PIT declines.

Sharks decline both trades.

Sharks laugh at both those trades, ANA might agree if they get Mitch with an extension.

Marner trades are speculative to the point of mootness because we can't tell, and nobody knows, whether we're getting one season of Mitch Marner or seven, so this is idle and meaningless conjecture.

Anaheim projects that five of the top 6 forward positions are set for the near future: Zegras and Gauthier at LW, Carlsson and McTavish at C, and Terry at RW. Marner would obviously be a nice sixth, but we've seen absolutely no reason to believe that he would sign a long-term contract in Southern California. One season of Marner does us no good because there's no chance that adding him would make the Ducks a playoff team in 2025 -- the Ducks finished TWENTY GAMES out of the playoffs this year, and Mitch isn't going to overcome that. And the idea that Anaheim would trade the third overall selection in this year's draft or the third overall selection in the 2021 draft, let alone both, isn't merely unrealistic -- it's hallucinatory.

You're kidding about Anaheim, right? OP wants 3OA AND McTavish.

We wouldn't give up either of those pieces, extension or not.

What's more delusional, thinking the core 4 in Toronto can win the cup, or thinking Mitch Mariner pulls McTavish + 3OA?

It's the latter, and by a long shot

I'd rather have McTavish than Marner.

All day long!



They are all kinda of delusion up there



Anaheim would actually NEVER do any kind of business with Toronto ever again if this was brought up — this is one of the worst Marner to Anaheim trades that’s been posted and there’s been tons of them