SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vegas revamp

Created by: Mmicc44
Team: 2024-25 Vegas Golden Knights
Initial Creation Date: May 10, 2024
Published: May 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Can save some money in not signing Carpenter, finding a cheaper RD than Chatfield, or a cheaper backup than Lankinen. But yeah. Not a bad lineup
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,000,000
2$1,200,000
2$975,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
2$2,250,000
2$1,650,000
1$925,000
Trades
1.
VGK
  1. Marner, Mitchell ($2,903,000 retained)
  2. Petruzzelli, Keith [RFA Rights]
  3. Robertson, Nicholas [RFA Rights]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Brisson, Brendan
  2. Pietrangelo, Alex
  3. Roy, Nicolas
  4. Thompson, Logan
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (VGK)
  6. 2026 2nd round pick (VGK)
2.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
2026
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$87,419,150$0$0$80,850
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
$975,000$975,000
LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,650,000$1,650,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RW, C
UFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$7,350,000$7,350,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,200,000$5,200,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$4,900,000$4,900,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 4
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,294,150$2,294,150
LD
RFA - 1
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,200,000$1,200,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 10 at 3:38 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 536
Likes: 106
nein!
May 10 at 3:39 p.m.
#2
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,287
Likes: 1,685
That Toronto trade is terrible. Why are we adding Brisson and Roy to what’s already good with Petro and LT(who’s not being moved. Literally can’t get a cheaper goalie)
May 10 at 3:46 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 105
Likes: 2
Brisson for Robertson
Two future 2nds for a current 1st (used to grab Laughton)
Pietrangelo and Thompson for Marner retained, Roy added to make money work.
Petruzelli added to shore up Vegas goaltending (Leafs have 3 very good young goalie prospects already so they can spare Petruzelli)

I guess maybe you can scratch one of Vegas 2nds and take out Brisson if that makes you feel like it's a more fair trade. I'd still do that if I'm a Leafs fan.
May 10 at 4:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 9,103
Likes: 3,528
Edited May 10 at 4:13 p.m.
Quoting: Mmicc44
Brisson for Robertson
Two future 2nds for a current 1st (used to grab Laughton)
Pietrangelo and Thompson for Marner retained, Roy added to make money work.
Petruzelli added to shore up Vegas goaltending (Leafs have 3 very good young goalie prospects already so they can spare Petruzelli)

I guess maybe you can scratch one of Vegas 2nds and take out Brisson if that makes you feel like it's a more fair trade. I'd still do that if I'm a Leafs fan.


Two future 2nds won't get you a current 1st, why overpay for Laughton anyways? Don't think he's much different than Roy.

Better to keep LT, since it would allow them more flexibility. Pietrangelo + LT + Roy probably won't be what the Leafs are looking for Marner especially with retention. Pietrangelo is just too old. I think Theodore + would make more sense, but the Leafs aren't retaining on Marner without getting a haul. Maybe something like Theodore + Karlsson for Marner + Liljegren + a 5th.
May 10 at 4:18 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 337
Likes: 166
Flyers would take that.
Mmicc44 and radtad liked this.
May 10 at 4:29 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 105
Likes: 2
Quoting: GMBL
Two future 2nds won't get you a current 1st, why overpay for Laughton anyways? Don't think he's much different than Roy.

Better to keep LT, since it would allow them more flexibility. Pietrangelo + LT + Roy probably won't be what the Leafs are looking for Marner especially with retention. Pietrangelo is just too old. I think Theodore + would make more sense, but the Leafs aren't retaining on Marner without getting a haul. Maybe something like Theodore + Karlsson for Marner + Liljegren + a 5th.


I can see Leafs wanting Piet more than Theo, mainly because of him being right handed. Vegas gets out of the possible crap years of that deal. I'll be honest, I thought of Karlsson instead of Roy, but I feel like losing Stephenson and Marchesault already would make Vegas hesitate to lose another original Golden Knight.

I think if you tweak it to maybe Pietrangelo, Karlsson, prospect for Marner (no retention) + Liljegren+ low pick or Petruzelli, then maybe that works out.
I'd still like for the Leafs to somehow find a way to grab Thompson too in that deal. Even if it means adding their 1st for like a 4th in return or something.
May 10 at 4:51 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 9,103
Likes: 3,528
Quoting: Mmicc44
I can see Leafs wanting Piet more than Theo, mainly because of him being right handed. Vegas gets out of the possible crap years of that deal. I'll be honest, I thought of Karlsson instead of Roy, but I feel like losing Stephenson and Marchesault already would make Vegas hesitate to lose another original Golden Knight.

I think if you tweak it to maybe Pietrangelo, Karlsson, prospect for Marner (no retention) + Liljegren+ low pick or Petruzelli, then maybe that works out.
I'd still like for the Leafs to somehow find a way to grab Thompson too in that deal. Even if it means adding their 1st for like a 4th in return or something.


Yeah, that's fair I won't say that the Leafs wouldn't be interested in Pietrangelo, but I think they would need something for the future. I do think Pietrangelo might be more reluctant to move, he seems like he's a guy that wants stability for him and his family, so he might nix any trades. He does have ties in Toronto, but I don't think he really even considered signing there when he was an FA (not that they were able to offer him as much as Vegas). I wouldn't be surprised though if Theodore put the Leafs on his NT list either but he's lost his PP time to Hanifin so maybe he would be willing to move on. Reason why I think Karlsson might as well be added is because they might need to move him the following year anyways to extend Marner, Theodore/keep Pietrangelo, and fill out the rest of their roster.

I don't think it's essential that the Leafs add a goalie here since they could look at other trade options or just sign someone in free agency, and to me it seems like an inconvenience for VG. Both him and Hill do tend to struggle with staying healthy, but he's so cheap that I think for them adding someone in season if needed would be the best option.
Mmicc44 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll