21, 86, and 38 can only carry this team for so long. Prioritizing Conor Sheary based on the chance or even the belief that he gets his sh*t together and produces something with Kucherov and Point over Steven Stamkos isn't a solution. We're also missing both viable right shot and top six forwards.

Can't complain about this defense though, just start to develop Lilleberg/Thompson as NHL talents or one of the extras over De Haan instead.

this was a continuation of the other AGM where Sheary actually preformed on the first line with Kuch and Point

The thing is though that sheary didnt even have great numbers when he was on a line with Ovi or Crosby. Being only a 0.5 ppg playing 15 minutes a night with Ovi or Crosby should make a player a ppg easily and he was only close to doing that once 8 years ago.

Sorry dude, but I just can't get behind the idea of him as a top six forward, if he succeeds or not. Watching him these last few days has been beyond abysmal, nearly every play dies on his stick and passes get fumbled like I'm watching the manlet version of Jameis Winston on skates. Aside from his only nasty pass to Merela for his first career goal Sheary just hasn't looked good at all, even now playing with Stamkos on line 2. Everyone knows that 21/86 and 91 can turn scrubs like Namestnikov and Barre-Boulet into point scorers, but a 31 year old veteran like Sheary shouldn't have to be revived just to produce at less than a 0.5PPG pace on line 1 at the cost of sacrificing other quality top six options playtime or hold the youth like Goncalves back from developing at the NHL level.