SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Habs420

Member Since
Jun. 18, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
118
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 11:48 a.m.
Thread: Oilers get two rumoured players
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SMH</b></div><div>It's not, ryan McLeod is a good player but isn't what the habs need, we don't need more middle 6 player's</div></div>

I disagree. There is a difference between having bottom 6 forwards and having the right ones. we have a lot of young talent that hasn't earned top 6 minutes so they get played in bottom 6 roles in hopes of developing into a top 6 roles. We need forwards that play in appropriate roles for their game. Don't get me wrong getting a first would be great, it has great value, but picks between 20-32 like this one are hit and miss and take a long time, so hughes would be packaging it up for a roster player anyways. He also doesn't seem like the type to be so rigid in the construct of the trade. Accept.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 1 at 12:27 p.m.
Thread: NYRMTL Monahan to help with Chytil out
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div><strong>Habs are not trading Monahanwithout gerring back a 1st + 3rd</strong> apparently this needs to be bolded for fans of other teams to understand that.</div></div>

One I am a habs fan. Two I would agree that they are looking for that kind of value, but I disagree that they would value getting a 1st over getting a prospect that may have a chance of playing in the NHL sooner. I'll say getting a first would still be nice cause I could see them packaging up the pick at the draft for a roster player. I just don't think Kent is the type of manager to be so rigid to say "I want a first and 3rd and nothing else.

What about a Condition edit where if the rangers make the eastern conference finals and Monahan dresses 50% of the games the 2nd becomes a 1st.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 1 at 9:33 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 31, 2023 at 2:57 p.m.
Thread: 2024 TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Terrifiedofeveryone</b></div><div>Winnipeg isn’t really pressed for cap so I’m not sure they’d want to add value to Schmidt just to offload him. If as you say Monahan and Savard are fits for their bottom-6/third-pairing, I doubt they’d want to give up a quality prospect like Lucius. The Jets are more likely to package Barron, a pick, and a prospect for a 2c upgrade and then pay a mid-round pick for a 6/7D upgrade.</div></div>

Fair response. I think both Monahan and savard are 3rd line pairings on great (stanley cup contending teams) On bad teams ( like the habs now) 2nd line. In order to get a 2nd C upgrade better than Monahan that pick in a Barron trade will have to be a 1st and the prospect would probably be a former 2nd rounder not much worse than Lucius, like NIKITA CHIBRIKOV.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2023 at 12:32 a.m.
Thread: Is there something here
Answer me something if erik Karlsson is a free agent and you can have him on your team but you have to pay him 11.5 million for the next 4 years, are you going to do it. honestly, I'm not. so I am offering sanjose out of that contract two years early, in order to swap 1st round first round picks take the guy I want (Smith), allow you to still select the player you want (Michkov), I'm giving you back a veteran right shot defenseman to fill the void of what is obviously going to be a rebuilding two years. You can take my two quality roster players and a first rounder. But ya I'd rather have Karlsson decrease his value over the next two years and get nothing for his crappy contract in two years. You will never get real value for Karlsson and you are currently as close as you can get. but to pay a defenseman 11.5 mill if you can say you can get a first rounder even if it is florida's I take that as a win.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2020 at 2:12 p.m.
Thread: Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>But, they don't. You clearly haven't been paying attention to the offseason moves made by Ken Holland. Here are both team's top-9 based on last year's stats:

<strong>Edmonton: 7.69 total</strong>
Draisaitl: 1.55 P/GP
McDavid: 1.52
Yamamoto: 0.96
Nugent-Hopkins: 0.94
Kassian: 0.58
Neal: 0.56
Kahun: 0.55
Ennis: 0.53
Turris: 0.50

<strong>Montreal: 5.33 total</strong>
Tatar: 0.90 P/GP
Gallagher: 0.73
Danault: 0.66
Tofolli: 0.65
Suzuki: 0.58
Drouin: 0.56
Armia: 0.52
Lehkonen: 0.39
Byron: 0.34

Weal at 0.31 would slot behind Edmonton's Chiasson, Archibald and Puljujarvi. That puts him outside the top-12 in Edmonton. At $1.4M you'd have to pay Edmonton to take him - you aren't getting one of their promising prospects in return.</div></div>

sorry I went so aggressive on the return there boys and your right I haven't watched edmontons moves I thought from a brief look there was a spot for improvement on the 4th apparently not, thats fair. was just looking to dump weal somewhere, I am fine with with sending him to the minors too. this was mostly supposed to be lineup based
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2020 at 1:56 p.m.