary gets a 1st unless they're taking salary back, A team like Toronto would have to be very desperate.
Feb. 13 at 5:36 p.m.
#32
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,867
Likes: 1,868
Quoting: westleysnipez
You claimed the same bidding war would affect Zadorov, it didn't.

Teams aren't willing to pay that much for Tanev. You're not getting a 2nd + B prospect. I doubt Calgary gets a 1st unless they're taking salary back, A team like Toronto would have to be very desperate.

Zadorov didn’t make it to the Trade Deadline either did he

Flames Ownership will make TOR pay extra. They have no reason to be friendly with or help out Treliving. TOR is desperate but doesn’t have much to offer and of course Tanev would need to be retained on to fetch a 1st
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll