SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Trade Deadline

Created by: kscoop
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 9, 2024
Published: Feb. 9, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Lohrei a direct replacement for Hanifin in Calgary. Calgary would get a 1st in another deal but that player likely will not be better than Lohrei who is NHL ready. I love Ullmark and don't think the Bruins trade him until the offseason but I think it is time to capitalize on a deal for him. If not LA I would look to another team will high playoff hopes, ie: the Devils. Nico Sturm for Matt Grzelcyk is a straight swap. Maybe Grier can re-sign Grzelcyk (Boston connections) or flip him for a pick.
Trades
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Talbot, Cam
  2. 2024 1st round pick (LAK)
3.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$77,258,334$4,500,000$1,000,000$6,241,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,475,000$3,475,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 9 at 9:02 a.m.
#1
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 551
This doesnt really do anything for the sharks. Our dpool is already bloated, especially on the LH side
kscoop liked this.
Feb. 9 at 9:07 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 596
Likes: 155
Flames aren't taking that for Hanifin lol
Feb. 9 at 9:09 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 159
Quoting: DontTradeDougie
Flames aren't taking that for Hanifin lol


Probably right but like I said the 1st they get from another team will be a late pick and likely will not be better than Lohrei.
Feb. 9 at 9:11 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 596
Likes: 155
Quoting: kscoop
Probably right but like I said the 1st they get from another team will be a late pick and likely will not be better than Lohrei.


The return would be a 1st and Lohrei not one or the other
Feb. 9 at 9:28 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 548
Likes: 186
The Bruins aren't going trade Ullmark mid-season. They'll shop him at the draft again.

I'm still against trading Lohrei for Hanifin. I would rather them get forward depth or a Middleton type.
Feb. 9 at 9:34 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,793
Likes: 8,838
Swap Steen for a 2nd you might have shot.

LA declines. No cap space. Plus…Talbot has same stats as Ullmark this year. Don’t really see the point.

SJ declines expiring contract Grizz has zero value to them without an extension and i doubt either party would be interested.
Feb. 9 at 12:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 1,172
Edited Feb. 9 at 1:05 p.m.
Quoting: Gofnut999
Swap Steen for a 2nd you might have shot.

LA declines. No cap space. Plus…Talbot has same stats as Ullmark this year. Don’t really see the point.

SJ declines expiring contract Grizz has zero value to them without an extension and i doubt either party would be interested.


1. If you offered Forbort or Grz, Lohrei, a 2nd, and a prospect like Merkulov, Harrison or Jelvik for Hanifin (w/ enough retention to make him salary neutral to Forbort or Grz) … I think it should be a serious consideration. Only way Boston does that is if they feel there is a risk that he may sign elsewhere. Reports are he has a large contingent of family and friends the Bruins game two days ago, If they are confident, they keep the players and the picks

2. Linus Ullmark is 4th in the league in GSAx/60 for goaltenders with more than 15 starts. Hes at .501. Talbott is 32nd at .081. They are not even remotely close. That said, the Kings leadership staff has made the decision to go with a cheap goalie and hope for league average performance. That’s what they are getting. Its by design, so they won’t trade for Ullmark, I could see a scenario where they offer PLD for Ullmark and other considerations to get out of that contract, but they probably show patience based on their public disclosures about their goalie positions. If they did that, it would be more to get off of PLD than to acquire Ullmark even though it gives them more much long term salary flexibility
Feb. 9 at 10:51 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1,001
Sharks trades to acquire LD are not interesting
Feb. 10 at 10:36 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,793
Likes: 8,838
Quoting: Celtics21
1. If you offered Forbort or Grz, Lohrei, a 2nd, and a prospect like Merkulov, Harrison or Jelvik for Hanifin (w/ enough retention to make him salary neutral to Forbort or Grz) … I think it should be a serious consideration. Only way Boston does that is if they feel there is a risk that he may sign elsewhere. Reports are he has a large contingent of family and friends the Bruins game two days ago, If they are confident, they keep the players and the picks

2. Linus Ullmark is 4th in the league in GSAx/60 for goaltenders with more than 15 starts. Hes at .501. Talbott is 32nd at .081. They are not even remotely close. That said, the Kings leadership staff has made the decision to go with a cheap goalie and hope for league average performance. That’s what they are getting. Its by design, so they won’t trade for Ullmark, I could see a scenario where they offer PLD for Ullmark and other considerations to get out of that contract, but they probably show patience based on their public disclosures about their goalie positions. If they did that, it would be more to get off of PLD than to acquire Ullmark even though it gives them more much long term salary flexibility


Their GAA and SV% are almost identical. Yes a deeper dive shows that is misleading due to the inordinate amount of high danger chances Ully has faced this year. Considering their tandem’s cap hit they have gotten plenty of bang for their buck. Their lack of cap space makes it difficult to upgrade.

No interest at all in PLD…none…but i have been toying around with 3 way deals, with Ully/Grizz/3rd piece going to LA, PLD going somewhere (Chicago or Montreal being the ones I use most), and high end prospects to Boston.

Fixes a pair of LA problems while moving PLD before trade protection kicks in.
Boston gets a blue chip center prospect, light blue but blue, and other decent piece(s) and cap space to pursue Noah + needs.
Fun to play around with, but pipe dream.
Feb. 10 at 3:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 1,172
Edited Feb. 10 at 3:39 p.m.
Quoting: Gofnut999
Their GAA and SV% are almost identical. Yes a deeper dive shows that is misleading due to the inordinate amount of high danger chances Ully has faced this year. Considering their tandem’s cap hit they have gotten plenty of bang for their buck. Their lack of cap space makes it difficult to upgrade.

No interest at all in PLD…none…but i have been toying around with 3 way deals, with Ully/Grizz/3rd piece going to LA, PLD going somewhere (Chicago or Montreal being the ones I use most), and high end prospects to Boston.

Fixes a pair of LA problems while moving PLD before trade protection kicks in.
Boston gets a blue chip center prospect, light blue but blue, and other decent piece(s) and cap space to pursue Noah + needs.
Fun to play around with, but pipe dream.


With injuries, Boston’s defensive structure hasn’t been as good this year primarily because of injury even though the goalie play gets artificially downgraded. His GSAx is impressive and frankly that statistic is much more relevant than simple stats like GAA and save % especially considering that the Kings have been labeled one of the more favorable teams in terms of helping their goalies where Boston is at the midpoint

I’d consider PLD for Ullmark and DeBrusk, which is basically a get out of jail free card for the Kings. I just don’t see either team doing that while filling their biggest need. The question is whether this is a good move for team culture for Boston
Feb. 10 at 3:57 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,793
Likes: 8,838
Quoting: Celtics21
With injuries, Boston’s defensive structure hasn’t been as good this year primarily because of injury even though the goalie play gets artificially downgraded. His GSAx is impressive and frankly that statistic is much more relevant than simple stats like GAA and save % especially considering that the Kings have been labeled one of the more favorable teams in terms of helping their goalies where Boston is at the midpoint

I’d consider PLD for Ullmark and DeBrusk, which is basically a get out of jail free card for the Kings. I just don’t see either team doing that while filling their biggest need. The question is whether this is a good move for team culture for Boston


Again and I can’t say it strongly enough. I don’t want PLD on this team no matter what it costs. If they are flipping him great. If not…🤬 no.
Feb. 10 at 4:08 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 1,172
Quoting: Gofnut999
Again and I can’t say it strongly enough. I don’t want PLD on this team no matter what it costs. If they are flipping him great. If not…🤬 no.


Fair. Think sometimes get looking at deals that could have happened and temporarily forget about what makes this team special. Culture is important
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll