Kam23

Member Since

Jan. 17, 2024

Favourite Team

St. Louis Blues

2nd Favourite Team

Washington Capitals

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.3

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:42 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PHEN</b></div><div>Yeah. Too many prospects. Ostlund/Rosen and a 2024 1st top 5 protected for Buch. Maybe a B level prospect too to St Louis.</div></div>

With an extension already in place for Buch or not like is him just saying he is willing to sign good enough for you?

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:37 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Schuyler</b></div><div>it was the 2019 draft which is a very similar draft talent wise to 2024 yotes paid 27 34 and 45 to move to 11 in 2022</div></div>

Thought you were talking about the 2922 draft how is 2019 like this years draft? And wouldn’t agree that 16 56 81 for 10 not close if not more valuable than 14 45 for 11 anyways

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:25 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I'd rather NJD just pick at 10 tbh</div></div>

Is there someone you are targeting?

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:21 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>*they’re

Yes, 100% agree (but cannot imagine either makes it to #10)</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>If Dickinson or Buim are there at 10 their Devils</div></div>

I don’t think either drop past 8 tbh

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:18 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I think trading down for NJD might be wise move. Most of the core is set…and the holes to plug (3C, defensive dmen, heavier middle-six winger, depth, goalie) may be easier to do with multiple picks. Generally, I don’t see a huge difference between 10 and 16 unless you are targeting a specific position, which NJD probably aren’t. The best trade down scenario I have seen is Minnesota’s #13/Gustavsson for #10.</div></div>

Damn I doubt the Wild do that but if the Devils get that offer they should accept right away. Wonder what the thought process is for Wild in that trade scenario.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:16 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stadel</b></div><div>It's very unlikely the Sabres trade down or any of their 1st round forwards. They have a recruitment problem. When nobody wants to waive their NTC and no FA wants to sign with you, prospect development becomes the paramount focus.</div></div>

I agree prospect development is important for them but when you have so much good prospects and young players wouldn’t it make sense to use the picks to get players that help now. Trading back let’s you do both maybe you use the 2nd or 3rd you get but trade the 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 9:10 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>noted</b></div><div>I heard the press conference. He said he is going to try to resign him. Also needed to make sure Buch was on the same page in that they might not be competitive for a bit. Never did he say that he wasn’t going to trade him…</div></div>

He didn’t say it directly but both parties sound interested in an extension I would be really surprised if doesn’t have an extension before next season

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 7:55 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Schuyler</b></div><div>I'm just saying historically its a severe underpayment arizona paid pick 14 and 45 to move up to 11</div></div>

Well I think the Yotes overpaid in that one and could afford to considering all the picks they have. Armstrong loved Geekie and nobody expected him to be available at 11 going into the draft.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 7:50 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PHEN</b></div><div>We would be looking to trade 1st rd pick 2024 and things for Buch.</div></div>

You guys already have Kulich, Benson, Peterka, and maybe Wallberg or Ostlund who prob get moved to a left wing spot. Unless you’re moving some of that in the Buch trade or another trade I don’t think it makes sense for the Sabres.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 7:45 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KrakBirds23</b></div><div>Kraken pass. Bigger hole in top prospects on the blue line. They'll go with Firkus and Nyman being their top prospects on the RW.</div></div>

Nyman has always on the left side and the only prop spect or young player in the organization that has nhl potential is Firkus and that’s it. The kraken already used two seconds last year and one before that on D and you left side is already locked in with Dunn, Evans, Price, etc.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 7:38 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Schuyler</b></div><div>for the blues to get the devils pick it would likely cost 16 both 2nd rounders and a 3rd. Per https://puckpedia.com/pickvalue</div></div>

I think that’s way too much for just 6 spots maybe I would add a 3rd or switch the Toronto second to the blues one but if it’s more than that I would stand pat. The thing with calculators it doesn’t take into account the strength of the draft and the draft tiers along with the teams situation (needs).

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 7:32 p.m.

Thread: Trading up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PHEN</b></div><div>We would be looking to trade 1st rd pick 2024 and things for Buch.</div></div>
Idk if you heard Armstrong in these press conferences he loves Buch he isn’t gonna trade him, he is gonna try to resign him I thought he should’ve traded him at the deadline

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 6:01 p.m.

Thread: Fixing Flaws

Blues trade is good I (Blues fan) would try to keep the 5th but if the Devils are adamant I’m cool with including it. Only issue is I can’t see the Blues trading up if Buium, Levshunov, Parekh, Dickinson, and Silayev are gone before the Devils pick.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 1:45 a.m.

Thread: Leafs

Blues probably do this trade if Sundqvist is willing to leave STL to join a contender

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 1:41 a.m.

Thread: Nucks post cup win

Buchnevich deal not enough your getting for 2 years at 5.8 he isn’t expiring. It’s gonna take at least a 1st (Which is gonna be really late cuz the bucks are good) and a top defensive prospect which is a major need for the blues so Wallinder as the base of the trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 1:35 a.m.

Thread: Cost

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>islesadist</b></div><div>lol that would be a good place for a GM to be fired for giving that much up</div></div>

Your getting a top line forward for two playoff runs at a good cap hit that is a fair price.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 1:29 a.m.

Thread: Cost

Buch is a top line winger that produces at a higher than ppg level while playing elite defensively all while on a bargain 5.8M for 2 playoff runs. He would cost the canucks first which is late this year, Willander, and a decent roster player. I don’t think the blues would want Kuzmenko so a third team might need to be included to make the money work. If you want 50% retention on Buch for th next two years your gonna have to add another 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 3:10 a.m.

Thread: Rumor Boys

I think the Torpo trade is fair

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 3:06 a.m.

Thread: Trade Deadline - 2C

I would say with no retention probably a second with 50% retention prob a late first (Seravalli said so as well).

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 2:51 a.m.

Thread: Calm TF Down

2 cap dumps, an injury prone prospect that can’t crack a full time role in the nhl, a b prospect, and late first isn’t getting you anything of value and don’t even get me started on the retained salary

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 2:45 a.m.

Thread: Dont be upset

The blues wouldn’t want anything to do with that Woods contract. There isn’t even a need for forwards anyways you would have to add a really good sweetener to make it happen. Blues aren’t gonna do the avs any favours.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 2:35 a.m.

Thread: Hughes Presser

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Andy_Dick</b></div><div>Clearly, you dont watch him play on any night and even if you do. The info is available online. You STL fans certainly are something else. Nothing but negative responses on a defenceman better than anything you have atm. And, hes not even available, regardless. Maybe, check his stats in Montreal... Just a thought.</div></div> habs fans as per usual overrating their players (and prospects for that matter). You will never get a lottery pick for him so keep dreaming and I do watch the habs a good amount. Thank goodness he isn’t he available we dont want him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 4:09 a.m.

Thread: Hughes Presser

That Matheson deal is absolute garbage idk who you think Mathewson is lol

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 4:03 a.m.

Thread: Pens

Blues say no for sure 2 ahlers and an overpaid winger that was cap dump a couple months ago isn’t getting you much back at all. I wouldnt even trade a third for that actually the pens might have to sweeten tbh

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 3:58 a.m.

Thread: Chychrun to St Louis

The blues prob say no that 1st rounder is extremely valuable and the blues could just try signing him when he hits free agency no need to overpay

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Kam23

Kam23

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day