NucksnOilers

Save Mcdavid

Member Since

Nov. 26, 2018

Favourite Team

Edmonton Oilers

2nd Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

2912

Posts per Day

1.5

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 3:46 p.m.

Thread: Getting Younger

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MitchJr</b></div><div>Leafs don’t need LHD</div></div>

If they have Mccabe play the right side they could slide Dumoulin up into the top 4

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 4:22 a.m.

Thread: Trying to break up the streak

To get Stamkos to play for the Sabers it's gonna cost like 4 x 9.5

For Monahan to it'll have to be 3 x 5.5

To get Roy to it'll have to be 6 x 6

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 4:20 a.m.

Thread: offseason

Lmao no chance the Kraken do that, that's like having Chicago trade Korchinski to dump Jones's deal

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 12:36 a.m.

Thread: 2nd overall pick

Edmonton rejects, Barron isn't good enough to play in the top 4 and we don't need a bottom pairing guy (with Broberg coming up)

Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 12:35 a.m.

Thread: Reclamation Types

Holloway has dealt with a ton of unlucky injuries and has been so great for us in the playoffs so far, Broberg also has been doing great in the AHL. As stated by <a href="/users/Bluetomorrow83" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Bluetomorrow83</a> we are up against the cap pretty hard next year meaning we are going to be relying on Broberg and Holloway to fill key depth (or for Holloway potentially top 6 if he keeps this up) spots for cheap.

Only way I can see either being moved is in a larger package for TK or Sanheim which Philly won't want to do

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 2:18 a.m.

Thread: Modified Supporting Cast

Lmao Columbus isn't going to give up their 3.5 million dollar all-star captain for essentially Vancouver's trash. Like there's nothing of value for them in that package.

Overpay big time on the Toffoli and Zadorov contracts in my mind, could lower both by around 1-1.5 million.

Interesting Hronek concept, he's going to want 7.5-8 million long term but he may take a cheaper one year deal to hit the UFA market to score big money

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 12:53 a.m.

Thread: Unrealistic

All teams reject but Ottawa in particular has a good laugh

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 12:42 a.m.

Thread: Chicago - 2024-25 - Off Season

Edmonton accepts, would be a great fit to our middle 6 for only 1 million a n d we dump the Campbell contract?

Deal every day of the week.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 4:52 a.m.

Thread: Huge trade

I don't think it makes sense for either side personally,

Bouchard is a better fit for Edmonton (Offensively based) + a better player right now (Which fits Edmonton's win- now situation)

Seider is a better fit for Detroit (Two-way based) + going to be better in the long-term (Which fits Detroits youth movement)

Overall the trade isn't bad value wise but both teams are better off with their own guys

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 9:47 p.m.

Thread: Another Marner Deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>Even if Marner made sense for NSH, that's a grotesque overpay.</div></div>

Is it? Saros is most likely gone in free agency next year anyways unless the Preds want to pay him 7-8 million long-term to play with Askarov, as I've discussed with other Pred fans recently Tomasino is the odd man out in their future top 6, Carrier is hitting free agency anyways. The 1st and 2nd obviously hurt to lose for a young team but what are the odds either of those players become as good as Marner

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 9:42 p.m.

Thread: Draisaitl

Though I'm sure the Habs can make room by dumping Gallagher, it's going to cost $14 million to sign Drai long-term wherever he goes

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:38 p.m.

Thread: trading for marner

Ryan Leonard at a minimum.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGApr. 30 at 5:49 p.m.

Thread: Bye Linus Welcome

Lmao absolutely not, whether Drai is a rental or not isn't Edmontons problem.

Price starts at Swayman (not Ullmark but Swayman, he's younger, better and would actually come to Edmonton), Carlo, Poitras and whatever other capital you got to fill the rest.

This package wouldn't even grab Bouchard in all honesty

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:25 p.m.

Thread: Moving up to 7

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dmascaro069</b></div><div>Atkinson and Johansen are both 100% not in Philly next year.</div></div>

I see them getting moved at the TDL at half retained each for mid-round picks

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:24 p.m.

Thread: Moving up to 7

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Sens shouldn’t do this. They need a Dman on an ELC at 7

At worse they take Iginla</div></div>

Don't they have

Sanderson - Zub
Chabot - Chychrun?? Their top 6 is also littered with young talent at the moment, I don't see how either prospect develops

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:23 p.m.

Thread: Moving up to 7

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chapee44</b></div><div>That's a massive overpay for Laughton. Sabres should say absolutely not.</div></div>

I looked at it less from a value perspective and more so team-fit perspective. Around the league Laughton was being offered for a 1st which is far too high and was before his abysmal season but still was being offered that. Philly would probably half to retain 50% but he fits into Buffalo's middle 6 and fits their vision of making the playoffs by promoting a more defensive minded bottom 6

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:22 p.m.

Thread: Moving up to 7

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>TK should get that return with even including our 1st. ADB got more than that and he’s not even as good as TK so there’s no need to include the FLA 1st</div></div>

ADB was younger, going to be an RFA, had higher goal scoring potential and had a year still on his deal. Due to that he was able to grab the 7th, TK holds less value meaning they're going to need the FLA 1st to move up to #7

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:08 p.m.

Thread: Bye Demko Hello Silovs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>Give it a year or so, the Demko/Markstrom conversation will be back as Silovs/Demko.</div></div>

Uh I mean that's a pretty optimistic approach to things, Silovs has never broken the .910 SV% in North American play while Demko had done it 3 times when he was the age Silovs is right now. Demko was also an early 2nd round pick in the most stacked draft in NHL history while Silovs was a 6th (I get that draft position doesn't mean much especially with goalies but it does entail certain physical advantages). For this to be a good move Silovs would have to take a massive jump in consistent play down in Abbotsford next year and Demko would have to continue his injury plagued struggles, Silovs is not ready to be an NHL starter on any team and to move on from Demko before his contract is up when he's only signed to 5 million is just a great way to ruin this teams momentum

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 3:57 p.m.

Thread: Bye Demko Hello Silovs

I can't tell if this is supposed to be satire but moving on from your vezina nominee goaltender who is signed to 5 million a year just because a 23rd year old 6th round pick had an ok game might be the worst idea in Canucks history with all due respect. This move would take the Canucks tandem from being top 3 to bottom 5

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 1:27 p.m.

Thread: Improvements Under the Cap

I haven't watched much of Risto as of recently (past 1-2 years) has he cleaned up his defensive game to a point where he's far better than Ceci and Kulak?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 1:35 a.m.

Thread: Blackhawks post Bedard

I love how Edmonton's 1st just happens to be #10 for whatever reason lmao

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 12:20 a.m.

Thread: Gent

Ducks reject, they don't want to get involved in that mess

Buying out Nurse is a terrible idea, he's been pretty great these playoffs and is a top-pairing guy around 50% of the time. No reason to make the d-core far worse with the Savard and Zadorov replacements.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 5:52 p.m.

Thread: Habs

Ehhh I mean value wise it's somewhat worth it but Edmonton doesn't wanna deal with Anderson even at 2.5

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 5:51 p.m.

Thread: Necas trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MrAicrow2009</b></div><div>Zadorov is a good example of a defensemen who deserves more than Samuelsson, Zadorov is still a top defensemen who is worth the amount of Money samuelsson is making rn</div></div>

But Zadorov is only on pace for 21 points?? How does this fit your argument of points being important for d-men who are defensive minded. By your logic Zadorov isn't worth that money either

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 5:22 p.m.

Thread: Necas trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MrAicrow2009</b></div><div>Ghost is worth 4-6 Million, DeAngelo is just under 3 Million, And Klingberg is not doing good</div></div>

Signing a 31 year old, bad defensively Shayne Ghostisbehere to 5-6 million long-term is just a recipe for disaster, I can get around 4-4.5 million but anything higher makes no sense. DeAngelo doesn't even play most of the time anymore and Klingberg was rough even before this year. He was never worth anything more than 5 million and the Stars dodged a bullet by not signing him long-term at his peak

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

NucksnOilers

Save Mcdavid

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day