DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
DarthRightus
Bruins are Pond Scum
Member Since
Mar. 6, 2023
Forum Posts
356
Posts per Day
0.8
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
Tue. at 5:26 p.m.
Thread:
Youll need em all
Bye CF you poverty **** Capitals can have it. You'll need all the fkn help you can get.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 31 at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
2nd pair d man if you keep Hronek
wtf is this?
give us 2 1sts or dont call on Willander
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 29 at 3:42 p.m.
Thread:
Car - Van after Free agency starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PenguinMullet68</b></div><div>With Mikeyev or JK you are paying $5,000,000 either way and a 3C is better bang for your buck then a winger that can’t score and big buyout difference between the two, Mikeyev has $2,000,000+ cap hit next year if bought out while you could buy out JK in the next 3 years and each cap penalty is under $900k per season</div></div>
why would you buy out ilya and extend that money? they're not comparable. ilya becomes dumpable soon with low term. jesperi is a terrible contract for tons of money for tons of years and we can't afford it.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 27 at 10:54 p.m.
Thread:
Car - Van after Free agency starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PenguinMullet68</b></div><div>I’d rather have JK then Mikeyev because it’s cheap to buy out JK then Mikeyev and also JK is still only 23 and a decent 3C</div></div>
Jesp has 50 years left on his deal.
and if you wanna pay 5 mil for a 3c then pick any other team
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 27 at 8:36 p.m.
Thread:
Car - Van after Free agency starts
0% we're taking jesperi's term in this deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 15 at 3:27 a.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>I’m okay with moving Hronek, but that doesn’t change the fact that your proposed trade in this ACGM is terrible value for the Canucks</div></div>
I would Beg for Philly to take this deal.
On my knees.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 15 at 12:22 a.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>That’s a terrible trade for the Canucks. Hronek >> a late 1st and Mikheyev + 2nd >> a meh prospect</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Using a 1st pair RHD to dump a slightly overpaid middle 6 winger who’s struggled his first season back from knee surgery (but has still been good defensively) is Benning level management
If we need to pay a lot to dump Mikheyev we’re better off keeping him. It was also reported at the deadline that he doesn’t have negative value so we may be able to get something for him
Even if you think he’s a dump, he’d cost at most a 2nd to dump, possibly less. Leaving Hronek for a late 1st and meh prospect which is terrible for the Canucks</div></div>
Took two weeks from this for every single person to agree that Hronek needs to go.
You still think I'm throwing away Hronek?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 10 at 5:52 p.m.
Thread:
Better than Brad
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>Marner isn’t waiving
But even if he was, the Sabres are NOT bringing in a big contract like that
ZERO INTEREST</div></div>
its a 1 year deal you dingus.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 10 at 1:20 p.m.
Thread:
Better than Brad
i dont really care if the stamkos part is unrealistic. you could sign guentzel for a bit more in that slot or maybe someone else. space is there for a big UFA regardless.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 7 at 6:36 p.m.
Thread:
MarnerSaros
whats nashville gonna do with marner and no goalie?
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 5 at 11:59 a.m.
Thread:
Van - Det Youre going to want to hear this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Julius_Freezer</b></div><div>You want Demko AND Podkolzin? The price is Raymond, Cossa and Veleno, don't like it? Then **** off.</div></div>
nobody wants veleno. give us real players.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 5 at 12:56 a.m.
Thread:
nailed it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>And we also get significantly worse. We lose a top pair RHD for a 2nd/3rd pair LHD, and even with his struggles Mikheyev is significantly better than Anderson just off of his defensive ability. He also outproduced him this season despite it being his first off a torn ACL</div></div>
Anderson vs Mikheyev is just saving some money. They dont matter either way.
If you think Hronek is a top pair D for the future and is worth the 7 mil(ish) he's asking for then please find a different team to cheer for and take him.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
May 4 at 2:52 p.m.
Thread:
nailed it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>No reason for the Canucks to downgrade on defense and on the wing in a straight swap</div></div>
we save 6.5 million in cap. so yes there is.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 1:05 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Risto is the only guy on IR lol. Ellis is medically retired and apparently Johansen will be too. Nobody is coming to help this team. Farabee is probably getting moved this offseason too lol.</div></div>
if farabee gets traded then thats fine. but i dont hate my trade because you think something might happen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1 at 12:37 a.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>We already are rebuilding. We sold in the summer, stocked up on picks, and sold at the deadline when we were in a playoff spot. If you selling in a playoff spot doesn’t tell you a team is rebuilding idk what does.</div></div>
You're not tearing it down though. Farabee is on too good of a deal. You just paid Tippett. Seeler, Sandheim, guys on IR might come back. This team wants to be good when Michkov comes over.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 11:07 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>And we don’t want Mikheyev, the dude is a massively overpaid 3rd liner.
None of this fits are rebuild anyway so it’s pointless</div></div>
We know you don't want mikheyev. But you might want to gamble on hronek before you pull a rebuild. You can't rebuild and keep Torts and you're not kicking out Torts. So I think Philly is playing for wins without paying a ton to try. This deal helps that. The penalty is mikheyev, not losing a bunch of prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 11:05 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Using a 1st pair RHD to dump a slightly overpaid middle 6 winger who’s struggled his first season back from knee surgery (but has still been good defensively) is Benning level management
If we need to pay a lot to dump Mikheyev we’re better off keeping him. It was also reported at the deadline that he doesn’t have negative value so we may be able to get something for him
Even if you think he’s a dump, he’d cost at most a 2nd to dump, possibly less. Leaving Hronek for a late 1st and meh prospect which is terrible for the Canucks</div></div>
hronek isn't what you think he is. 12 points in his last 39 games while being a liability on defense. we all saw that he couldn't hold any pace the full season. but he's gonna ask 7 million. We can't sign him and I think a lot of people know it.
it's sad that you took this and tried to overreact instead of looking at data. Maybe you're Benning here.
Oh btw, he does have negative value for us. because our cap space is pinched. If he had 1 year left, maybe it's just a second.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 9:37 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>I don't love the trade and that's a big hole on the right. Big Z says he isn't comfortable on the right. Can't see Van adding a pick.
Not feeling 3 years for Martinook. Rather see another RHD signing like Tanev or Walker instead.
Top 6 is great though.</div></div>
If we have to make another move for the RD spot thats fine. We will regret paying Hronek for that spot though. He's asking too much.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 9:36 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>That’s a terrible trade for the Canucks. Hronek >> a late 1st and Mikheyev + 2nd >> a meh prospect</div></div>
We're paying Hronek to dump Mikheyev and getting something out of it. We'd be lucky to get this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 9:36 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Yeah agreed this is only possible if Risto goes the other way</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Renegade_H</b></div><div>IDK. Danny B apparently wants a RHD but we gotta shed Risto if we are doing this trade.</div></div>
Risto would have to go to a third team. That would be a non canucks trade. We don't want him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 4:30 p.m.
Thread:
affording Jake
I expect a Cole McWard type to replace Juulsen if needed. Either way it would be in system or a waiver type swap out with PDG.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 31 at 7:47 p.m.
Thread:
Life is hard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Hronek already reportedly turned down 6.75M. He’ll get 7-7.5M most likely. I like Joshua and would love to keep him but I’m hesitant to give him that much money</div></div>
Still don't wanna pay Dak 3 mil? :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 31 at 2:00 a.m.
Thread:
Life is hard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Don’t love giving Joshua 3M, and Hronek definitely gets more. Guentzel probably does as well</div></div>
Joshua will get 3 somewhere. Hronek might get closer to 7 but not hit 7. His underlyings are bad. Guentzel might take this number because of our comps.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
Mar. 19 at 4:40 p.m.
Thread:
Laf to VAN
overpay for a 20 goal scorer with low-mid upside
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 1:35 p.m.
Thread:
bleh
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>I wouldn’t give Joshua 3M. If that’s his ask let him walk imo. Doubt Lindholm re-signs as well
You also forgot about the cap raise so you’d have another 4.2M to work with</div></div>
i just built within. didn't need to use cap raise. (but i should have adjusted anyway) i would pay both of those players what i offered and it think its possible they both stay.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com