SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Jeeerrd

Member Since
Jul. 18, 2018
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
75
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
Thread: Garland
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jeeerrd</b></div><div>Thats totally fair but its hard to watch someone that cant stay in the lineup. I just think if the Bruins are trying to had scoring and they can target someone like Garland who is cheaper this year and doesnt have the health issues Kase does. Maybe the trade above is an over payment or whatever but it really doesn't matter if Kase isnt on the ice. Believe or not I liked when they picked up Kase last season I thought he would be good but the only thing was his health. I think that if he stays healthy he would do well. But over the course of his career hes never played a full season. Hes never played more than 70 games in a year and the last 2 his games played have been going down. The Bruins only have so many more kicks at with Bergeron, Krecji and Marchand who are all in their 30s.</div></div>

Garland could also get injured, you can't predict that but that's not the issue. They'll probably have to overpay for a guy who is only in his second full NHL season and is a fringe 2nd liner. He could struggle just like the other forwards currently in the Bruins' middle-six. Then, you've given up valuable assets and you can't use them for an actual game breaker. Risk is part of the business but if you can get a better player, target that guy over Garland.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25, 2021 at 9:37 a.m.
Thread: a new hope
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mwasylko34</b></div><div>A 40 goal scorer is not a cap dump. Is he overpaid? Absolutely. To give him away with a prospect and 2 picks for a 7th round pick is garbage. No one bats an eye at his contract if he scores 30-40 goals like we know he does. Rather have Risto and if we do trade him it is not for that. Kakko is not good, Laf is good yes but Rangers are not trading him. Im overrating Eichel by saying that trade is trash. Buffalo is not giving up those two players and 2 picks for that package. Hes a top 15 player in the league and people act like hes worth a bucket of pucks</div></div>

skinner hasn't had a 40 goal season in years, he washed, he has the worst contract in the nhl and it should cost 3 1st to move him. The fact is he is never going to score 30-40 goals again, no one going to take that contract in a flat cap league, and if you think he has positive value you're delusional
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 3, 2021 at 9:25 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 17, 2020 at 11:17 a.m.
Thread: trying out trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Barilko14</b></div><div>Because some leafs blogger has been writing articles and suggesting trades like this (capfriendly level, pure homer trades) and a big enough group of the fanbase is taking them at face value and trying them out on here.</div></div>

You've got to be kidding me that a blogger, someone who spends a good majority of their time writing articles, is this demented to suggest the Hawks would trade the former #8OA and top 5 NHL defensive player under 20 years old plus the #17OA pick in this year's draft for a 1 year rental goalie in Anderson who statistically is worse then Crawford. Nevermind the Hawks will sign Crow without giving up any assets and already have an offer out to him. You'd think a blogger would be a little more educated.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23, 2019 at 1:49 p.m.