Edited Apr. 15 at 10:41 a.m.
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Netflix didn't make cuts because they were expensive to make, they made cuts because the streaming war has cut away at their growth and profit margins.
They aren't the only game in town and they can no longer spend without being competitive just like Disney.
Sports aren't cheap and wwe isn't a sport, it's fake....crazy right, i know you thought it was real. In many cases they have found paying for sports no one watches isn't worth it. Which is why many large brands have walked away from expensive sports advertising, like the superbowl. But keep thinking the shrinking audience doesn't matter.
The fall of cable has nothing to do with viewership. The numbers aren't balanced out by streaming. This is a known fact. They are just gone.
Every analyst has said... people just watch highlights on their phone now, they don't watch the games. So that's a dead argument. You think a shrinking audience doesn't mean shrinking revenue, it does.
For the record no one ran from the McAvoy conversation. There are many comparables out there. Again the point is he's not getting 11.5. in 2 years You just don't want to admit that.
You can cry Makar isn't relevant all day.... but it is and that's that. He's not making more than him. The production isn't there 2 years shorter deal or not.
and yet 3 body problem got higher ratings than the NHL ever will.
Jesus Christ you really are stubborn enough to keep making yourself look like more and more of an idiot.
1. This is kinda the same thing dude... They made cuts because the movies weren't worth what they were spending on them anymore.
2. Uhh yes, sports are very cheap compared to original content. And whether you like it or not, WWE is a regular event, broadcasted from an arena, that sells their broadcasting rights to the highest bidder. I never said it was a sport. It does operate on a similar business structure as sports, particularly when it comes to broadcasting. But I'm not surprised you had to nit-pick at this because your arguments have been pathetic thus far.
3. Weird. "Many large brands have walked away from expensive sports advertising, like the superbowl", and yet the Superbowl keeps charging more and more for ads...
4. "You keep thinking a shrinking audience doesn't mean shrinking revenue, it does." Well this is just a weird argument considering... The revenue isn't shrinking.
5. Nah bud, you definitely ran from the McAvoy conversation when you tried contesting what his contract would inflate to and then found out that it was indeed $11.3M.
6. There's no crying about Makar's relevancy. There's laughing that you keep bringing it up because it's stupid.
A player on his third contract at 8 years buying six years of UFA is not remotely close to a player on his 2nd contract at 6 years buying two years of UFA. In fact... The 8 year deal proposed for Seider on his second contract is comparatively WELL UNDER what Makar got, for more years. Keep eating Ls on this, though.
You can yell and scream and **** and moan until you're blue in the face that they're the same, but they're not.