SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ac3L1ght it works you just wish it didnt

Created by: T0R
Team: 2024-25 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 17, 2024
Published: May 17, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just takes a little imagination
Trades
MIN
  1. Marner, Mitchell ($3,500,000 retained)
TOR
  1. Gustavsson, Filip
  2. Rossi, Marco
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
2025
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
2026
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$87,700,000$85,458,255$425,000$2,000,000$2,241,745
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,403,000$7,403,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$886,667$886,667 (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,125,000$4,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$775,000$775,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,450,000$2,450,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 17 at 12:22 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 812
Leafs pass
May 17 at 12:33 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 8,707
Don't think Toronto would want to retain though.
May 17 at 5:26 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 949
Quoting: Lancebmx
Don't think Toronto would want to retain though.


We’re getting a great 2C
May 18 at 4:05 p.m.
#4
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,416
Likes: 3,648
Wild accept!
May 18 at 7:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,544
Likes: 3,200
Quoting: MNBassman
Wild accept!


The f*** we do!
May 18 at 7:08 p.m.
#6
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,416
Likes: 3,648
Quoting: RazWild
The f*** we do!


It wouldn’t take me 1/2 a second to accept that trade!
May 18 at 7:30 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,544
Likes: 3,200
Quoting: MNBassman
It wouldn’t take me 1/2 a second to accept that trade!


Then with respect.

Paying that for ONE YEAR of a player we can neither afford to keep/re-sign or is a position we need is asinine.
It wouldn't take me a 1/2 second to tell Treleving to f*** off and hang up the phone.
MNBassman liked this.
May 18 at 9:29 p.m.
#8
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,416
Likes: 3,648
Quoting: RazWild
Then with respect.

Paying that for ONE YEAR of a player we can neither afford to keep/re-sign or is a position we need is asinine.
It wouldn't take me a 1/2 second to tell Treleving to f*** off and hang up the phone.


I wouldn’t make the deal unless I knew Marner was going to be resigned.
May 19 at 9:58 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 949
Quoting: RazWild
Then with respect.

Paying that for ONE YEAR of a player we can neither afford to keep/re-sign or is a position we need is asinine.
It wouldn't take me a 1/2 second to tell Treleving to f*** off and hang up the phone.


You can resign Mitch you have about 12 mil of dead cap coming off next season
May 19 at 11:23 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,544
Likes: 3,200
Edited May 19 at 11:31 a.m.
Quoting: T0R
You can resign Mitch you have about 12 mil of dead cap coming off next season


Of which $9M of it promptly is going to cover Faber's long-term contract. Getting Marner and KEEPING HIM means losing Faber for the long haul.

It ain't just about one player we don't f***ing need, when it means keeping other, younger, cheaper, talent. Especially when said talent is a much bigger need.

No thank you.
May 19 at 11:31 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,544
Likes: 3,200
Quoting: MNBassman
I wouldn’t make the deal unless I knew Marner was going to be resigned.


How are you affording Faber's next contract then? By all accounts it sounds like he's getting at least $9M.

The team cannot realistically afford Marner at $12M, Faber at $9M, and Kaprizov at another $12M. Not with the roster as constructed or even with the increase in cap space. There's just not enough to go around.

Even if you COULD make the money work. You're just turning the team into f***ing Toronto. Who can't afford to ice a full roster because it's too top heavy and can't afford quality depth. So that's an excellent strategy.
May 19 at 2:35 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 949
Quoting: RazWild
How are you affording Faber's next contract then? By all accounts it sounds like he's getting at least $9M.

The team cannot realistically afford Marner at $12M, Faber at $9M, and Kaprizov at another $12M. Not with the roster as constructed or even with the increase in cap space. There's just not enough to go around.

Even if you COULD make the money work. You're just turning the team into f***ing Toronto. Who can't afford to ice a full roster because it's too top heavy and can't afford quality depth. So that's an excellent strategy.


THE CAP IS GOING UP, YOU HAVE ENOUGH MONEY STOP ACTING LIKE THE CAP ISN’T MOVING, IT’S SUPPOSED TO JUMP MASSIVELY NEXT YEAR WHEN MARNER IS UP & YOU GET 13 MIL OF DEAD CAP OFF CAP AS WELL, YOUR CONCEPT OF “oH wElL jUsT bE tHe LeAfS wItH nO mOnEy FoR dEpTh”, the Leafs would have been got depth IF THE CAP WASN’T STAGNANT GUESS WHAT NOW IT ISN’T, TEAMES WILL BE PAYING MULTIPLE STARS SOONER THEN LATER

MARNER AT 11
FABER AT 8-9
KAPRIZOV AT 13
BOLDY AT 7

IS NOT CAP HELL WHEN THE DAMN THING IS GOING UP, YOU’Ll have around 40 Mil im Cap room in 2 years & you’re actually saying “Well we have no money”🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
MNBassman liked this.
May 19 at 3:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,544
Likes: 3,200
Quoting: T0R
THE CAP IS GOING UP, YOU HAVE ENOUGH MONEY STOP ACTING LIKE THE CAP ISN’T MOVING, IT’S SUPPOSED TO JUMP MASSIVELY NEXT YEAR WHEN MARNER IS UP & YOU GET 13 MIL OF DEAD CAP OFF CAP AS WELL, YOUR CONCEPT OF “oH wElL jUsT bE tHe LeAfS wItH nO mOnEy FoR dEpTh”, the Leafs would have been got depth IF THE CAP WASN’T STAGNANT GUESS WHAT NOW IT ISN’T, TEAMES WILL BE PAYING MULTIPLE STARS SOONER THEN LATER

MARNER AT 11
FABER AT 8-9
KAPRIZOV AT 13
BOLDY AT 7

IS NOT CAP HELL WHEN THE DAMN THING IS GOING UP, YOU’Ll have around 40 Mil im Cap room in 2 years & you’re actually saying “Well we have no money”🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


Massively?

The f*** are you on about?

By your own admission, that's $40M tied up in FOUR players. Sounds EXACTLY like the Leafs. How's that working out for you guys?

The cap is going up FOUR MILLION, which only gives Minnesota $7M in cap space this off-season. Will it go up in consecutive years? Maybe. Unlikely, but maybe.

But you don't build your roster around maybe's. Particularly when it comes to cap related reasons. We will have $40 Million to resign 10 players, or did you miss the part where Minnesota only has 11 players signed through until the dead cap goes down?

Depending on Faber's contract, the Wild will have only roughly $30M left to resign RFA's like Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, AFTER signing Faber. Plus they'll need to fill out the rest of the roster too. $30M for 9 players goes pretty quick there, guy. Paying Mitchie Boi another $12M means the Wild would only have $18M left to fill 8 spots. $18M left for all RFA's in need of a contract, any additional UFA depth additions, plus a likely goaltender to replace Fleury after his retirement. Since it seems likely Gustavsson is also on the move this off-season.

So please, explain to me again. In big Boi words. How Minnesota is expected to pay half of it's future roster in two years with only $18M in cap space. I'll wait.

And don't sit there and say the cap's going up again. It's not a viable response or argument. Because you don't plan out future contracts and roster plans on maybe's or potential possibilities.
May 19 at 3:55 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 949
Quoting: RazWild
Massively?

The f*** are you on about?

By your own admission, that's $40M tied up in FOUR players. Sounds EXACTLY like the Leafs. How's that working out for you guys?

The cap is going up FOUR MILLION, which only gives Minnesota $7M in cap space this off-season. Will it go up in consecutive years? Maybe. Unlikely, but maybe.

But you don't build your roster around maybe's. Particularly when it comes to cap related reasons. We will have $40 Million to resign 10 players, or did you miss the part where Minnesota only has 11 players signed through until the dead cap goes down?

Depending on Faber's contract, the Wild will have only roughly $30M left to resign RFA's like Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, AFTER signing Faber. Plus they'll need to fill out the rest of the roster too. $30M for 9 players goes pretty quick there, guy. Paying Mitchie Boi another $12M means the Wild would only have $18M left to fill 8 spots. $18M left for all RFA's in need of a contract, any additional UFA depth additions, plus a likely goaltender to replace Fleury after his retirement. Since it seems likely Gustavsson is also on the move this off-season.

So please, explain to me again. In big Boi words. How Minnesota is expected to pay half of it's future roster in two years with only $18M in cap space. I'll wait.

And don't sit there and say the cap's going up again. It's not a viable response or argument. Because you don't plan out future contracts and roster plans on maybe's or potential possibilities.


UNLIKELY to go up in consecutive years?, it’s projected to spike massively, are you that naive?, seriously & sorry if your GM can’t figure out paying RFA’s with 18 mil in cap room (more likely it’s near the 20-25 mil mark unless you plan on keeping Foligno & Gaudreau’s full contract), it is easily possible if you sign your RFA’s to bridge deals not to mention likely 25% of your prospects will BUST or not reach their ceilings that means Qualifying offers bud, unless you’re telling me your bottom 6 is making 3-5 mil a comtract?

Your concept that the cap “might” go up is a complete fabrication especially with the boat anchor that was Arizona now gone & done with, The cap is expected to SPIKE MASSIVELY, GET THAT THROUGH YOUR SKULL, it’s not “oh it might”, IT WILL SPIKE TO NEARLY 10-15+ mil in the next 3 years
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll