SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Ajp_18

Member Since
Mar. 21, 2018
Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
9851
Posts per Day
4.4
Forum: DiscussionNov. 27, 2023 at 5:38 p.m.
Thread: Problematic users
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>Sorry man, I disagree and have read the entire post. While there's snark there sure at one point, its totally tolerable and within the rules IMHO. No more than some of my replies to be absolutely honest. As much as its annoying as f***, "goading" at least that level isn't infraction worthy if its done within the rules.

I do believe this was more against the rules than anything he did:



And this IMHO looks like a power trip as there was clearly nothing done to cross any lines.



Listen, i prefer the mods take the onus themselves to correct the situation if there is some sort of dispute against them because 1) If I just delete everything it just looks like we're just trying to cover everything up and 2) if you were given an warning/infraction, they'd never know about it which only leaves them questioning if mods are above the law so to speak.

Honestly, just easier for everyone to get ahead of it and clear the air. Believe me, if I truly felt he was in the wrong here I'd gladly be throwing down some words but I can't in good conscience say he did anything wrong there and if anything, respectfully, you were much more in the wrong than he was.</div></div>

Finally got around to it. It's been a bad week for me and I think my emotions got ahead of me on this one, even so far as getting in my own way for getting an apology out.

In more focused news, what's the mood of the room for permanently banning user Campabee during his next infraction?
Forum: DiscussionSep. 17, 2023 at 11:58 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 9:35 a.m.
Thread: CGY TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Trevor31lv</b></div><div>Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockey_Soul</b></div><div>I get they don't <em>have</em> to trade him, but a 3rd is fair value. Maybe a 2nd but that's only in a unique situation that may never come to fruition. I'd take the pick and relieve a bit of the log jam in front of Jiricek. There's no rushing, he's a stud and should be getting NHL minutes.</div></div>

The move is to hold him til the trade deadline and reap more than a third from a team desperate for a shutdown RD.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 8:32 a.m.
Thread: CGY TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockey_Soul</b></div><div>No incentive? How about not have 2.75m sitting in the press box? Peeke and/or Boqvist are extra. I'd take a 3rd for Peeke or a 2nd for Boq. Jiricek is too damn good. He needs to play. I'm fine with keeping one and brining up Jiricek when there is injury, but both Peeke and Boqvist don't need to stay.</div></div>

Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 15, 2023 at 11:21 a.m.
Thread: Will Conroy ever do anything
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DontTradeDougie</b></div><div>Way too much? A top 10 protected pick and a centre who had 11 points last year? LMFAO</div></div>

Charactering him solely by his scoring 11 points last year is selectively ignoring a much larger context, like the fact that he had 31 as an 18-year-old rookie, or that the team was massively injured this past year and he was playing with rotating and subpar linemates, and the fact that he himself was injured going into the season and during.

He also went down to Cleveland towards the end and had a nice rebound with 6 pts in 11 games.

He also is still only 20 years old, possesses one of the better work ethics you'll find, and is not afraid to play physical. He will be a solid defensive middle six center, much like Baklund or Charlie Coyle. He shouldn't be traded, at least not now when his value is lowest, and not for an overrated one-year rental.