SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

AMH95

Member Since
May 21, 2023
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
17
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 22, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
Thread: Idkkkk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>The Leafs supposedly want to shed the cap of one of the big 4. Does that mean they have to give them away for free?

At minimum, Arvidsson returns a 2nd and a good prospect.</div></div>

Leafs want to “apparently” shake up the roster not shed the cap. Personally I don’t think they should move one of their core 4 anyway but if they did the one that would get dealt is Willy. Without moving him they have around 15M in space, they don’t need to shed cap.

Arvidsson doesn’t have to get dealt but they’ve already said they want to move his cap to resign gavrikov. Also have to resign Villardi and a ton of RFA. They’d probably need that 11M or so to make it all work. Seems like less leverage in their favour, keep Arvidsson and lose Gavrikov or move Arvidsson and keep Gavrikov. Arvidsson also on last year of his deal, lowers value slightly.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 22, 2023 at 2:20 a.m.
Thread: Idkkkk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Markassmark</b></div><div>You gotta think the Canucks, rangers, and kings can get a better return for those guys. I get that you see them as a cap dump but another team would probably beat the offer of 5th and 6th round picks</div></div>

Kings I could see getting more for sure, just depends how badly they’re trying to shed his cap, they could keep him for all we know! Van had a hard time moving Garland already and are in a hole, don’t think they have much leverage. Rangers really depends how badly they need the cap space and if they’re actually trying to move on from him. Tbh so much more goes into these deals than we know I just kept them all similar for the sake of seeing how the leafs roster would look like in this situation!