SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

LAKANDTOR348

Member Since
Jul. 27, 2017
Favourite Team
Los Angeles Kings
2nd Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
71
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 6:09 p.m.
Thread: Realistic offseason but with a fun Marner trade to spice it up lol
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NucksnOilers</b></div><div>Top-4 d-men at the deadline go for mid-late 1sts, just look at Walker, Tanev and Hanafin this year, same with Gourde since he's a middle 6 centre, just look at Henrique. Now the people hating on Wright are just the same overreactive idiots who went after Hughes, Laf, Byfield and Slafkovsky when they didn't immediately breakout. In 8 games this year he had 4 goals and has done the same in the AHL, he's looking to be a sure-fire 30 goal- 75 point 2C for the Kraken in the future. It's completely fair to call Marner a top 10 player but he is also just a single player, a hockey team is made up of around 20-22 players. The package Seattle is offering here is essentially one future top line centre, one top-4 d-man, one middle 6 centre, one top-15 pick and two potential other roster players. That would be far and away the biggest package in NHL history, they would also have to sign Marner to a 12.5-14 million dollar extension. Just not worth it for them</div></div>

not saying wright can’t break out. I’m just saying what I’m hearing from the insiders we probably listen too. but truthfully, after where you just explained, it definitely is an overpriced by Seattle. I just like the Players that we get back and where they fit in the lineup
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 5:54 p.m.
Thread: Realistic offseason but with a fun Marner trade to spice it up lol
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NucksnOilers</b></div><div>On hell of an overpay, that's the type of package Matthews or Mackinnon would go for. Wright alone is already a lot for Seattle to give up and with how good he's looked I don't think they're gonna want to move him. Same with the 25'1st which will probably be top 15 again with their roster, Larson and Gourde could go for late 1sts on their own + the two 2nds. Marner on the open market would probably get A+ Prospect + roster player + 1st + 2nd. This is like that times 2

Edit: Everything else looks pretty good though!</div></div>

I get that but Larsson Last year of the deal and gourde. I know he’s still very young, but it doesn’t seem like a lot of people have the most hopes in Wright. I could be completely wrong and probably am I just like the people that we get back in it. and Marner is a top 10 all rounded player. That’s not saying he is a top 10 player though.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 11 at 1:37 p.m.
Thread: Realistic offseason but with a fun Marner trade to spice it up lol
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KrakBirds23</b></div><div>Kraken decline. Only player you listed that might be available is Gourde. Wright and Larsson aren't going anywhere soon.</div></div>

Dude, you get a top 10 ALL-around player. I'm not saying a top 10 best player, I am talking about all aspects of the game, and he is still in the prime of his career. Wright has a lot of question marks around him and Larsson is about to be 31 and with 1 yr left. He probably gets traded at the deadline if they aren't in a playoff spot. And Gourde is 33 I think and wasn't that good this year. Like if Mitch agrees to this which is a big IF, this is an offer that intrigues me. Like what I said in the description and in the trade description.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 3 at 10:52 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 2:22 p.m.
Thread: Question fans Please respond and read description
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WN88</b></div><div>Doesn't even matter anymore.

John Tavares isn't a star anymore, and his contract will be up soon anyway. There was always an issue with allocating that much of the cap to those 4 forwards, but that won't be an issue once JT is gone.

Even if you hate Marner, you still NEED superstars in order to win a cup. Obviously, you need depth, but the stars are way harder to acquire. Once Tavares' new contract kicks in, it'll be much easier to fill the holes on the roster. Having Marner-Matthews-Nylander making 11-13 million dollars each won't hinder the team the way our previous structure did.

Nevertheless, if you wanted to trade Mitch (assuming he'd waive), you're likely not getting anything back from a team that would actually be equivalent to the impact/value Mitch has. An elite #1 defenceman would be the only thing that could work, but no team is giving up their elite #1 defenceman.</div></div>

Multiple things here. I agree. It will be easier when JT is done with this contract, but we haven’t won **** besides 1 playoff round. 2) you don’t need more than 1 or 2 superstars to win in my opinion. Also it can very from person to person from which person decides a player is a star or a superstar. But When looking at next year’s FA’s Matt Roy, Dylan Demelo, Tanev, Myers, Pesce and Hakanpaa. Ideally with all the talk about rebuilding the Dcore I’d love a Rielly-Demelo, Blank(Maybe Hanafin)-Roy and McCabe- Tanev,Myers or Hakanpaa so that makes me want to go get a 2nd line C. We will have cap space depending if we make a Mitch trade and what the cap return we get back. TIMMINS won’t be on this team next year
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread: Question fans Please respond and read description
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SomeonesOffended</b></div><div>Top pair RHD is the only solution if he waives</div></div>

i’m saying if he waives what do you think is a realistic trade? When looking at next year’s FA’s Matt Roy, Dylan Demelo, Tanev, Myers, Pesce and Hakanpaa. Ideally with all the talk about rebuilding the Dcore I’d love a Rielly-Demelo, Blank(Maybe Hanafin)-Roy and McCabe- Tanev,Myers or Hakanpaa so that makes me want to go get a 2nd line C. We will have cap space depending if we make a Mitch trade and what the cap return we get back. The Depth Forwards are also available next year which we can rebuild the bottom 6 but not really a top 6 F besides Lindholm and he would cost too must and personally I don’t think we should buy at this year’s TDL
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2023 at 4:48 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 28, 2023 at 1:43 p.m.