arber xhakaj is not avaialble
we drafted his brother

we said so in many press conferences

kentu huges said it many times

you dont read, or maybe choose not to, any hockey news at all do you?

You don’t get Z

Simple as that

Chicago drafted dachs brother, and they traded Dach away.

shall we list all the genius things chicago has done lately?

arber xhekaj is not available.

you muppet

I hope we don't trade Xhekaj. I hope he's in the future plans. But if the door comes knocking, and the offer is too tempting, then I'm not gonna be an idiot and say no. I love Xhekaj, but you can't keep him because of his narrative and fighting abilities.

you and i are not kent hughes

kent is hughes

he says xhekaj is not available.

you are still a muppet. but maybe in the 3rd star wars film. ewoks

Savard isn't available, but Hughes is taking calls, is he not?

Also out of curiosity, I wanna see how far this stubbornness goes. Would you trade Xhekaj for matthew Tkachuk?

a gm takes calls yes. its basically the entire job.

kent was quoted as saying that savard is not being shopped, and that his door is always open.

kent did say that he has in fact REJECTED trades for arber, and that he is in fact not availble.

kind of different isnt it?

|no i dont want matthew tkachuck. iw oudl take marshmallow matthews either. arber ftw.

go find your own.

Okay last 2 hehe

McDavid 1 for 1 Xhekaj
Or
Bedard 1 for 1 Xhekaj

Question for you, if you trade Xhekaj which Montreal player will bring physical play in the game ?

Sadly there not many answers possible right now.

I get it, but I wouldn't prioritize the physicality of one great fighter for a chance to get scoring depth.

I love Xhekaj, and I want him here, I just don't think he is an "untouchable" people are making him sound like the messiah.

I wanna keep him, but if there is a "too good to be true" offer on the table, I'm gonna take it.

And we do have some physical players, they just appear minimal compared to the Sheriff